View clinical trials related to Asthma.
Filter by:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the education program (HPPCA - Health Promotion Program for Children with Asthma), which was developed by using cartoons and comic based on the health promotion model of Nola J Pender and brain-based learning theories, on disease control and life quality in children aged between 7 and 11, and diagnosed with asthma. Materials and Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 74 children between the ages of 7 and 11, who presented to a respiratory disease unit of a university hospital in Istanbul. Children were randomly assigned to the experimental (38 children) and control (36 children) groups using the Urn method. It was administered to both groups prior to the intervention. After the HPPCA education administered only to the experimental group, both groups were administered two post-tests as a follow-up in the 1st and 3rd months. Standardized sociodemographic question form, Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) were used for the follow-up. The data were evaluated using statistical parametric tests.
This study is a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. It plan to investigate the predictors for asthma exacerbation in long term follow up real world management with analyzing big data of electronic medical records (EMR).
Bronchial remodeling is an abnormal tissue repair process of the bronchial wall components that characterizes severe asthma which can include epithelial abrasion, thickening of the reticular basement membrane (RBM), an increase in bronchial fibrosis, blood vessel count, mucosal gland mass and/or bronchial smooth muscle (BSM) mass. We identified using latent class analysis two classes of patients. Compared to the second class, the first class was characterized by an increase in RBM thickness, blood vessel count, BSM mass and a decrease in RBM-BSM distance, mucus gland mass and bronchial fibrosis. We then hypothesized that this first latent class identified children at risk of asthma exacerbations.
This study is a randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical study which conducted over six months (May to October 2016) in different Jordanian cities, where most of Syrian refugees reside. The primary aim of this study was to assess refugees' adherence and knowledge of their chronic medications, and impact of the medication management review (MMR) service delivered by a clinical pharmacist on their adherence and knowledge of their chronic medications three months following delivering the service. An informed consent form was signed by all participants who accepted to participate (n=106). Participants were then randomized into intervention and control groups. The first group would have received the medication management review service during the study period, while the to the other group directly after the study was completed (after three months' time). Two validated questionnaire were used in the study for assessment; adherence to medications questionnaire and Knowledge about chronic medications questionnaire. These questionnaire were filled by tha patients at baseline and follow up home visits.
Asthma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are the most common conditions in World Trade Center (WTC) rescue and recovery workers. In this study, the study team will evaluate the interplay of biological and behavioral mechanisms explaining the relationship of PTSD with increase asthma morbidity and adapt and pilot test a novel intervention to improve outcomes of WTC workers.
Currently, no study has addressed real-life data describing changes in health resource consumption and related costs attributable to mepolizumab treatment. The aim of the current study is to fill this knowledge gap by performing an exhaustive extraction of data for patients receiving mepolizumab in the French single-payer health care system. The change in real-life health-resource usage and costs observed for these patients would provide the first evidence that mepolizumab is changing the care landscape for eligible severe asthma patients. The overall objectives of this study are: (i) using the SNDS French national database, to identify a representative, nation-wide population of patients treated with mepolizumab with a follow-up period of at least 12 months, (ii) to describe the initial one-year changes in health resource use before and after the initiation of mepolizumab treatment and (iii) to estimate the change in associated costs for the first year of treatment. These initial data will additionally serve as a basis for the design of longer-term studies. Primary objective: To estimate the change in associated costs for the first year of treatment
This study has two parts. The main purpose of Part 1 of this study will be to examine how safe and effective two doses of SelK2 is on participants with mild asthma. Lung function and inflammatory cell numbers will be measured in response to the administration of an allergen (a compound to which the participant is allergic) into the lungs in the presence or absence of SelK2. Part 2 of this study will examine how safe and effective one dose of SelK2 is on participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Lung function and inflammatory cell numbers will be measured in COPD patients in the presence or absence of SelK2. SelK2 may block the movement of key inflammatory cells into the lungs and consequently improve lung function in these two patient populations.
