View clinical trials related to Anesthesia.
Filter by:This is a noninferiority study designed to examine whether conscious sedation with midazolam alone results in efficacy and safety that is not inferior to the combination of midazolam and fentanyl. English-speaking patients ≥18 years old and ≤75 years old presenting for GI endoscopy planned with conscious sedation using midazolam and fentanyl, will be randomized 1:1 to single agent sedation with midazolam or combination sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Participants will be blinded to the choice of sedation. Sedation quality and adverse events will be measured with a validated patient-centered measure of procedural sedation quality, the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) [Leffler, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):194-203]. Endoscopic quality measures in the 2 study groups will be collected by retrospective chart review, as an additional metric to ensure the quality of the procedure is not compromised by the choice of sedation.
To compare the effectiveness of nebulization versus airway nerve block technique to achieve upper airway anesthesia for diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy under moderate sedation.
the aim of the study is to assess the effect of intralipid as regard efficiency in decreasing myocardial ischemia , given during preconditioning in off pump coronary artery revascularization
Title: Conduct of anaesthesia during acute ischaemic stroke: a retrospective case series of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Design: This study will be a retrospective consecutive observational case series
Objective: to compare the effect of alveolar recruitment manouver through stepwise increase and decrease in airway pressure or sustained 30 secondes 30 cmH2O continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac stroke volume estimated by oesophageal doppler in preload independent anesthetized patients scheduled for surgery.
Even decade ago it was believed that the choice method of anesthesia did not affect the course of the oncological process, but recent evidence has begun to emerge that inhalation anesthesia vs TIVA is associated with a higher number of adverse outcomes. Apparently, it makes sense to conduct mRCT in order to assess the effect of IA on immune system in patients operated on for breast cancer comprehensively. The results of that kind of RCT may finally give us an answer whether the choice of anesthesia affects the immune status of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The evaluation of complications and long-term survival will allow to recommend to use or not to use IA for this type of surgery. Objective: The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Anorectal manometry requires that the patient be able to respond to command and not receive any medications which could alter muscle tone or motility. In the pediatric population, anorectal manometry can be psychologically challenging to parents and their child, as it is traditionally performed without adjuvant sedation or anesthesia. Sedatives and anesthesia can alter motility and smooth muscle activity, as well as render it difficult or impossible for the child to follow commands required of the study. Patient or parent non-compliance, inability to follow commands or to tolerate the procedure often renders the study invalid or impossible to complete. Dexmedetomidine is a sedative who's effect on anorectal musculature has not been studied nor determined. It would be important to determine whether it spares smooth muscle function, as it would provide a viable option to provide sedation to children while still preserving their ability to respond to command. The primary objective of this study is to examine the effects of dexmedetomidine on gastrointestinal smooth muscle by observing changes in anorectal manometry before and after dexmedetomdine administration.
To evaluate the surgical stress response in anterior cruciate ligament repair with an adductor canal block versus patient controlled endovenous analgesia.
Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) is an anesthesia protocol that does not use morphine, and is increasingly used routinely. Indeed, this protocol would theoretically allow a better post-operative analgesic control, a lower incidence of post-operative complications (e.g. post-operative nausea and vomiting). In the end, it would also allow a better overall post-operative recovery and a decrease in the incidence of chronic post-operative pain. Nevertheless, the literature is poor on this issue and no randomized controlled study has evaluated the effect of the use of this type of anesthesia protocol on postoperative recovery.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of EpiFaith® syringe on the establishment of successful epidural labor analgesia, change of elapsed time for identification of epidural space, and learning curve of CA-1 residents.