Expiratory Muscle Strength Training and Phonation Resistance Training Exercises For Elderly Patients With Vocal Fold Atrophy

Voice Disorder Clinical Trial

Official title:

EMST And PhoRTE Training For Elderly Patients With Vocal Fold Atrophy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03696576
• Other study ID #: IRB00109224
• Secondary ID: PRO18040682
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 20, 2018
• Est. completion date: May 4, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: August 2021
• Source: Emory University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The larynx and vocal folds undergo many age-related changes in their physiology and structure that can lead to undesirable effects on the voice, with changes in the respiratory system compounding these deficits. These changes, also called presbyphonia, can have serious detrimental effects on the lives of elderly individuals. There are few studies that have evaluated the use of voice therapy treatment options for these patients. The primary aim of this study is to test whether the addition of expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) to a current, validated voice therapy protocol aimed at treating presbyphonia, (phonation resistance training, PhoRTE) can improve outcomes of therapy.

Description:

The purpose of this study is to test whether the addition of EMST to PhoRTE Voice Therapy is at least as effective as PhoRTE alone for improving acoustic, aerodynamic, and patient-reported outcomes in patients affected by age-related vocal fold atrophy. Voice therapy is often the first-line treatment for patients experiencing presbyphonia. Despite being the most common treatment for presbyphonia, scant literature exists on the efficacy of voice therapy for these patients. The current proposal aims to add to this growing body of literature. In general, studies of existing voice therapy programs for presbyphonia have demonstrated success in achieving improvement in aerodynamic (increased subglottal pressure), acoustic (increased shimmer, jitter, and decreased noise-to-harmonics ratio), and patient-centered outcomes (reduction in Voice Handicap Index scores, decreased phonatory effort). Ziegler et al. conducted a study comparing a standard voice therapy, Vocal Function Exercises (VFE) and Phonation Resistance Training Exercises (PhoRTE) and found that both therapies improved outcomes of voice-related quality of life, but only PhoRTE gave a statistically significant reduction in perceived phonatory effort. A specific therapy designed to address age-related changes to respiratory system is expiratory muscle strength training (EMST). EMST devices are loaded with a resistive spring which opens when a desired level of expiratory pressure is reached and maintained. Maintenance of consistent subglottal pressure is the foundation for phonation. EMST device training improves active expiratory muscle forces required for high-pressure activities such as long utterances or loud speech in vocally healthy individuals. When used in conjunction with traditional voice therapy, EMST use has also shown to increase maximum phonation time, maximum expiratory pressure, dynamic range, subglottal pressure, and perception of voice handicap in professional voice users over traditional voice therapy alone. The theoretical underpinnings for treatment of vocal fold atrophy with EMST are clear, as it addresses many of the common goals of treatment in patients with presbyphonia, but it has not yet been tested as a possible adjunctive treatment for patients undergoing voice therapy.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 24
• Est. completion date: May 4, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: May 4, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 65 Years to 95 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 65 or older
• Diagnosis of presbyphonia (vocal fold atrophy) made by a fellowship-trained laryngologist and a voice specialized speech language pathologist
• Willingness to be randomized to one of two treatments

Exclusion Criteria:

• Any concomitant laryngeal diagnoses or diseases known to affect voice function, including: amyloidosis, arytenoid dislocation, laryngeal cancer, cricoarytenoid fixation, vocal fold cyst(s), vocal nodules, vocal fold polyp(s), dysplasia, vocal fold fibrous mass(es), glottal web, vocal fold immobility, laryngeal stenosis, laryngocele, leukoplakia, Parkinson's disease, Reinke's edema, respiratory recurrent pneumonia, sarcoidosis, spasmodic dysphonia
• Any chronic lower airway disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, cystic fibrosis
• History of acute stroke
• Untreated hypertension
• Untreated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Atrophy
• Vocal Cord Atrophy
• Voice Disorder
• Voice Disorders

Intervention

Device:
• EMST
Training of the respiratory system muscles using the EMST device.

Behavioral:
• PhoRTE
Completing of PhoRTE voice therapy.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Emory University Hospital Midtown	Atlanta	Georgia
United States	University of Pittsburgh Voice Center	Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Emory University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (35)

Awan SN, Roy N, Jetté ME, Meltzner GS, Hillman RE. Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: Comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V. Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Sep;24(9):742-58. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2010.492446. — View Citation

Baker S, Davenport P, Sapienza C. Examination of strength training and detraining effects in expiratory muscles. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1325-33. — View Citation

Caskey CI, Zerhouni EA, Fishman EK, Rahmouni AD. Aging of the diaphragm: a CT study. Radiology. 1989 May;171(2):385-9. — View Citation

Davids T, Klein AM, Johns MM 3rd. Current dysphonia trends in patients over the age of 65: is vocal atrophy becoming more prevalent? Laryngoscope. 2012 Feb;122(2):332-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.22397. Epub 2012 Jan 17. — View Citation

Enright PL, Kronmal RA, Higgins MW, Schenker MB, Haponik EF. Prevalence and correlates of respiratory symptoms and disease in the elderly. Cardiovascular Health Study. Chest. 1994 Sep;106(3):827-34. — View Citation

Etter NM, Hapner ER, Barkmeier-Kraemer JM, Gartner-Schmidt JL, Dressler EV, Stemple JC. Aging Voice Index (AVI): Reliability and Validity of a Voice Quality of Life Scale for Older Adults. J Voice. 2019 Sep;33(5):807.e7-807.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 May 7. — View Citation

Fairbanks G. Voice and articulation drill book. 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row; 1960.

