View clinical trials related to Vomiting.
Filter by:The purpose of this research study is to determine if the Enterra® Therapy System can decrease nausea and vomiting symptoms and improve the quality of life for patients with chronic nausea, with or without vomiting, that have normal gastric emptying.
General anesthesia for surgery can often lead to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Additionally, decreased or paralyzed bowel movements are among the most common complications following abdominal surgery, causing pain, abdominal distension, nausea, and vomiting, which can delay patient recovery and extend hospital stays. Therefore, meticulous perioperative management is crucial. In recent years, efforts have been made to reduce the burden of surgery, decrease postoperative complications, and promote rapid rehabilitation for a quicker return to daily life. These efforts also aim to reduce healthcare costs by shortening hospital stays and optimizing resources. Various interventions, such as early feeding, early removal of nasogastric tubes, and physical therapy, have been trialed in clinical settings to prevent prolonged bowel inactivity and paralysis. However, due to limited clinical efficacy, these methods are not routinely used. Recently, many researchers have reported the benefits of chewing gum in enhancing bowel motility and reducing PONV. However, there is limited research on the impact of chewing gum on PONV in robotic surgeries, which are considered less invasive compared to open or laparoscopic surgeries. Furthermore, there is particularly scarce research on the effects of preoperative gum chewing.
This study is planned as a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of the 4-7-8 breathing technique applied to patients after bariatric surgery on pain and nausea and vomiting. The research will be conducted on 60 patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 05.2024-12.2024. Randomization will be ensured for students who meet the inclusion criteria, and they will be divided into two random groups: the experimental group (n=30) and the control group (n=30). After obtaining consent with the "Informed Consent Form," patients who agree to participate in the study will have the "Patient Introduction Form" filled out by researchers, and they will be provided with training on the 4-7-8 breathing technique. Patients will be instructed to practice the 4-7-8 breathing technique once per hour (4 breaths) post-surgery. Pain and nausea-vomiting will be monitored at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours during their 24-hour hospital stay. The control group, after consenting with the "Informed Consent Form" the day before surgery, will have the "Patient Introduction Form" filled out by researchers, and their pain and nausea-vomiting status will be monitored at the same intervals during their hospital stay. No interventions will be made for the control group; they will receive routine nursing care during their hospital stay.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a major concern for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery (corrective jaw surgery). These symptoms affect up to 60% of jaw surgery patients and can be quite distressing. The mechanisms underlying PONV are complex, but it is thought that surgical site bleeding and blood pooling in the stomach is the primary stimulus in this type of surgery. Nasogastric (NG) tubes have been used to suction out pooled blood in the stomach (gastric decompression), in hopes of minimizing symptoms. However, new research shows that NG tube gastric decompression may not demonstrate any benefit, and may even worsen PONV. Our study aims to directly compare PONV in participants undergoing gastric decompression or not. Participants will be randomized into two groups, either no NG tube gastric decompression or NG tube gastric decompression throughout the surgery and removed approximately one hour postoperatively. It is hypothesized that there will be less PONV in the group that does not undergo gastric decompression. We hope that the results from this study will better patient outcomes for this common postoperative problem and guide future practices for NG tube gastric decompression in orthognathic surgery.
Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy represent one of the most common symptoms of pregnancy, affecting 35 to 91% of women. Most often, the symptoms are mild, without impairment of quality of life and disappear at the end of the first trimester. More severe forms constitute hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) (hyperemesis gravidarum). In approximately 35% of women, nausea and vomiting during pregnancy are disabling, alter daily life and professional activity and negatively affect family relationships. For 0.3 to 3.6% of pregnancies, this vomiting is uncontrollable and constitutes the main cause of hospitalization in the first trimester of pregnancy. Faced with the incomprehension and lack of knowledge of their illness, both in society and in the medical community, patient associations have been created in France to gain recognition for HG and raise awareness among caregivers and women about this illness and its consequences. Vomiting repeatedly for weeks, losing weight sometimes significantly, being weakened, no longer able to cope with daily life, family life and work, is what some women can experience while they are pregnant and that society tells them : "pregnancy is not an illness". Although HG is common, its real prevalence is unknown, particularly in France, because there have been few studies involving small samples. A population study is desirable because it is likely that the prevalence of these pregnancy aches differs depending on the country. This subject is important because vomiting during pregnancy has an impact on women's quality of life and their desire to become pregnant again. The main objective of this observation study is to evaluate the prevalence of pregnancy-related