Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05342272 |
Other study ID # |
NP2789 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 3
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 22, 2017 |
Est. completion date |
October 30, 2018 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2022 |
Source |
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Background. Xerostomia is estimated to affect up to 50% of the adult population and
especially the elderly suffer from dry mouth sensation. Our aim was to compare the efficacy
of GUM® Hydral® Moisturizing Gel and Biotene® Oral Balance Gel in dry mouth sensation
reduction.
Study design and Methods. Forty patients, reporting dry mouth sensation between 4 to 10 on a
0 (no discomfort) to 10 (extreme discomfort) scale, were divided in two parallel groups
respectively treated with GUM® Hydral® and Biotene® Gel following a stratified randomization
list (t0). Patients and the research assistants were blinded to group assignment. Patients
underwent measurements of unstimulated and stimulated whole saliva flow and weekly (t1, t2,
t3, t4) were asked to fill in a patient questionnaire and daily a journal to evaluate the dry
mouth symptoms and the subjective perception of changes in the symptoms during one month of
treatment. After data collection (t1-t4), patients were medically followed over the next six
months in order to detect any long-term side effects (t5).
Description:
After clinical history analysis subjects were randomized, using a stratified randomization
list which considered as main prognostic factor the presence of a systemic pathology/drug
assumption responsible for the onset of xerostomia, into 2 parallel groups: one group of 20
patients receiving GUM® Hydral® Moisturizing Gel (test group); one group of 20 patients
receiving Biotene® Oral Balance Gel (control group).
In order to guarantee the allocation concealment, the randomization list was prepared after
patient inclusion in the study by a centralized office, responsible for the integrity of the
whole randomization protocol, and after that treatment products presented in kits were
distributed to each patient. Blinding of the evaluators and patients was obtained using the
same white anonymous packages for both tested products. The stratification was obtained
separating the patients in two groups, with and without the presence of a systemic
pathology/drug assumption responsible for the xerostomia onset, and then generating two
separated randomized lists.
At the beginning of the trial (t0) each patient received a print-out summarizing the
instructions for use of the products: they were instructed to apply during a 28 days
treatment period 1 to 2 cm of gel to gums, oral mucosa membrane and tongue, repeating as many
times as necessary, and to brush their teeth with GUM® Technique® Pro soft compact toothbrush
(Sunstar Europe S.A., Etoy, Switzerland) using GUM® Hydral® Toothpaste (Sunstar Europe S.A.,
Etoy, Switzerland) at least twice a day. The first application was done by the participants
themselves under the supervision of the same operator that provided them both oral and
written usage instructions. They had to refrain from using any other commercial mouthrinse,
toothpaste or saliva supplements during the trial and they were asked to complete a "patient
questionnaire" at the same time of the day (in the morning, at the hospital prior to their
clinical examination) at t0, t1 (after 1st week), t2 (2nd week), t3 (3rd week) and at the end
of the trial, t4 (4th week), and a "daily journal".
The "patient questionnaire" was used to record the severity of the dry mouth sensation and
changes in the symptoms (thanks to a VAS scale and dichotomous variables). It also contained
questions to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) improvement (psychological impact and social
well-being), the convenience of use and overall feeling (at t4), and the organoleptic
properties of the tested products.
In the "daily journal", patients indicated on a dedicated calendar the times of product use,
they reported their subjective sensation of oral dryness 3 times a day (morning, around 12 AM
- 2 PM, evening) on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (well lubricated mouth) to
10 (worst possible dry mouth feeling), and they answered the following two questions (once a
day at the same time): "How many minutes after the use of the gel did you feel dry mouth
relief?" and "How long (expressed in minutes) did the dry mouth relief last (after the use of
the gel)?" to record the perceived speed and duration of effects of the products and their
pleasantness of use.
The salivary flow rate is the amount of saliva produced by salivary glands in the time unit
and it can be divided into unstimulated (which is independent of the presence of stimuli as
food and chewing) and stimulated (secreted in response to sensory stimulation, gustatory and
masticatory mainly)40.
At t0, after one hour of abstinence from drinking, eating and smoking, the patients were
characterized by means of an unstimulated (Whole Resting Saliva - WRS) and a stimulated
(Whole Stimulated Saliva - WSS) whole saliva flow determination using the spitting method
between 11.00 and 12.00 a.m. under controlled temperature and humidity conditions37,39,40,41.
WRS was determined collecting saliva produced during a time span of 5 minutes37;
subsequently, WSS was determined collecting saliva produced during a time span of 1 minute,
after 5 minutes chewing a paraffin soft ball.
The enrolled subjects were submitted to a rigid protocol of behavioral norms in preparation
for salivary collection37,38,39,40,41. Patients were advised to keep a relaxed attitude and
not to practice sports and/or physical efforts in the two days prior to the salivary
collection37,41. On the sampling day, participants had to be free from symptoms of fever
and/or cold; if they were hungry or thirsty, they could eat or drink water, but immediately
afterwards they had to brush their teeth with a provided toothpaste37. During the collection
periods, subjects remained comfortably seated and swallowed residual saliva present in the
mouth before the beginning of tests37. Then, with the head down and the mouth slightly open,
saliva was allowed to drip from the lower lip into a pre-weight, dry, deionized and
sterilized plastic test tube37.
At t0, t1, t2, t3, and t4 the same operator, blind regarding patient treatment group
assignment, completed the ROAG (Revised Oral Assessment Guide) scale and reported any local
irritation or allergic reaction caused by the product. In case of changes in medication
assumption changes during the study period, patients were excluded from the sample.
After the conclusion of the data collection, patients were medically followed in the
subsequent six months in order to recognize any long-term side effect appearance (t5).