Gartner-Schmidt J, Rosen C. Treatment success for age-related vocal fold atrophy. Laryngoscope. 2011 Mar;121(3):585-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.21122. Epub 2010 Aug 3. — View Citation

Gillespie AI, Dastolfo C, Magid N, Gartner-Schmidt J. Acoustic analysis of four common voice diagnoses: moving toward disorder-specific assessment. J Voice. 2014 Sep;28(5):582-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 May 28. — View Citation

Golub JS, Chen PH, Otto KJ, Hapner E, Johns MM 3rd. Prevalence of perceived dysphonia in a geriatric population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Nov;54(11):1736-9. — View Citation

Gorman S, Weinrich B, Lee L, Stemple JC. Aerodynamic changes as a result of vocal function exercises in elderly men. Laryngoscope. 2008 Oct;118(10):1900-3. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31817f9822. — View Citation

Gregory ND, Chandran S, Lurie D, Sataloff RT. Voice disorders in the elderly. J Voice. 2012 Mar;26(2):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.10.024. Epub 2011 May 6. — View Citation

Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316. Review. — View Citation

Janssens JP, Pache JC, Nicod LP. Physiological changes in respiratory function associated with ageing. Eur Respir J. 1999 Jan;13(1):197-205. Review. — View Citation

Kempster GB, Gerratt BR, Verdolini Abbott K, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Hillman RE. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009 May;18(2):124-32. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017). Epub 2008 Oct 16. — View Citation

Kim J, Sapienza CM. Implications of expiratory muscle strength training for rehabilitation of the elderly: Tutorial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 Mar-Apr;42(2):211-24. Review. — View Citation

Kost K, Parham K. Presbyphonia: What can be done? Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):108-110. — View Citation

Laciuga H, Rosenbek JC, Davenport PW, Sapienza CM. Functional outcomes associated with expiratory muscle strength training: narrative review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(4):535-46. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.03.0076. Review. — View Citation

Marmor S, Horvath KJ, Lim KO, Misono S. Voice problems and depression among adults in the United States. Laryngoscope. 2016 Aug;126(8):1859-64. doi: 10.1002/lary.25819. Epub 2015 Dec 21. — View Citation

Murry T. Subglottal pressure and airflow measures during vocal fry phonation. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Sep;14(3):544-51. — View Citation

Nam DH, Lim JY, Ahn CM, Choi HS. Specially programmed respiratory muscle training for singers by using respiratory muscle training device (Ultrabreathe). Yonsei Med J. 2004 Oct 31;45(5):810-7. — View Citation

Palmer AD, Newsom JT, Rook KS. How does difficulty communicating affect the social relationships of older adults? An exploration using data from a national survey. J Commun Disord. 2016 Jul-Aug;62:131-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 22. — View Citation

Polkey MI, Harris ML, Hughes PD, Hamnegärd CH, Lyons D, Green M, Moxham J. The contractile properties of the elderly human diaphragm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 May;155(5):1560-4. — View Citation

Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004 Sep;114(9):1549-56. — View Citation

Roy N, Stemple J, Merrill RM, Thomas L. Epidemiology of voice disorders in the elderly: preliminary findings. Laryngoscope. 2007 Apr;117(4):628-33. — View Citation

Sapienza CM, Wheeler K. Respiratory muscle strength training: functional outcomes versus plasticity. Semin Speech Lang. 2006 Nov;27(4):236-44. Review. — View Citation

Sauder C, Roy N, Tanner K, Houtz DR, Smith ME. Vocal function exercises for presbylaryngis: a multidimensional assessment of treatment outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010 Jul;119(7):460-7. — View Citation

Skloot GS. The Effects of Aging on Lung Structure and Function. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017 Nov;33(4):447-457. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Aug 19. Review. — View Citation

Smitheran JR, Hixon TJ. A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production. J Speech Hear Disord. 1981 May;46(2):138-46. — View Citation

Statistics FIFoAR. Older Americans 2010: Key Indicators of Well-Being. US Government Printing Office. 2010.