nausea and/or vomiting (uncomplicated or with hyperemesis gravidarum), in the general population, in the first trimester of pregnancy. The secondary objectives are: - to assess the prevalence of pregnancy-related nausea and/or vomiting (uncomplicated or with hyperemesis gravidarum), in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, - to assess the prevalence of uncomplicated pregnancy-related nausea and/or vomiting in the three trimesters of pregnancy, - to evaluate the prevalence of hyperemesis gravidarum (with or without hospitalization) in the three trimesters of pregnancy, - to evaluate the prevalence of hyperemesis gravidarum requiring hospitalization in the three trimesters of pregnancy, - to evaluate the distribution of nausea and/or vomiting (mild, moderate and severe) according to the modified-PUQE score, in the three trimesters of pregnancy, - to evaluate the predictive factors for the occurrence of pregnancy-related nausea and/or vomiting (uncomplicated or with hyperemesis gravidarum) in the first trimester of pregnancy, - to assess health-related quality of life in the event of pregnancy-related nausea and/or vomiting (uncomplicated or with hyperemesis gravidarum), in the three trimesters of pregnancy, - and to compare health-related quality of life between women with pregnancy-related nausea and/or vomiting (uncomplicated or with hyperemesis gravidarum) and those without, in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common after surgery and impede rapid recovery after surgery. Patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal surgery are more likely to develop PONV due to the pneumoperitoneum, interruption of gastrointestinal system, delay of oral feeding, and nasogastric catheterization, as well as postoperative opioid analgesic requirement to control acute pain. Oliceridine is a novel selective μ-opioid agonist. It stimulates G protein signalling but is markedly less potent than morphine for β-arrestin recruitment; the latter contributes to opioid-related adverse events including PONV. It is postulated that G protein-biased agonists may deliver effective analgesia with fewer opioid-related adverse events. This randomized trial aimed to investigate whether oliceridine for patient-controlled analgesia can decrease the incidence of PONV in patients recovering from laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the impact of intrathecal dexmedetomidine in comparison with intravenous route in patients undergoing cesarean section. Alternate hypothesis :Dexmedetomidine is more effective when given intrathecally as adjuvant to bupivacaine in elective cesarean section Null Hypothesis: Dexmedetomidine is more effective when given intravenously as adjuvant to bupivacaine in elective cesarean section Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Study setting: Watim General Hospital Study Duration: 18 months after synopsis approval Sampling technique: Simple random sampling Sample Size: Using the Open Epi program, a sample size of 60 patients (30 in each group) was determined with a 95% confidence interval and 80% power. Inclusion Criteria: - Pregnant women between ages 18-35 years - Belongs to ASA class I or II - Subjected to elective C-section Exclusion Criteria: - Any history of gastrointestinal disease diabetes, thyroid disease, hypertension, obesity, or anemia - History of alcohol or drug abuse; - Major complications of pregnancy - Patients have contraindication to spinal block or allergic to any of drug
The aim of this clinical trial is to learn if Dimenhydrinate works to prevent postoperative nausea-vomiting in adult women who undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. The primary question is: Does Dimenhydrinate lower the proportion of postoperative nauseavomiting during the day 1 after surgery. Researcher will compare Dimenhydrinate to a placebo (a-look-alike substance that contains no drug) which will give intravenously when the patient come back to the ward, to see if Dimenhydrinate work to prevent nauseavomiting during the postoperative day1. All participants will receive standard treatment during pre-operative, intra-operative and the immediate post-operative periods. Participants will receive Dimenhydrinate or placebo only one dose after discharge from the recovery room. During the day 1 postoperative, participants will report their symptoms and keep a diary of the number of tmes they use additional anti-emetic drugs.
This study aims to validate the Alimetry® Gut-Brain Wellbeing Survey- Youth Version (AGBW-Y), a mental health scale developed for patients aged 12-17 years with chronic stomach symptoms.
The study team proposes a randomized, double-blind, RCT to address the following goal: to determine the relative efficacy and adverse event profile of fosaprepitant compared to the standard of care antiemetic ondansetron. Fosaprepitant and its active metabolite aprepitant are a relatively new class of antiemetic that exclusively acts in the central nervous system by blocking neurokinin (NK-1) which is a key signaling molecule in the centrally mediated aspects of the vomiting reflex. Currently, fosaprepitant and aprepitant both have only two United Stated Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approved indications for nausea and vomiting: chemotherapy-induced and postoperative. Neurokinin inhibitors are highly effective and generally well-tolerated. Therefore, this class of medication may be a more appropriate medication for the millions of patients with nausea and vomiting that seek care in EDs. Intravenous fosaprepitant is converted to the active metabolite aprepitant on the order of minutes and is significantly cheaper to procure at this time. The outcome for the efficacy analysis will be no need for additional medication to treat nausea and vomiting within 2 hours of investigational medication administration. The primary outcome for the tolerability analysis will be the development of any new symptom within 2 hours of medication administration.