Visceral Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Visceral Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
| Verified date | July 2019 |
| Source | Asan Medical Center |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block
on postoperative visceral pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LLC). Given that rectus
sheath block may provide sufficient somatic pain block, investigators aimed to investigate
whether erector spinae block is effective in visceral pain block.
After induction of general anesthesia, group of patient is decided randomly. In Group R,
rectus sheath block is performed with 0.2% Ropivacaine 30ml before the operation. In Group
RE, rectus sheath block and erector spinae plane block are performed with 0.2% ropivacaine
70ml before the operation.
NRS score measurement and comparison of the rescue analgesic dose used at 0, 0.5, 1, 2,6, 12,
18, and 24 hours after arrival at the recovery room were collected
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 60 |
| Est. completion date | June 30, 2019 |
| Est. primary completion date | March 30, 2019 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 20 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. adults between the ages of 20 and 80 2. scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy patient 3. American society of anesthesiologists score 1 or 2 4. Patients who have voluntarily agreed in writing to participate in the trial Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with side effects on local anesthetics or steroids 2. Patient who are taboo of peripheral nerve block such as blood clotting disorder, infection, etc. 3. Patients with uncontrolled medical or psychiatric problem 4. Patient does not agree to participate in the study 5. Patients with deformity at vertebra or chest wall. 6. Patients who are pregnant or lactating 7. Patients receiving a single laparoscopic cholecystectomy (including using a robot) 8. Patients with severe intraperitoneal adhesion (higher than Nair s grade 3), or with external drain. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | Asan Medical Center | Seoul | Songpa-gu |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Asan Medical Center |
Korea, Republic of,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Difference of analgesic consumption between both group | The difference in analgesics usage between the two groups after the operation is checked at fixed intervals (at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 hours after operation) to compare. |
at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 hours after operation | |
| Secondary | compare the Numeric rating scale (NRS) | 10 years old or older. 0: No pain, 1-3: mild pain, 4-6: Moderate pain, 7-10: severe pain, 10: worst pain imaginable. After surgery, the NRS differences between the two groups were compared at a constant interval (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 hours postoperatively). |
at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 9, 18, 24 hours after operation |