Clinical Trials Logo

Aortic Valve Insufficiency clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Insufficiency.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • Page 1 ·  Next »

NCT ID: NCT06192706 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Aortic Valve Stenosis

Clinical Investigation for the Foldax Tria Aortic Heart Valve- India

Start date: January 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to conduct a clinical investigation of the Foldax Tria Aortic Valve to collect evidence on the device's safety and performance.

NCT ID: NCT04415047 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Aortic Valve Disease

The JenaValve ALIGN-AR Pivotal Trial

ALIGN-AR
Start date: May 22, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To collect information about treatment for symptomatic severe Aortic Regurgitation (AR), which affects the aortic valve in the heart. Aortic regurgitation is a condition where aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly and allows some blood to leak back into the heart chamber. Symptoms of aortic regurgitation may include fatigue and shortness of breath. The preferred treatment for severe aortic regurgitation is aortic valve replacement surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04281771 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Aortic Valve Stenosis

Assessment of Paravalvular Leak After TAVI by Hemodynamic Measurements and Cardiac MRI

APPOSE
Start date: September 17, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rationale: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard therapy for elderly patients with high surgical risks. Paravalvular leakage after TAVI is relatively common and there is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of mild paravalvular leakage in self-expanding devices. Prospective data for self-expanding devices are required to compare the extent of paravalvular leakage as a result of device design. Grading paravalvular leakage after TAVI is difficult. Echocardiography and angiography systematically underestimate paravalvular leakage (PVL) as compared to cardiac MRI. Hemodynamic measurements are used to aid decision making directly after TAVI implantation. Prospective data comparing hemodynamic measurements with cardiac MRI are needed to design an optimal strategy to grade paravalvular leakage peri-operatively in order to optimize TAVI outcomes. The combination of aortic valve stenosis, angiodysplasia and von Willebrand Disease type 2A (vWD-2A) is known as Heyde syndrome. Previous studies have shown a decrease in angiodysplastic lesions after TAVI. However, since PVL after TAVI is relatively common, angiodysplastic lesions tend to reoccur. Prospective data comparing the severity of PVL to the severity of both vWD-2A and angiodysplasia are lacking. Objective: To assess procedural hemodynamic measurements in patients with paravalvular regurgitation quantified by means of cardiac MRI (CMR) and to analyse its association with impaired clinical outcome during 5-year follow-up. Secondary objectives are to assess whether the severity of vWD-2A correlates with the severity of PVL measured by cardiac MRI, and to prospectively assess the success percentage of TAVI in the treatment of angiodysplasia. Study design: This is a prospective, single-center clinical trial. Patients will receive a TAVI. After implantation different hemodynamic indices of PVL will be assessed. Within 4-8 weeks after TAVI a cardiac MRI will be performed to quantify the amount of PVL. Standardized clinical follow-up will take place at discharge, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. Telephone follow-up will take place at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after TAVI. In patients with known angiodysplasia or iron deficiency anemia e.c.i., a videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) will take place before TAVI and 6 months after TAVI. Of note, for the substudy on Heyde syndrome, patients with a different type of TAVI valve (i.e. no Abbott Portico valve) are also allowed to participate. Study population: Approximately 80 patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with an indication for TAVI will be included. At least 76 patients with a cardiac MRI that is of sufficient quality to quantify the amount of PVL will be included. Intervention: Patients will undergo cardiac MRI on top of standard clinical care within 4-8 weeks after TAVI. A subgroup of patients will also undergo a VCE. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is defined as PVL regurgitation fraction as measured by cardiac MRI. One secondary endpoint will comprise a composite of device success, early safety and clinical efficacy as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (1) and will comprise death, vascular complications, stroke/TIA, life-threatening bleeding requiring transfusion, and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. Another secondary endpoint will be the reduction of angiodysplastic lesions after TAVI as determined by VCE. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The hemodynamic indices can be assessed in a standard fashion using a fluid filled pigtail catheter that is placed in the left ventricle as part of the routine protocol. Following TAVI, enrolled patients will undergo cardiac MRI to assess PVL. The risk of cardiac MRI after TAVI implantation is negligible. Extra blood samples will be taken. After one year, patients will be followed by telephonic follow-up. Risk/benefit: the expected benefit is a structured clinical follow-up at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, at the cost of an extra visit to undergo cardiac MRI.

