View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:Femoral artery approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an ideal approach site. However the closure for femoral artery after transfemoral TAVI is challenging. We aimed to compared the efficacy and safety of Angio-Seal + Proglide vs. Dual Proglide for femoral arteriotomy closure following TAVI
MiECS is one of the largest multicentre randomised controlled trials on extracorporeal circulation conducted under the auspices of Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society (MiECTiS). It is designed to ultimately address the emerging effectiveness of MiECC systems in the light of modern perfusion practice worldwide. The primary hypothesis is that MiECC, as compared to conventional CPB (cCPB), reduces the proportion of patients experiencing serious perfusion-related postoperative morbidity after cardiac surgery. The study will be led by the Clinical Research Unit of the Special Unit for Biomedical Research and Education (SUBRE), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine in Greece (AUSoM) with Chief Investigator Professor Kyriakos Anastasiadis, who is a key-opinion-leader in the field of MiECC, founder and Executive Board of MiECTiS.
• The aim of 3DP-FAST study is to analyze the accuracy of replicating cardiovascular anatomical structures using different techniques and to evaluate the feasibility of 3D printed models of aortic stenosis in guiding TAVI procedure. By conducting a comparative analysis of measurements achieved on CCTA images versus measurements obtained with a specialized projection platform by photogrammetry vs 3D printed models of various aortic valvular and perivalvular structures will be evaluated the accuracy of each step of image dataset processing. Furthermore, the study will evaluate the rate of valvular leak or peri-procedural complications such as embolic events or atrio-ventricular conduction block based on coronary computed tomography angiographic and ECG assessment at 1 year after enrollment.
Rationale: Cardiovascular disease and cognitive diseases are closely related. Cognitive impairment is common (21-39%) among patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. The proof-of-concept CP-TAVI study showed that increased cardiac output following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was associated with increased cerebral blood flow. It is hypothesized that increased cerebral blood flow (CBF) subsequently leads to improved cognitive functioning. Additionally, silent micro emboli caused by crushing of the calcified native valve during TAVI may cause cognitive deterioration. If it could be predicted which patients are at risk for TAVI induced cerebral micro emboli, these patients could benefit from cerebral protection devices, preventing cognitive decline. Objective: The objectives of the CAPITA study are 1A) to identify whether an increase in cardiac output after TAVI is associated with an increase of global CBF; 1B) explore regional differences in CBF after TAVI; 1C) determine whether (global or regional) increased CBF is associated with improved cognitive functioning; 1D) identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with increased cardiac output, CBF and cognitive functioning; 2A) identify the incidence and volume of new white matter hyperintensities after TAVI; 2B) evaluate patient and procedural predictors for the increase in white matter hyperintensities volume, including baseline aortic valve calcification volume, measured with computed tomography; 2C) if aortic valve calcification volume predicts new white matter hyperintensities, define a cut-off value for high-risk patients; 2D) assess whether the increase in white matter hyperintensity volume is associated with deterioration of cognitive scores. Study design: Prospective observational study, measuring cardiac output (echocardiography), cerebral blood flow (arterial spin labelling magnetic resonance imaging) and cognitive functioning (neuropsychological test battery) prior to TAVI (<24 hours to <one week) and at 3 months follow-up. At one year follow-up, cardiac output and cognitive function will be assessed. Study population: Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis eligible for transfemoral TAVI (n=142). Main study parameters/endpoints: Cardiac output (L/min), cerebral blood flow (mL/100g/min, change in %, relative to baseline) and cognitive functioning (extensive neuropsychological testing 60-90 minutes).
The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate microcirculatory alterations in patients undergoing open heart surgery with minimal invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation. Positive clinical results evidenced with goal-directed perfusion and cerebral oximetry monitoring could be attributed to preserved microcirculation at tissue level.
