View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:To evaluate the safety and feasibility of DurAVR™ THV System in the treatment of subjects with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis regardless of surgical risk. While TAVR and SAVR share some of the benefits and risks, they importantly differ with regards to invasiveness, time to recovery, hemodynamics, as well as options for re-intervention and possibly valve durability. An early benefit of TAVR may be offset by late risks. Therefore, current guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommend an integration of patient values and preferences for the selection of the treatment modality. The objective of the TOGETHER trial is to investigate the efficacy of a structured shared decision making approach (SDM) to improve patient-centered outcomes for the choice between SAVR and TAVR. TOGETHER is an investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, single-center clinical trial. A total of 140 patients referred for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and deemed to undergo TAVR or SAVR according to heart team decision will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to structured SDM or usual care.
This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of a novel CT gantry supporting a .23 second rotation time and systematically compare it with 0.23 second rotation time, in patients with clinically indicated aortic CTA in the workup of aortic stenosis. Patients will be randomly assigned .23 or .28 sec rotation time CTA. Coronary artery interpretability rates will be determined in both groups.
The goal of this prospective, non-randomized, single-center, observational study is to assess whether there is a progressive dilation of ascending aorta after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients who underwent elective aortic valve replacement or TAVR for stenotic bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) at our institution from 2015 to June 2022. Participants will undergo both a CT and an echocardiographic assessment at least 90 days after surgery.
The goal of this study is to investigate the genetic and gender specific differences, in patients with low flow low gradient aortic stenosis and high flow high gradient aortic stenosis. Patients referred for surgical aorticvalve replacement will be offered to participarte in the study. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. Low-gradient aortic stenosis is associated with differences in valvular concentration of the genes that code for mast-cell chymase, Angiotensin-II, ACE, ACE2 and Angiotensin receptor 1 and 2. 2. Low-gradient aortic stenosis is associated with differences in the genetic code of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. 3. Gender differences in LV remodelling associates with different levels of sexual hormones. Patients participating in the study will be asked to undergo: - Cardiac ultrasound, MR- and CT-scan prior to surgery - Blooddraw prior to surgery. - Heartmuscle biopsy during surgery - Cardiac MR-scan 1 year after surgery.
A Clinical Trial of the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System with a Prospective, Multi-Center, One-Arm Approach to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis
The goal of this trial is to determine whether the use of a novel SGLT2 inhibitor(Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2), Enavogliflozin is safe and effective for the improvement of adverse clinical outcomes and the reversal of adverse cardiac remodelling among patients who had undergone TAVR as compared with the standard-of-care therapy.
The goal of this prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach versus the standard 'lower extremity' approach for accessory access sites in patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The main questions it aims to answer are whether a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach as compared with the standard 'lower extremity' approach: - Is associated with less clinically relevant access site-related bleeding complications. - Is associated with a shorter time to mobilization after TAVI. - Is associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization. - Has the same early safety outcomes at 30 days post-TAVI. Participants will be subject to the usual care surrounding a TAVI procedure but will also will be asked to fill out two questionnaires before and after TAVI: - Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH) - Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) Researchers will compare the minimally invasive, upper extremity group with the standard lower extremity to see if there are difference regarding the posed questions.
The goal of this observational study is to compare the overal survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) according to sarcopenia status evaluated from preprocedural CT scans. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is CT evaluated sarcopenia an independent predictor of overal survival after TAVI?
The goal of this study is to investigate whether patient-tailored follow-up for patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can prevent re-hospitalisation and improve quality of life compared with the standard follow-up program. The rationale of this study is the persistently high rate of re-hospitalisation after TAVI, which increases the risk of mortality and diminishes the patient-evaluated quality of life. Our hypothesis is that patient-tailored follow-up for patients treated with TAVI will reduce the rate of re-hospitalisation after the TAVI-procedure and improve quality of life. The primary endpoints are the rate of re-hospitalisation within 90 days of the procedure and quality of life adjusted life years at 90-day follow-up.