Topical Timolol: a Comparison of Surgical Outcomes

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The use of topical beta-blockers, such as 0.25% timolol, in promoting wound healing is currently emerging in the literature. The investigators will enroll 30 participants in a split scar study who have their skin cancer surgically removed resulting in a linear wound equal to or longer than 4cm. The objective of this randomized study is to determine the safety and efficacy of 0.25% timolol in promoting wound healing in wound closed primarily greater than or equal to 1.5 cm.

Clinical Trial Description

Topical timolol has shown in case series to improve healing time and cosmetic outcome of ulcerated or non-healing wounds with improved cosmetic outcome when compared to standard wound care. There is currently no research detailing if this improved outcome is applicable when used with wounds approximated with sutures. Mechanism of action is not fully elucidated but improved keratinocyte migration and suppression of the inflammatory cascade is thought to improve wound healing. Skin cancer surgeries have morbidity for patients as they are often in cosmetically sensitive locations. Improving cosmetic outcomes of surgical scars could improve patient outcomes and overall satisfaction. The goal of this study is to determine if topical timolol will improve long-term cosmetic outcomes of surgical scars and thereby improve patient outcomes. There is great variability in how a surgical site heals depending on patient factors as well as surgical site location. The investigators will perform a split scar study to allow each patient to be their own control to account for this variability. To assess the efficacy and safety of topically applied 0.25% timolol in promoting wound healing in surgical primary linear wound greater than or equal to 4cm versus standard of care (SOC) by: 1. Evaluating cosmetic outcomes of surgical wounds in terms of blinded physician and patient assessment at 30 days and 90days following suture removal 2. Evaluating patient discomfort by patient questionnaire. 3. Determining the side effects associated to 0.25% topical timolol versus SOC; ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Wound Heal

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05114239
Study type	Interventional
Source	Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans
Contact	Taylor G Dickerson, MD
Phone	(504) 568-7110
Email	tgrif3@lsuhsc.edu
Status	Recruiting
Phase	Phase 2
Start date	April 7, 2021
Completion date	December 2022

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05023135` - DeepView SnapShot Portable (DV-SSP): Device Training Study
Recruiting	`NCT03459547` - Soft Peri-implant Tissue Around Different Abutment Materials	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05608187` - Evaluating Safety and Biological Effect on Wound Healing of ILP100-Topical in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03649308` - Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Compared to Traditional Care After Skin Grafting	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04596124` - Effectiveness and Tolerability of Fitostimoline Plus Cream and Gauze vs Connettivina Bio Plus Cream and Gauze	N/A
Completed	`NCT03285542` - Prospective Randomized Trial of Dermabond Prineo in Total Knee Arthroplasty	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05474911` - PILONIDAL SINUS: CONVENTIONAL CARE VERSUS NEGATIVE PRESSURE THERAPY.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05689775` - Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection With Robot-assisted Harvest of VRAM Flap
Recruiting	`NCT04849143` - The Effectiveness of Stingless Bee Honey (Kelulut Honey) Versus Gel in Diabetic Wound Bed Preparation	N/A
Completed	`NCT03596112` - The Difference in Wound Size Reduction Comparing Two Frequently Used Wound Dressings in Everyday Care	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05169814` - Micro/Nanobubbles (MNBs) for Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds	Early Phase 1
Completed	`NCT04545476` - Enhanced Secondary Intention Healing vs. Standard Secondary Intention Healing in Mohs Surgical Defects on the Head and Distal Lower Extremities	N/A
Completed	`NCT06020157` - Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05133570` - Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatment With Vista Care®, in Arterial Ulcers of the Lower Extremities
Recruiting	`NCT04901325` - Baricitinib in the Treatment of Adults With Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG)	Phase 2
Withdrawn	`NCT03668665` - Influencing Wound Healing Through the Application of Hyaluronic Acid With Perfluorodecalin and Physalis Angulata Extract After Split Skin Removal From the Thigh - A Study in "Split Wound Design"	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT03703479` - Effect of A-PRF After Removal of Wisdom Teeth	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03204851` - Microlyte Dressing in the Management of Wounds	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06117436` - Impact of Cilostazol Versus Cilostazol and Selenium Combination on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients	Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05618912` - Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.