Data on valve performance following ViV-TAVR has usually been obtained with the use of Doppler-echocardiography. However, some reports have shown significant discordances in the evaluation of mean transvalvular gradient between echocardiography and catheterization, with an overestimation of the real gradient with echo (vs. cath) in most cases. Thus, the incidence of procedural-device failure may be lower than that reported in the ViV-TAVR literature,
Over the last years, several randomized studies comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have established TAVI as a treatment option in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS) (1,2,3). Most transcatheter heart valves (THV) available are designed on either a balloon-expandable (BE) or a self-expanding (SE) concept. Despite major differences, both designs are recommended to be used indifferently in most of the clinical situations and a significant number of centers only implant one of this two THV design. It remains unclear however, whether these 2 very different THV concepts are achieving similar or different clinical outcomes and could be considered a single "Class" of device. While there is an urgent clinical need to clarify this issue in an exponentially growing therapeutic field, to date no large randomized study powered to compare the 2 THV designs on individual endpoints has been conducted or initiated. Recently, two large-scale French registry-based propensity matched analyses, including more than 30,000 patients, have reported a higher 90 days and 1-year mortality with the use of SE as compared to BE-valve (4,5). However, as the propensity-score matching-approach cannot rule out residual confounders, and as some of the most recent THV iterations were not part of the investigation, there is an urgent need to conduct a randomized trial sufficiently powered to compare head-to-head the latest generation of SE and BE-valve on all-cause mortality. In addition, two small randomized studies have recently showed the inferiority of a new SE-valve compared to BE-valve and SE-THV (SCOPE1 trial, J Lanz. Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1619-1628. and SCOPE 2 trial, Circulation in press), thus further questioning wether THV should be considered as a single "Class" regardless the THV design. The objective of the present randomized clinical investigation will be to evaluate the impact of THV design (SE vs BE) on the risk of all-cause mortality at 90 days and 1 year. The present clinical investigation will the first randomized clinical investigation to compare head to head the benefit of BE-valve over SE-valve on total mortality at 90 days and 1-year using a superiority design. Previous head-to-head studies included only a small number of patients, non-inferiority designs and combined endpoints. This clinical investigation will be the first to generate sufficient evidences to change clinical practice and international guidelines to clarify whether one THV design is superior (or not) to the other one (BE vs SE-valve). The result of the clinical investigation is key for clinicians indicating the treatment and for the patients receiving the treatment
Background: Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the commonest valve disease. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is primarily indicated when symptoms occur and/or when there is a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction. However, irreversible myocardial damage, such as replacement fibrosis, leads to increased morbidity and mortality despite treatment. Improved patient selection and timely treatment is thus warranted. T1 mapping, a non-invasive method to quantify myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), could be a marker to guide treatment. Aims: To investigate the change of myocardial fibrosis* in AS patients following AVR and if these changes are associated with disease and/or procedural characteristics. Methods: This is an observational clinical trial. Approximately 60 patients with severe AS planned to undergo AVR (either surgical or transcatheter) at Rigshospitalet, Denmark will be included. Participants will undergo CMR before surgery and at a 1-year follow-up. Other assessments include clinical evaluation and blood sampling. The primary end-point is change in T1 values after AVR. Hypotheses and perspectives: The investigators hypothesize that (1) myocardial fibrosis* will regress in patients undergoing AVR as a group, (2) the degree of myocardial fibrosis is positively correlated with the degree of symptoms, (3) the regression of myocardial fibrosis is greater in patients undergoing TAVR compared to SAVR, and (4) the regression of myocardial fibrosis is greater in patients with tricuspid aortic stenosis compared to bicuspid aortic stenosis. Ultimately, T1 mapping is a potential marker for improved patient selection for the timing of AVR. * Estimated by T1 mapping
In one of the most severe congenital heart defects, hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), the left ventricle is underdeveloped and the prognosis is worse than in most other heart defects. The underdevelopment can occur gradually during fetal growth caused by a narrowing of the aortic valve. At some international centers, such fetuses are treated with a balloon dilation of the narrowed valve, but there is no scientifically sound evidence that this treatment is effective. The aim of this study is: 1/ to evaluate whether balloon dilation during the fetal period of a narrowed aortic valve can reduce the risk of the left ventricle becoming underdeveloped and the baby being born with a so-called univentricular heart (HLHS); 2/ to investigate whether such treatment improves the prognosis for this group of children with a very complex and severe heart defect and 3/ to also describe side effects and risks in fetuses and mothers of the fetal procedure.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvulopathy in the general population in France and more generally in developed countries, due to populations aging. Its standard treatment is historically surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). In the 2000s, the management of this valvulopathy was revolutionized by the development of the technique of per-cutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVI). TAVI opens the possibility of curative treatment to patients at high operational risk not operable by conventional surgery, and for whom outcome was affected with high mortality under medical treatment alone. Amyloidosis, a pathology with multiple etiologies, is a rare condition and its cardiac form (AC) even more (8 to 17 / 100,000 people / year). However, its prevalence is increasing. Some autopsies series have found prevalence up to 50% of cardiac amyloidosis with transthyretin (AC-TTR) after 60 years. In addition, recent data suggested that AC-TTR prevalence is higher in the population of patients with heart disease: 13% in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and up to 16% in patients with AS. The outcome of patients with AC-TTR remains unknown after TAVI. Thus, the diagnosis of AC-TTR in patients undergoing TAVI represents an important issue. Indeed, a treatment stabilizing the process of accumulation of transthyretin deposits, effective on the survival of these patients, is now available. In addition, a non-invasive screening strategy for AC-TTR, alternative to biopsy, is now validated.