Wound Closure Techniques Clinical Trial
Official title:
Undermining During Cutaneous Wound Closure: a Randomized Split Wound Comparative Effectiveness Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine whether undermining during cutaneous surgery improves scar cosmesis compared to wound closure without undermining.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether undermining during cutaneous surgery improves scar cosmesis compared to wound closure without undermining. Our aims are to compare outcomes using a split wound model, where half the wound is undermined and the other half is not. This will be measured via the physician observer scar assessment scale, a validated scar instrument and via wound width. Our hypothesis is that wound undermining will result in cosmetically superior wound outcomes. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02991755 -
Use of 5-0 Prolene Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02383186 -
Dermal Suturing Only Versus Layered Cutaneous Closure
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01352533 -
Closure Techniques and Scar Appearance
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02547077 -
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02550574 -
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate With Full-thickness Skin Grafts
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02062866 -
Evaluation of Purse-String Closure Vs Second Intention
|
N/A |