View clinical trials related to Wound Heal.
Filter by:LASER therapy is potent physiotherapy modalities, providing better sternotomy healing for patients who have undergone CABG surgery, compared with traditional wound care management alone. HLLT and LLLT were found to be the most effective methods for sternotomy healing post-CABG surgery, with HLLT offering superior performance in the case of the high deep penetration and significance less time needed to deliver the same joules/ cm compared to LLLT used for the wound site.
This study compares the effectiveness of Gelatamp for intraoral wound closure after extraction of mandibular teeth.
Autologous hair transplantation involves follicle extraction, trimming, and implantation. Follicle trimming improves efficiency and postoperative appearance, resulting in the discarded tissue known as hair follicle-derived microtissue (HFMT). In a clinical case, HFMT homogenate was applied to the FUE donor area wound, resulting in reduced pain, relief from itching, and faster healing compared to conventional treatment. This study aims to compare the effects of HFMT on FUE donor area wound healing.
Objective: investigate The effect of combined red and infrared lasers on histopathology collagen formation in diabetic foot ulcer Participants: The forty five patients will assigned randomly into three equal groups, each group consist of 15 patients, group A received laser therapy in sequential mode, group B received laser therapy in separate mode and the control group C receive conventional wound care treatment
This four-week prospective clinical investigation will assess the safety and feasibility of a medical device without CE-marking. The medical device is a light-emitting-diode (LED) and is manufactured by VulCur MedTech Aps. Violet-blue light treatment is tested on a total of twenty-two patients with chronic wounds, divided into three groups, each group only receiving one dosage. Three dosages (low, medium and high) of violet-blue light treatment is tested. ID 1-7 are assigned to the low group, ID 8-15 are assigned to medium group and ID 16-22 are assigned to the high dosage group.
Patients will be randomized either to receive standard daily dressing or hydrocolloid dressing using a randomization generator. After closing the wound with the sutures,the scar will be covered by a hydrocolloid dressing, which will be left in place for 7 days(Experimental) or the standard dressing (Control) that will be covered with petrolatum jelly and bandaging during this time period, which has to be re-applied daily. Patients and dermatologic surgeons will then complete surveys 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days after surgery to evaluate the cosmetic appearance of these scars.
Objective: investigate the effect of combined 650 nm and infrared laser on chronic diabetic foot ulcer surface area. Participants: The forty five patients will assigned randomly into three equal groups, each group consist of 15 patients, group A received laser therapy in sequential mode, group B received laser therapy in separate mode and the control group C receive traditional wound care
This is a three arm study, comparing the Novadress, Mepilex Ag, and Xeroform Occlusive dressings for healing, drainage, and pain management. NovaDress is constructed of pure cellulose derived from tree pulp. Mepilex Ag is a antimicrobial foam dressing that absorbs low to moderate exudate and maintains a moist wound environment. Xeroform Occlusive Dressing is a fine-mesh gauze impregnated with a petrolatum blend, 3% bismuth tribromophenate.
This study will include 20 healthy subjects with intact skin on their lower legs that meet inclusion criteria. Participants will serve as their own control, by heating one leg and not the other. The radiofrequency device consists of a 4 by 6 inch heating pad connected to a temperature controller. Subjects will receive weekly treatments for 4 weeks, and will be re-evaluated 4 weeks after the last treatment to assess any tissue changes that continue after the treatments have concluded.
The study is a 56-day (8-week), randomized, controlled, examiner-blinded, parallel-design study of patients with existing Stage II or Stage III periodontitis. After eligibility determination, subjects will be randomized to the following groups: - Group 1: Full mouth periodontal debridement + Emanate Tray (treatment group) - Group 2: Full mouth periodontal debridement alone (control group) Patients will be evaluated at Baseline and on Days 14, 28, and 56 for primary endpoint and at baseline and on day 56 post-treatment for secondary (efficacy) endpoints.