Takano S, Kimura M, Nito T, Imagawa H, Sakakibara K, Tayama N. Clinical analysis of presbylarynx--vocal fold atrophy in elderly individuals. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010 Aug;37(4):461-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Dec 28. — View Citation

Tay EY, Phyland DJ, Oates J. The effect of vocal function exercises on the voices of aging community choral singers. J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):672.e19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jun 19. — View Citation

Thomas LB, Harrison AL, Stemple JC. Aging thyroarytenoid and limb skeletal muscle: lessons in contrast. J Voice. 2008 Jul;22(4):430-50. Epub 2007 Jan 22. Review. — View Citation

Wingate JM, Brown WS, Shrivastav R, Davenport P, Sapienza CM. Treatment outcomes for professional voice users. J Voice. 2007 Jul;21(4):433-49. Epub 2006 Apr 3. — View Citation

Ziegler A, Verdolini Abbott K, Johns M, Klein A, Hapner ER. Preliminary data on two voice therapy interventions in the treatment of presbyphonia. Laryngoscope. 2014 Aug;124(8):1869-76. doi: 10.1002/lary.24548. Epub 2014 Jan 29. — View Citation

* Note: There are 35 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) Score	The Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) is a validated assessment instrument that quantifies patient perceptions of his or her own voice handicap. A lower score on the VHI-10 indicates perception of a lesser voice handicap than a high score. Scores range from 0 to 40.	At each study visit through study completion; Time 0 (therapy visit 1-Baseline), follow-up week 1 (therapy visit 2), follow-up week 2 (therapy visit 3),follow-up week 3 (therapy visit 4), follow-up week 5 (follow up visit)
Secondary	AVI Score at Baseline and Follow up (5 Weeks)	The Aging Voice Index (AVI) is a validated instrument that measures quality of life in older adults with voice disorders. A higher score indicates worse quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 92.	At initial therapy visit (Baseline) and final follow up-visit (Follow up - week 5)
Secondary	Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)	Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP) was measured using a handheld manometer (Micro Direct Respiratory Pressure Meter, MicroRPM, Med-Electronics, Beltsville, MD, United States) at baseline and after 5 weeks of therapy. Participants were instructed to blow with maximum force into the MicroRPM device over 10 trials, and the participant's best three trials were used to calculate their average MEP.	At initial therapy visit (Baseline) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Phonatory Airflow in Speech at Baseline and 5 Weeks	Aerodynamic measures were collected and analyzed via the Phonatory Aerodynamic System 6600 (PAS; PENTAX Medical, Montvale, NJ, United States) using the first four sentences of the Rainbow Passage. Aerodynamic measures included mean airflow during voicing and number of breaths taken. The PAS captured phonatory aerodynamic functioning using a pneumotach coupled to a facemask, with external microphone. During speech, expired air flows through the pneumotach, which consists of a stainless-steel mesh screen with pressure transducers on either side. The system calculates the pressure difference across the screen to determine airflow rate. The microphone is positioned at the end of the pneumotach and internally calibrated per system specifications to represent a mouth-to-microphone distance of 15 cm. The participant sat with the facemask held snugly over their nose and mouth while they read the first fou	At initial therapy visit (Baseline) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Number of Breaths at Baseline and Follow up (5 Weeks)	Aerodynamic measurement: mean number of breaths in reading of a standard passage (The Rainbow Passage).	At initial therapy visit (Baseline) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Mean Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) Measurements While Reading Functional Phrases at Baseline and 5 Weeks	Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) is a multifactorial estimate of dysphonia severity that correlates with an auditory perceptual rating of overall voice severity using a 0-100 visual analog scale. Components of the algorithm include the cepstral peak prominence and its standard deviation, the low to high spectral ratio and its standard deviation. Typically, CSID limits are 0-100, but very severe voices may exceed 100, and very periodic, normal voices may be less than 0.	Baseline (At initial therapy visit) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) Measurements at Baseline and 5 Weeks	Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) is a multifactorial estimate of dysphonia severity that correlates with an auditory perceptual rating of overall voice severity using a 0-100 visual analog scale. Components of the algorithm include the cepstral peak prominence and its standard deviation, the low to high spectral ratio and its standard deviation. Typically, CSID limits are 0-100, but very severe voices may exceed 100, and very periodic, normal voices may be less than 0.	Baseline (At initial therapy visit) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Duration of Standard Reading Passage at Baseline and Follow up (5 Weeks)	Aerodynamic measurement; mean duration to complete the reading of a standard passage (The Rainbow Passage).	At initial therapy visit (Baseline) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Cepstral Peak Prominence at Baseline and 5 Weeks Follow up	Acoustic measurement: Cepstral Peak Prominence and its standard deviation while reading functional phrases.	At initial therapy visit (Baseline) and final follow up-visit (after week 5)
Secondary	Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) Fundamental Frequency (F0) at Baseline and Follow up (5 Weeks)	Acoustic measurement: CPP F0 while reading functional phrases.	At initial therapy visit (Baseline) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Mean Fundamental Frequency in Sentence at Baseline and at 5 Weeks	Aerodynamic measurement: mean F0 in reading of a standard passage (The Rainbow Passage).	At initial therapy visit (Baseline) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Vocal Intensity at Baseline and Follow up	Acoustic measurement: mean vocal intensity in dB SPL while reading functional phrases.	At initial therapy visit (baseline) and final follow up-visit (week 5)
Secondary	Mean Change In Overall Voice Severity at 5 Weeks	Overall voice severity determined by Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation - Voice (CAPE-V) score provided by blinded raters. The visual analog scale for overall voice severity used. Minimum score = 0, Maximum score = 100. Higher values indicate worse voice.	At initial therapy visit and final follow up-visit, after week 5