View clinical trials related to Venous Thrombosis.
Filter by:This study is designed to investigate the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients receiving a perisurgical regimen of epoetin alfa (PROCRIT®) as compared to patients receiving standard of care blood conservation management.
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term out-of-hospital treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus low-molecular-weight heparin followed by warfarin sodium.
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus the standard care use of intravenous heparin followed by oral warfarin sodium.
It is known that patients who fracture their legs sometimes develop blood clots (known as deep vein thrombosis) in their legs. These clots may cause pain and swelling in the leg or they may detach and travel to the lungs producing shortness of breath, chest pain, and sometimes death. Unfortunately, it is not known how frequently these complications occur after leg fractures, or if the use of a blood thinner medication can effectively and safely prevent these clots. Doctors at hospitals across Canada are conducting a study in which patients who have surgery for leg fractures receive either a once-daily injection of a blood thinner, known as low molecular weight heparin, or a placebo injection for up to 14 days after their fractures. Neither the patients nor the doctors know which patient is on the medication and which patient is on placebo. All patients receive an ultrasound examination of their legs at 2 weeks after surgery to monitor for deep vein thrombosis. In addition, all patients are checked for symptoms of leg or lung clots and any side effects of the medication for 3 months. If the blood thinner is shown to be effective at reducing this complication and documented to be safe and cost-effective in this setting it will be recommended for use in such patients. If, on the other hand, the frequency of deep vein thrombosis is too low to justify the cost or inconvenience of taking this medication, this will also be an important finding.
Comparing nifedipine to placebo for the maintenance tocolysis of preterm labor
FIDO was a multicentred randomized, open-label trial that compared fixed-dose UFH with fixed-dose LMWH for initial treatment of VTE. Patients were followed for 3 months during which they received warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0).
PROTECT Pilot objective is to assess: 1) the feasibility of timely enrollment and complete, blinded study drug administration, 2) the bioaccumulation of LMWH in patients with acquired renal insufficiency and its association with bleeding, 3) the feasibility of scheduled twice weekly lower limb ultrasounds, and 4) recruitment rates for a future randomized trial.
To determine whether d-dimer testing can be used to simplify and reduce the costs of the diagnostic approach to patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
Currently, most emergency physicians have limited access to obtaining formal radiology ultrasound studies, particularly overnight. Many are forced to adopt risky and expensive strategies in managing their patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) who present during off-hours: for low risk patients, discharging without anticoagulation and arranging for outpatient studies; for moderate to high risk patients, empirically anticoagulating and admitting to the hospital to await definitive testing. If emergency physicians could reliably perform an accurate ultrasound exam for DVT, such risks could be obviated. This is a prospective, observational cohort study assessing the accuracy of emergency physician diagnosis of proximal DVT using compact ultrasound equipment and a simplified compression technique. The value of color flow doppler and augmentation will also be assessed. Outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio) will be assessed at 30 days. Prior to enrolling patients in the study, emergency physicians will undertake a 2 hour training course on the performance of the simplified compression technique for the diagnosis of lower extremity DVT. Emergency physicians will perform the DVT ultrasound exam on study subjects with suspected DVT. Clinical management of the study subjects will not be altered; all subjects will proceed to receive a formal DVT ultrasound study by the radiology department which will serve as the criterion reference for the study.