View clinical trials related to Asthma.
Filter by:This is a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multiple-dose study designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneously administered HAE1 in subjects 12-75 years old with moderate to severe asthma whose symptoms are inadequately controlled with moderate to high-dose ICS and LABA.
Background: Exhaled nitric oxide and inflammatory biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate may be useful to diagnose and monitor childhood asthma. Their ability to indicate an asthma diagnosis, and to assess asthma severity and control, is largely unknown. Objective: To study 1) the ability of exhaled nitric oxide and inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (nitrite, nitrate, hydrogen peroxide, 8-isoprostane, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-2,-4,-5,-10, acidity) to discriminate between childhood asthma and controls. 2) the ability of these biomarkers to indicate asthma severity and control. Methods: 114 Children were included: 64 asthmatics (10.7±3.0 years, 67.2% atopic) and 50 controls (10.0±0.4 years). Condensate was collected using a glass condenser
Background By means of measurements of series of non-invasive inflammatory markers in exhaled breath (condensate), a reflection of inflammatory processes and oxidative stress, can be obtained. Thereby, these techniques could be important in monitoring asthma and CF lung disease in children. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) reflect ongoing inflammation and oxidative stress in the airways. These markers have a promising capacity for monitoring diagnoses of CF and asthma lung disease. Aim To study the course of inflammatory markers in time in children with asthma and CF, in stable periods and during pulmonary exacerbations. In addition, we study the ability of inflammatory markers to predict safe tapering of medical treatment in both populations. 1. To study the course of inflammatory markers in EBC during an exacerbation. 2. To study which IM are already elevated before a clinical exacerbation is evident and can predict exacerbations in time. 3. To study which inflammatory markers can predict safe discontinuation of antibiotics in children with CF, or tapering of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma. 4. To study the relationship between inflammatory markers in EBC, the severity and control of CF and asthma, the symptoms and lung function within patients will be analysed. Methods Children with CF (n=30) and children with asthma (n=40) were recruited included from our outpatient clinic. During this longitudinal study patients visit the outpatient clinic were followed–up for 12 months; every two months during one year. patients visited our outpatient clinic. In addition to these standard visits, During exacerbations patients four extra visits were planned during an exacerbation. were asked to visit the University Hospital Maastricht four times. These additional visits were planned with a maximum of two times during the study. By means of a home monitor, children were asked to assess measurements of Besides measurements in the University Hospital, children measured forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at home using a home monitor, to record medication use, and, to record presence and severity of pulmonary symptoms. Outcome parameters were: 1) FeNO assessment in exhaled air, 2) inflammatory markers in EBC, 3) lung function parameters, 4) specific questionnaires to assess asthma and CF control and severity, 5) data originating from the home monitor.
The loss of deep inhalation bronchoprotection in asthmatic individuals has been shown to be related to the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness, a hallmark of asthma. In several studies, asthmatic individuals with mild airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) (methacholine PC20 > 2 mg/mL) had a difference in methacholine PC20 with and without deep inhalations that averaged 1.8 doubling methacholine concentrations (p=0.0003). Conversely, asthmatic individuals with moderate to severe AHR (methacholine PC20 ≤ 2 mg/mL) had a non-significant difference in methacholine PC20 with and without deep inhalations (p=0.09). This loss of deep inhalation bronchoprotection is also now believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. Airway inflammation is another of the key features of asthma and information on airway inflammation is increasingly being used in the diagnosis and treatment of asthma. The level of airway inflammation (as measured by fraction of exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophilia) has also been shown to be correlated to the level of airway hyperresponsiveness (as measured by methacholine PC20). In addition, glucocorticoids have been shown to decrease airway hyperresponsiveness, further suggesting that these two phenomena, airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness, are related. We therefore suggest that the degree of airway inflammation is related to the loss of deep inhalation bronchoprotection and expect there to be a negative correlation between the degree of deep inhalation bronchoprotection and airway inflammation.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of Alvesco® (Ciclesonide) compared with usual asthma care in the primary care setting. Patients with a history of asthma for at least 6 months and who, in the opinion of the physician, meet the clinical requirements for treatment with inhaled steroids (ICS) will be enrolled. They will either receive Alvesco® or usual care.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the level of satisfaction experienced by asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients when using the Fluticasone/Salmeterol HFA Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) with counter, as compared to using Fluticasone/Salmeterol HFA MDI without counter.
This study was designed to provide data about the safety and efficacy of 3 doses of indacaterol (150, 300, and 600 µg) in Japanese asthma patients so that an optimal dose, or doses, could be chosen for testing in later studies.
The study is designed to obtain safety and efficacy data on three dose levels of indacaterol when delivered via an SDDPI in patients with persistent asthma. All patients will receive 1 day of treatment with each of the following: indacaterol 150 µg, indacaterol 300 µg, indacaterol 600 µg, placebo, and formoterol. Each treatment day will be followed by a washout-period of 1 week
Background Chronic inflammation in peripheral airways plays an important role in the pathophysiology of asthma. Extrafine hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) beclometasone is distinguished from other ICS because of its fine aerosol characteristics. As a result, there is a greater extent of deposition of extrafine HFA-beclometasone in the peripheral airways. Therefore, extrafine HFA-beclometasone may have an extra anti-inflammatory effect in children with asthma. Aim To analyse the potential extra anti-inflammatory effect of extrafine HFA-beclometasone compared to HFA-flucticasone in children with asthma by means of alveolar nitric oxide (NO) concentration and bronchial NO flux, inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC), and conventional parameters. Method In a cross-over study design of 6 months, 33 children, aged 6-12 years, with doctor diagnosed mild persistent asthma, were treated with extrafine HFA-beclometasone inhaled from an autohaler and HFA-flucticasone inhaled from a discus. Primary outcome parameters of this study were; alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux. Secondary outcome parameters were inflammatory markers in EBC, lung function parameters, symptoms, presence and duration of exacerbations and adverse effects. All parameters were recorded at baseline and after each treatment period.
The primary purpose of this study is to gather additional safety data for the subjects treated with the Alair System (hereinafter, "Alair-Treated Subjects") who previously completed the one-year study entitled: "Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Bronchial Thermoplasty with the Alair System for the Treatment of Severe Asthma" (Protocol #0903-27) sponsored by Asthmatx, Inc. Subjects who elect to participate in this safety study will be followed for an additional four (4) year period beyond the PREDECESSOR STUDY'S one-year endpoint (clinicaltrials.gov number NCT00214539).