View clinical trials related to Wound Infection.
Filter by:The aim of the present study is to analyse feasibility, safety and Incisional Hernia rate using a prophylactic sub lay non-absorbable mesh [Parietex Progrip (Medtronic) ] in order to prevent Incisional Hernia following midline emergent laparotomy in clean and clean-contaminated wounds.
The study aims to assess the beneficial value of vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.05% before cesarean delivery of cases in labor in reduction of postoperative endometritis, fever and wound complications compared to no preparation or using saline only.
Time of showering after surgery is still a controversial issue for surgical patients and health professionals. It has been reported that patients should not shower until sutures are removed since traditionally showering is thought to cause infections after surgery. However, not showering after surgery not only has a negative effect on patient comfort but also brings about the risk of infections. Sternal wound infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery through median sternotomy are one of the important, life-threatening complications. For this reasons, the investigators researched the advantages and disadvantages of showering for postoperative sternal wound infections, pain due to sternotomy and patient comfort and satisfaction.
Randomised cinical trial in demmita General Hospital.300 obese women pregnant with gestational age >38 wk ,theire age range from (25-35) years and BMI between (30 -40) undergoing elective cesarean section were randomised into 3 groups (100 patients in each group)and compare the role of subcutaneous tissue closure in post cesarean section wound complications. 3groups are: A- interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue without drain. B-interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue with drain. C-non closure of subcutaneous tissue. All womenu nder going CS with Pfannenstiel incision were considered to be eligible if time allowed informed consent before the surgery
This study will determine the tissue penetration of the novel tetracycline antibiotic, omadacycline (Nuzyra, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), into the extracellular, interstitial fluid of soft tissue in diabetic patients with lower limb wound infections. Penetration will be compared with a group of healthy volunteer control participants.
Background. The Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program in Catalonia (VINCat) monitors SSI in elective colorectal surgery since 2007 in 56 hospitals (7.5 million population). These hospitals perform active and prospective standardized surveillance of elective colorectal resections. Post-discharge surveillance is mandatory up to 30 days after surgery. Between 2007 and 2015, the SSI rate did not change significantly, with a cumulated incidence of 5,491 SSI in a total of 29,006 interventions (19%). In 2015, a working group of VINCat specialists and surgeons from the Catalan Society of Surgery was set up to formulate a specific bundle of SSI preventative measures for colorectal surgery. Aim. To analyse the effect of a specific bundle for SSI prevention in elective colorectal surgery. Methods. In 2016, a bundle of six preventative measures was recommended to the VINCat hospitals. Bundle measures were: systemic and oral antibiotic prophylaxis, mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), laparoscopic surgery, maintenance of normothermia, and the use of a double-ring wound retractor. The results of SSI before and after the implementation of the bundle are compared. The results are analysed using the chi-square test (statistical significance p <0.05).
Introduction: Although negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is likely advantageous for wound healing, the efficacy and safety of its prophylactic use remain unclear. We performed a Randomized Control Trial to assess the usefulness of postoperative NPWT in reduction of postoperative wound healing complications and surgical site infections after diverting ileostomy closure, in the group of patients previously operated for colorectal resection due to cancer. Materials & Methods: Prospective, randomized study will be conducted. Patients with past history of colorectal cancer laparoscopic surgery with protective loop ileostomy scheduled to undergo ileostomy closure with primary wound closure will be randomly divided into groups with or without NPWT. The primary endpoint are incidence of wound related complications (WRC) (wound healing complications witch required surgical intervention other than suture removal or dressing changing). The secondary endpoints are incidences of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) and length of complete wound healing (CWH). Cost analysis will also be performed. In first step of this study between January 2016 and December 2018 we will asses the usefulness of one of the NPWT devices (NANOVA KCI) in prevention of WHC in established group. The second part of the study will be performed in 2 centers between January 2019 and December 2021. In this step we want to compere other NPWT devices in the same application and to confirm single center outcomes .
The overarching aim of this research project is to prevent orthopedic implant-associated infections. This study aims to investigate if photodynamic therapy has an effect on bacterial skin colonization and decrease number of colonizing bacteria associated with sebaceous and sweat glands in order to improve skin antisepsis strategies for the prevention of surgical site infections.
Wound infections are a frequent complication in abdominal surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the antiseptic solution 0.04 % polyhexanide (serasept) may reduce occurrence of postoperative wound infections compared to NaCL (saline) solution in a prospective randomized setting.
Background During anaesthesia for repair of a broken hip, many patients experience low blood pressure. There have been many studies showing that patients who experience low blood pressure during anaesthesia are at increased risk of sustaining kidney or heart damage, strokes, having a post-operative infection, or dying. During anaesthesia, in most cases blood pressure is monitored using a cuff which inflates on the arm (the 'normal' way blood pressure is measured in a GP practice or hospital ward). This gives a reading each time the cuff goes up and down, every 3-5 minutes typically. There is a less well used way to measure blood pressure, using an additional cuff on the finger which gives a constant, continuous measure of blood pressure. We think that using this monitor, rather than the 'standard' monitor, will mean that low blood pressure is recognised more quickly, therefore treated more quickly, and will lead to patients having less exposure to dangerously low blood pressures. If this is the case, we hope that it will reduce how often patients experience kidney or heart damage, have an infection after surgery, suffer a stroke, and reduce the risk of death. Methodology To test this, we would need to run a large clinical trial comparing the continuous monitor to the standard monitor. This would be expensive and involve a great deal of work in a large number of hospitals, and so first we wish to determine whether the trial we would like to run is practical, and possible to deliver in the real world. To do this we plan to run the trial first on a small-scale feasibility (pilot) study, where we will recruit 30 patients, half of whom will have the standard monitor, and half of whom will have the continuous monitor. We will see what proportion of the patients who could enter the trial actually do so and complete it, and use it as an opportunity to iron out problems with the trial. If we find it is possible to run the trial on a small scale, we will apply for funding to run a full study. This will aim to answer the question of whether the continuous monitor improves the patient outcomes which were agreed during development with the patient public involvement group locally; rate of kidney damage, heart damage, stroke, post-operative infections, risk of death, and hospital length-of-stay. Expected outcomes and implications. We anticipate we will find the trial to be feasible with amendments to the way it is run, and if this is the case, we will apply to run the full scale trial. If this shows that using the continuous monitor improves the patient outcomes above, then it would represent new, significant evidence that may lead to the NHS adopting it's use as 'standard care' during anaesthesia for repair of a broken hip, and would like lead to similar trials in other operations where patients may benefit in a similar way.