This study examines the implications of providing hospital-level care in rural homes.
"Severe asthma affects only 5% of asthmatics, but has a considerable impact on patients owing to the respiratory disability linked to asthma but also complications from oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy. Biologics have recently been made available, and improve quality of life (QoL)severe asthma patients. Having a reproducible and reliable measuring tool of QoL for severe asthmatics would be useful for assessing the impact of the various interventions proposed. QoL questionnaires currently used in respiratory diseases are not specific to severe asthma. They are very focused on respiratory disability, but for example do not take into account the impact of treatments, especially oral steroids. The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) is the very first tool specifically designed to assess the health related quality of life of severe asthma population. The development of its use goes through the validation of this questionnaire in its French translation available since September 2019. "
The aim of the study is to assess the usefulness of the indirect bronchial hyperresponsiveness test (with hypertonic NaCl) in determining the optimal dose of inhaled steroids to maintain asthma control. The study was designed as a prospective, real-life, randomized, interventional study. This single-site study is performed at the Allergology Clinic in Lesko. The study included participants aged 7-15 years who met the eligibility criteria. Eligible participants were selected from a pool of 231 patients with mild asthma, under the care of the Allergology Clinic of the Regional Public Hospital in Lesko (Poland). All participants were diagnosed with chronic mild asthma for at least two years. Subjects initially enrolled in the study had good asthma control maintained for at least 3 months on low / medium-dose ICS monotherapy, with no exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids in the previous 3 months, no respiratory tract infection in last month, and an FEV1 above 80% expected. Finally, 108 children were enrolled in the study. They were aged 7-15 years, with active mild asthma, confirmed by the presence of bronchial hyperreactivity and symptoms of asthma, emerging after discontinuation of anti-inflammatory treatment. Participation in the study lasted one year. The study includes: 4-week run-in period (withdrawal phase) after discontinuation of anti-inflammatory treatment (ICS) with clinical symptoms and medication use recording, completed by the patient and parents. At the end of this period, spirometry was performed, bronchial hyperreactivity was assessed with the hyperosmolar salt provocation, and the parameters of inflammation were measured: orally exhaled nitric oxide concentration (NO) and peripheral blood eosinophilia. The anti-inflammatory treatment was then resumed (with ICS in the previous doses). Only patients with active asthma and increased bronchial responsiveness (DRS>0.55) were qualified for the main study. Stratified randomization was performed for age, clinical symptoms, and the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness. On this basis, the division into 2 research groups was made: - a symptom-only monitored treatment group - a group in which therapy changes were based on the symptoms and degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR group). Patients/parents were provided by an established algorithm for managing asthma symptoms/exacerbations. In the case of loss of asthma control, a beta-agonist was administered (temporarily) and the dose of ICS quadrupled. Patients had the possibility of additional visits - if necessary. Especially, severe exacerbations were verified by the attending physician, and on this basis, oral steroids would be considered. Throughout the study, the participants kept daily observation charts (clinical symptoms and drug use) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measurements. The telephone report was made monthly with the number of days with asthma symptoms and medications used, and this was recorded in the documentation of the study. The clinical evaluation was performed every 3 months with symptom evaluation, spirometry, exhaled NO, peripheral blood eosinophilia, and BHR measurements (half of the patients). The treatment adjustments were guided by the patient's and parent's reporting of symptoms, and additionally by the results of periodic clinical assessment (including the assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the BHR group). This means that the level of treatment intensity (ICS dose) was based on symptom monitoring only in the observation group, and additionally took into account the level of bronchial responsiveness in the BHR monitoring group. The study was completed after one year of follow-up (4 visits every 3 months). The primary endpoint of the study: the number of asthma exacerbations in both study arms. Secondary endpoints: - days with symptoms - asthma medication days - final dose of ICS - spirometry (FEV1, MMEF) - bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR group only) - nitric oxide in the exhaled air - peripheral blood eosinophilia.