View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:Stroke recurrence largely depends on the detection of the cause and the control of vascular risk factors, with occult atrial fibrillation (AF) being one of the most important. Prolonged ambulatory cardiac monitoring is recommended for detecting occult AF. Currently, there are non-invasive monitoring devices such as the textile Holter that have proven to be useful for monitoring for up to 30 days but not longer. Another alternative is smartwatches, although they must be validated for use in the elderly population who have had a stroke.
Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center study to compare the safety and efficacy of the Perclose ProStyle suture-mediated closure device (PPS) as to manual compression (MC) for venous hemostasis following single shot device (SSD) based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
This primary care study aims to compare the "time in therapeutic range" (TTR) of two strategies for monitoring the international normalized ratio (INR) over 6 months in nursing homes. The population consists of frail elderly patients for whom Anti-Vitamin K treatments are frequent, and who are consequently more prone to embolic and hemorrhagic complications.
International medical centre Medicor from Slovenia has reported 306 successful percutaneous closures of patent foramen ovale (PFO) from October 2006 till June 2022. The investigators are going to follow-up the participants clinically and with contrast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to define the percentage of functional percutaneous closure. The latter is defined with the number (ten or less) of contrast-bubbles in the left atrium during Valsalva maneuver and contrast (agitated saline) application. The clinical follow-up will show the recurrence of embolic events (cerebrovascular insults, transient ischemic attacks) after percutaneous closure. In addition all of the participants are going to be screened for atrial fibrillation. The patients with moderate residual shunts (more than ten bubbles in the left atrium) will then according to the protocol have a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) to show the eventual mechanism of the shunt. If the TEE will not show any signs of a residual shunt, the patients will undergo a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) of the pulmonary circulation to exclude arterio-venous fistulas as a cause of the shunt seen on TTE. The investigators will also show the comparison in functional closure between classic and alternative device occluders.
The aim is to investigate whether optimizing patients' expectations towards the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation (catheter ablation) leads to a lower disease-related impairment of the patients compared to the control group in the first three months after ablation (the so-called blanking period).
RIVOX-AF study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study in which patients with AF are allocated to medication-app group or conventional treatment group. The App based feed-back algorithm will provide the patients with check taking drug or reminding of taking drug.
Current guidelines for the cardioversion of paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation at the Emergency Department do not prioritize between antiarrhythmic agents and do not consider the time taken for successful cardioversion. Furthermore, the use of flecainide -a class 1C antiarrhythmic agent- is contraindicated for the cardioversion of patients with revascularized coronary artery disease, as well as patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and preserved ejection fraction. These recommendations stem from insufficient data, mainly from the CAST study. The present study is a prospective, multicentre, randomized clinical trial. The primary goals of this clinical trial are to prove the superiority of flecainide over amiodarone in the successful cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation at the Emergency Department, and to prove that the safety of flecainide is non-inferior to amiodarone, in patients with coronary artery disease without residual ischemia and ejection fraction over 35%. The secondary goals of the study are to prove the superiority of flecainide over amiodarone in the reduction of hospitalizations from the Emergency Department due to atrial fibrillation, in the time taken to achieve cardioversion, and to the reduction of the need to conduct electrical cardioversion. The study population will be all consecutive new-comers to the Emergency Department with primary diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and history of coronary artery disease without angina, without residual ischemia and with ejection fraction > 35%. The sample size will be 200 patients, who will be monitored for 30 days. At the Emergency Department, all patients will be under continuous ECG monitoring, and a 24-hour ECG device will also be placed (Holter). The patients will be randomized to the treatment group (flecainide) and the control group (amiodarone). Patients in both arms will stay at the ED for a total of 6 hours after therapy initiation. If no adverse events occur in this time, the patient will be discharged from the ED. Otherwise, the patient will be admitted to the hospital. At 24 hours, the patients will visit the study centre for physical examination, ECG, cardiac ultrasound, 24-hour ECG removal and adverse events evaluation. At 30 days, follow-up via phone calls will be conducted for the evaluation of the study outcomes and adverse events.
This is a multicenter, randomized controlled study. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of LBBAP with traditional biventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and heart Failure
ß blocker and digoxin effect on left atrium reservoir function are unknown. This is a randomized open label study to compare the effect of theses two molecules on left atrium function
This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the edoxaban and the warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with mitral stenosis. The study design is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, investigator initiated phase 2 trial. The patients were randomly assigned to Edoxaban or Warfarin groups. Primary outcome was a composite of stroke and systemic arterial thromboembolism. The safety outcome was major bleeding.