Clinical Trials Logo

Atrial Fibrillation clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01925755 Completed - Stroke Clinical Trials

Non-interventional Local Study on Prescription Behavior of Anticoagulation Therapy in Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

NEURO-XAR
Start date: July 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This is local prospective multicenter observational non-interventional local study. Primary study objective is investigate and describe prescription pattern of neurologists in secondary stroke or non-CNS (non-Central Nervous System) systemic embolism prevention in patients with AF (Atrial fibrillation) and prior stroke or TIA (Transient Ischemic attack) who treat with rivaroxaban at an initial visit and three follow-up visits.

NCT ID: NCT01922726 Completed - Bradycardia Clinical Trials

Registry of Sleep Apnea Monitoring and Atrial Fibrillation in Pacemaker Patients (RESPIRE)

Start date: July 2013
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The purpose of the study is to evaluate at 12 Months follow-up the association between Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Sleep Apnea (SA) severity based on data measured and stored in REPLY 200 DR pacemaker.

NCT ID: NCT01920412 Completed - Stroke Clinical Trials

Feasibility and Safety Study of LAmbre Left Atrial Appendage Occluder

Start date: October 2012
Phase: Early Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This study mainly evaluated the feasibility and safety of LAmbre Left Atrial Appendage Occluder which is to prevent ischemic stroke caused by atrial fibrillation(AF).

NCT ID: NCT01920295 Completed - Clinical trials for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Safety and Efficacy of Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation as First-line Therapy

C-frost
Start date: January 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation can be used as first-line therapy compared to second choice after failed medical therapy

NCT ID: NCT01914926 Completed - Clinical trials for Heart Rate and Rhythm Disorders

Comparison of Diltiazem and Metoprolol in the Management of Acute Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter

DiME
Start date: June 2009
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Acute atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained, clinically significant dysrhythmia encountered in the emergency department (ED) and the most common dysrhythmia treated by emergency physicians. Atrial flutter is less common than atrial fibrillation but its management in the ED is very similar, and the majority of patients with atrial flutter also have atrial fibrillation. Symptomatic relief and ventricular rate control are generally the primary therapeutic objectives in the ED management of acute atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFF). The need for swift, appropriate action by the emergency physician is highlighted by the fact that up to 18% of patients with AFF develop potentially life-threatening complications such as congestive heart failure, hypotension, ventricular ectopy, respiratory failure, angina and myocardial infarction. Both beta-blocking agents and calcium channel blockers are commonly used to treat AFF in the ED. Metoprolol is the most commonly used beta-blocker; and diltiazem is the most frequently used calcium channel antagonist.[8] Diltiazem was released by the FDA for treatment of AFF in 1992. Shreck et al. were the first to demonstrate both the efficacy of diltiazem in the ED management of AFF with rapid rate and its clear superiority over the previously most commonly used pharmacologic agent, digoxin. To date, only one prospective, randomized trial has compared the effectiveness of a calcium channel blocker (diltiazem) with a beta-blocker (metoprolol) for rate control of AFF in the ED. Despite the relatively small sample size (n=20 in each group) the authors concluded that both pharmacologic agents were similarly effective. In order to test this finding, the investigators conducted a prospective comparison of metoprolol and diltiazem for the management of patients presenting to the ED with AFF with rapid ventricular rate.

NCT ID: NCT01913522 Completed - Clinical trials for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Cryoballoon vs. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs. Standard Exposure Duration

CIRCA-DOSE
Start date: September 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with reductions in quality of life, functional status, cardiac performance, and overall survival.1 Catheter ablation, which is centered on electrical isolation of triggering foci within the pulmonary veins (PVI) through circumferential lesions around PV ostia, has been shown to result in sustained improvements in quality of life, decreased hospitalizations and, potentially, improved survival.2-4 PVI can be accomplished by percutaneous catheter-based thermo-coagulation (burning) with radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery or alternatively by thermo-cooling (freezing) with a cryoballoon catheter.5 Cryothermal ablation with a cryoballoon catheter offers an efficacious means to achieve PVI that is safer than the established technique. Although cryoballoon ablation has been used in clinical practice for sometime, the optimal duration of cryoballoon ablation has not been determined. Moreover, the biophysics of cryo-lesion formation suggests that repeated short freezes ("freeze-thaw-freeze" cycles) may be more efficacious in achieving deep homogenous lesion when compared to prolonged freezing durations. This grant proposal is to verify if repeated short freezing cycles are more efficacious (i.e., fewer recurrence of AF), and safer, than the established standard of long, single freeze cycles.

NCT ID: NCT01912911 Completed - Clinical trials for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Evaluating the Efficacy and Feasibility of a Novel Wireless ECG Recording System in Monitoring Patients After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedure

iTransmit
Start date: June 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The investigators goal in this study is to examine the feasibility and efficacy of AliveCor iphone case monitoring device in monitoring patients after AF ablation by comparing transmissions using Alive Cor with transmissions from a traditional transtelephonic monitor (TTM). A secondary goal is to assess the ease of use of AliveCor device compared to traditional TTM system from the patient's perspective

NCT ID: NCT01912326 Completed - Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Trials

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation by Optimized Overdrive Stimulation

PAFOS
Start date: July 2002
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Evaluation of dynamic Atrial Overdrive Stimulation using the AF Suppression Algorithm to prevent atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with more than 2% Auto Mode Switch Episodes with optimized pacemaker programming. Hypothesis: Dynamic atrial Overdrive (AF Suppression) reduces AT/AF Burden by 30% as compared to programming DDDR-(60) without AF Suppression when all other parameters are optimized.

NCT ID: NCT01907828 Completed - Hypertension Clinical Trials

A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Effect of Concomitant Renal Denervation and Cardiac Ablation on AF Recurrence

RDN+AF
Start date: April 15, 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this post market clinical investigation is to complete preliminary evaluation on whether or not concomitant renal denervation with the EnligHTN™ Renal Denervation System and cardiac ablation will result in improved outcomes as compared to ablation alone in patients with uncontrolled hypertension being treated for Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT01900678 Completed - Clinical trials for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the VytronUS Low-Intensity Collimated Ultrasound Ablation System

Start date: June 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The objective of this investigation is to evaluate whether pulmonary vein isolation using the VytronUS ablation system is safe and effective acutely and at 3 months.