NCT ID: NCT03549091 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Aortic Regurgitation

Accuracy of Left Subclavian Regurgitation Evaluated by Ultrasound Doppler and 4D Flow MRI

SUBCLAR
Start date: May 4, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Aortic insufficiency (IA) is defined as an abnormal regurgitation of blood from the aorta to the left ventricle in diastole, due to a lack of tightness of the aortic valves. It represents about 10% of valvular pathologies but the annual mortality of nonoperated patients can be as high as 10% to 20%. The quantification of AI is therefore important as it can remain perfectly asymptomatic for a long time. Doppler echocardiography is currently the key examination to confirm the presence of valvulopathy, to allow positive diagnosis of valve leakage regardless of location, to specify the etiology and mechanism of regurgitation. The quantification of IA requires, in transthoracic ultrasound, to take into account many parameters that individually have all certain limitations. The recommendations are therefore to have an integrative approach considering a combination of different parameters and an overall interpretation. This makes it possible to evaluate with greater precision the importance of the leak. Thus, there is the difficulty of quantifying moderate and severe AI for lack of a truly unique criterion. One of the evaluation criteria commonly used in transthoracic ultrasound is diastolic regurgitation in the aortic arch but this assessment is sometimes difficult. The left subclavian artery (SCG) is more accessible than the aortic arch in terms of the ultrasound window. The measurements will be easier to record since the vessel is more superficial and there are fewer air interpositions than for the aortic arch. The quantification of the AI based on this new element will be compared to the other previously validated ultrasound criteria. The investigators will use this study to describe the feasibility of collecting coronary flow in the artery (IVA), and they will compare systolic velocity, diastolic rate / systolic rate ratio compared to a control group without severe aortic insufficiency (grades 2 and 3). The flows recorded in the IVA will be compared to the importance of the aortic leakage according to its different modes of quantification (ultrasound and MRI). The aim of the study will be to show that diastolic reflux in the left subclavian artery is a marker of severe AI (grades 2 and 3) by comparing this regurgitation with that measured at the level of the aortic arch and other validated ultrasound criteria and cardiac MRI.

NCT ID: NCT03520101 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Aortic Valve Stenosis

Comparison of the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Valve and Self-Expandable CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO System for the Treatment of Small, Severely Dysfunctional Surgical Aortic Bioprotheses. The 'LYTEN' Trial

Start date: May 10, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The treatment with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) of patients with small (≤23mm) surgical bioprostheses remains a challenge due to the increased transvalvular residual gradients and high rates of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) following the procedure.

NCT ID: NCT03466918 Active, not recruiting - Aortic Stenosis Clinical Trials

China S3: Safety and Effectiveness of Edwards Lifesciences SAPIEN 3 THV in the Chinese Population

Start date: May 23, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) transcatheter heart valve implantation (TAVI) in Chinese patients with symptomatic severe calcific aortic stenosis who are considered at high risk for surgical valve replacement.

NCT ID: NCT03383445 Active, not recruiting - Aortic Stenosis Clinical Trials

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versu Surgical Aortix Valve Replacement for Treating Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annuli: A Prospective Randomized Study The VIVA Trial

Start date: August 8, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To date, no formal, randomized, prospective, head-to-head comparisons of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been undertaken in the severe aortic stenosis (AS) population with small aortic annuli. Objectives of the present study are to compare the hemodynamic performance (incidence of severe PPM and ≥ moderate AR) and clinical outcomes (death, stroke, major or life threatening bleeding) between TAVR and SAVR in patients with severe AS and small aortic annuli.

NCT ID: NCT02732704 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Aortic Regurgitation

THE ALIGN-AR EFS TRIAL: JenaValve Pericardial TAVR Aortic Regurgitation Study

Start date: April 20, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To collect information about treatment for severe Aortic Regurgitation (AR), which affects the aortic valve in the heart. Aortic regurgitation is a condition where aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly and allows some blood to leak back into the heart chamber. Symptoms of aortic regurgitation may include fatigue and shortness of breath. The preferred treatment for severe aortic regurgitation is aortic valve replacement surgery.

NCT ID: NCT01757665 Active, not recruiting - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

ProspeCtive, nOn-randoMized, MulticENter Clinical Evaluation of Edwards Pericardial Bioprostheses With a New Tissue Treatment Platform (COMMENCE)

COMMENCE
Start date: December 11, 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The objective of this trial is to confirm that the modifications to tissue processing, valve sterilization and packaging do not raise any new questions of safety and effectiveness in subjects who require replacement of their native or prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.

NCT ID: NCT01456975 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Aortic Insufficiency

Extravalvular Procedure for Surgical Treatment of Ascending Aorta Aneurism

EPSTAAA
Start date: January 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators expect that the using of prothesis with sinuses has more benefits for long term competence and condition of aortic valve than the using of straight prothesis.