View clinical trials related to Aneurysm.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the most effective timing for clipping in adults with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. It will also assess the safety of performing the surgery at different times of early period after the aneurysm has ruptured. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does ultra-early surgical intervention ( less than 24 hours of rupture) improve survival rates compared to delayed surgery (24 to 72 hours after rupture)? 2. What are the complication rates associated with early versus delayed surgical intervention? Researchers will compare clipping in ultra-early period to surgery in early period to see if timing affects the outcomes for treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Participants will: - Be randomly assigned to undergo surgical clipping either within 24 hours of rupture or between 24 hours to 72 hours after the rupture. - Visit the clinic for follow-up assessments at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. - Keep a diary of their symptoms, neurological function, and any complications they experience post-surgery.
DTFI is a single-center, prospective cohort study aimed at evaluating the hemodynamics of in-stent stenosis after flow diverter implantation, seeking to identify the threshold effect of blood flow in stenosis.
This study will evaluate the impact of complex thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in coagulation during the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing omplex thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
The prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) in the population is about 2%-7%, and once it ruptures and bleeds, the rate of disability and death is extremely high, with 10%-15% of patients dying suddenly before they can seek medical attention, 35% of first-time bleeders, and 60%-80% of second-time bleeders. Survivors are often disabled. Therefore, there is a broad consensus that UIA with surgical indication should be aggressively intervened. The efficacy and safety of flow diverter (FD) in the treatment of UIA has been confirmed by many large clinical trials. Currently, FD placement for UIA is performed under general anesthesia (GA) in most centers, however, some studies have observed that FD placement under local anesthesia (LA) is not as effective as FD placement under general anesthesia and have demonstrated the feasibility of FD placement under local anesthesia (LA) with high technical success rates and low perioperative complication rates and mortality. However, the retrospective design and relatively limited sample size of the above studies may introduce significant bias and affect the confidence of the conclusions. Therefore, the present trial was designed as a randomized controlled trial with the aim of comparing the safety and efficacy of GA and LA in UIA patients undergoing FD placement. The results of this study will help inform future multicenter trials to validate the impact of anesthesia choice on the safety and efficacy in UIA patients undergoing FD placement.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about a new device, named the LIFE device, to treat people with aneurysms (swellings) in the aorta (large, main blood vessel that delivers blood from the heart to the body). The main questions this trial aims to answer are: - If the LIFE device works to treat aortic aneurysms - What medical problems participants have when the LIFE device is used Participants will undergo treatment with the LIFE device and thereafter at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years have their pulses checked, bloodwork to check kidney function (BUN and serum creatinine), and a CT scan of the aneurysm area.
Vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms (VBDAs) are one of the most important causes of stroke in young and middle-aged people, and the natural history of VBDAs is complex and varied, often leading to high rates of disability and mortality. For some patients with VBDAs who are not suitable for surgical entrapment and intervention, pharmacologic therapy may be used to slow the progression of VBDAs. Metformin (MET) has been shown to act as an anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress and improve vascular endothelial function by inhibiting smooth muscle cell phenotypic transformation, proliferation, migration and apoptosis, thereby reducing the incidence of intracranial aneurysms and rupture rates, and MET may be a suitable candidate. Inflammatory response plays an important role in the occurrence, development and rupture of VBDAs. Inflammatory response in the aneurysm wall can cause endothelial and smooth muscle cell injury and apoptosis, leading to degenerative changes in the vessel wall and increasing the risk of rupture of VBDAs. High-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI), which can clearly show the structure of the vessel wall and reflect the active degree of inflammatory reaction in the aneurysm wall, has been widely used in the assessment of intracranial aneurysm instability. In this study, we propose to conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized study to investigate whether MET reduces the degree of aneurysm wall inflammatory response in VBDAs by performing HR-VWI scans in patients with VBDAs and obtaining quantitative parameters reflecting the inflammatory response of the aneurysm wall.
Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) repair is offered when the risk of rupture exceeds the risk of surgery. Women (versus men) have a four-fold higher risk of AAA rupture but almost double the operative mortality. It is unknown whether the current 5.5cm diameter AAA repair threshold, derived from randomised trials including only 4% women, is applicable to women. Therefore, should women have their aneurysms repaired electively at smaller diameters than men to improve their AAA-related survival and quality of life? WARRIORS is an international randomised controlled trial of early elective endovascular repair versus routine surveillance in women (n=1112) with small asymptomatic AAA (4-5.4cm diameter), nested within a registry of non-participants. The surveillance group will be offered repair for rupture or upon reaching the 5.5cm threshold. Randomisation will be 1:1 stratified by country, age, and aneurysm diameter. The trial is powered for aneurysm-related mortality or rupture at 5 years. Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years is a major secondary outcome. Other outcomes include: operative mortality and complications, anxiety, major cardiovascular adverse events, and cost-effectiveness. Quality-of-life and anxiety questionnaires and "standard-of-care" using routine data will be collected. The trial aims to progress health equity through provision of evidence for sex-specific clinical guidelines for AAA repair.
After a subarachnoid haemorrhage, complications are common and increase the overall rate of disability and death from the condition. Despite some advances in preventing, detecting and treating these complications, the rates of complications and associated risks remain high. Further research into ways to reduce complications of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a technique where a small handheld device is attached to an earpiece which stimulates the nerves to the ear. This is given for short periods and may help improve blood flow and reduce inflammation in the brain. The intervention has been safely used and licensed in seizures, headache and severe depression. This study will look to see if it is feasible and tolerable to have tVNS twice daily for 5 days after subarachnoid haemorrhage, and whether it can help reduce the risk of complications from subarachnoid haemorrhage. The participant will be randomly allocated to receive either tVNS or a dummy intervention, known as sham. The researchers will collect some personal and clinical details such as diagnosis, medications, age, blood test results, as well as some details about the subarachnoid haemorrhage. The researchers will also complete brief questionnaires with the participant to assess symptoms. They will take measurements of heart rate, pupil response, and brain activity using a cap. The participant will then be randomly allocated to either receive the tVNS or sham intervention. Next, the research team will apply the earpiece to their ear twice a day for 45 minutes, for a total of 5 days. At the end of the 5-day study period, the intervention will be complete. The researchers will arrange a follow-up meeting on discharge and at 6 weeks, to assess the participants symptoms and recovery. Previous studies have shown that tVNS is safe and well tolerated, including a recent review of tVNS studies which evaluated the side effects experienced by 1322 patients receiving tVNS. The main side effects include localised tingling/numbness/pain/redness around the ear (17%), headaches (3%), dizziness (1%), facial droop (1%), nausea (1%), nasal discharge (2%). Rarely, palpitations or a slow heart rate may occur. They will continue to receive full medical treatment and observation alongside the study. They are free to withdraw from this study if they find it too demanding on top of their other activities.
The goal of this registry is to evaluate the semibranch in branched endovascular arotic repair, which is a new tool in endovascular branched aortic repair.
A prospective, multi-center, single-arm, open-label, observational post-market real-world registry. The expected duration of the study is 8 years (including up to 5-years' follow-up). Each subject will be followed in accordance with the standard of care (SOC) at each participating hospital.