View clinical trials related to Venous Thrombosis.
Filter by:This study is a multicentre, international, randomized controlled trial of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus placebo and, using a partial factorial design, of a perioperative hypotension-avoidance versus hypertension-avoidance strategy.
The Gonda Vascular Center- Thrombophilia Clinic at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota utilizes a standardized, guideline-directed, yet patient-oriented approach for treating patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE).This study is the ongoing registry of clinical practice with standardized approach to patient assessment and therapy. As most of registries it does not have any definite number of recruited subjects or the date of study completion but provides anticipated number of recruited subjects and the time of anticipated enrolment which was provided only because of formal requirement related to structure of ClinicalTrials.gov website. This number will be updated and upgraded as we continue this registry. The rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and survival in patients treated with anticoagulation for acute VTE are assessed during prospective observation. VTE cases include an acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower or upper extremities, splanchnic veins, gonadal, renal, cerebral veins thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE). Therapy includes the whole spectrum of FDA approved anticoagulants such as "classic" agents: warfarin and heparinoids and the newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban.
This is an open label, prospective, non-randomised, multi-centre first-in-human evaluation of the Vetex Thrombectomy Device for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
Initial treatment in the management of acute mesenteric vein thrombosis (MVT) is controversial. Some authors have proposed a surgical approach, whereas others have advocated medical therapy (anticoagulation). In this study, the investigators analyzed and compared the results obtained with surgical and medical treatment to determine the best initial management for this disease.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common post-operative complication. The necessity for anticoagulant therapy after orthopedic surgeries is widely understood, but treatment administration patterns in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopedic surgeries during the hospital stay have yet to be examined. The main objective of this study is to perform a comparative effectiveness review examining the benefits and harms associated with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries. It is around efficacy and safety evaluation of using anticoagulant for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries taking into the account the reliable selection of patients most benefit. The aims of this study is to analyze patient records in teaching hospitals database of our country (including: Hanoi Medical University, Bach Mai Hospital, Cho Ray Hospital, Viet Duc University Hospital) and compare the outcomes and costs between different types of anticoagulant medications that were prescribed for the prevention of VTE following orthopedic surgeries. This analysis will assess and quantify the outcomes, resource utilization, and cost of care for patients receiving rivaroxaban or enoxaparin. The outcomes of interest include the occurence of DVT and PE, rates of major bleeds, medical resource utilization, and total costs (medical plus pharmacy).
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the ability of new D-Dimer assay combined with a clinical pretest probability (PTP) to safely exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) or Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in a 3 month follow-up.
The study is designed as a prospective comparative study. All patients will receive prophylactic anticoagulation according to routine hospital protocol after surgery. A bedside ultrasound examination will be performed by a trained anesthesiologist prior to the surgery and then daily beginning on postoperative day 2 until patient discharge.
The objective of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of the mesoglycan (Prisma®), compared to placebo, in reducing the incidence of thromboembolic complications (relapse / extension of superficial venous thrombosis (SVT), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE)) in patients who have completed the cycle of therapy of the acute phase after superficial vein thrombosis.
The PROGRESS is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomized, trial comparing anticoagulation, which is the currently most frequently used treatment, alone, versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with anticoagulation, in patients presenting with recent obstructive portal vein thrombosis (ROPVT). The rationale of this study is to significantly increase the proportion of patients that achieve a complete or partial recanalization of the portal vein. The intervention of this study consists in TIPS deployment and catheter based clot removal in addition to anticoagulation. The investigators retain that this intervention will increase the proportion of patients with an open portal vein from 38% with anticoagulation alone to 83% with anticoagulation and TIPS after 6 months. Both anticoagulant therapy and clot removal/TIPS are treatments that are currently available and accepted indications for the treatment of ROPVT. Anticoagulation will be performed with unfractioned heparin or low molecular weight heparin initially and with vitamin K antagonists in the long term. The investigators plan to collect blood for biobanking at the time of inclusion and after 6 months. Blood samples for a biobank will be collected.
In this study we are going to measure the blood flow in the lower limbs under cast immobilisation and also under mobilisation with an orthosis. The aim is to evaluate how the aforementioned modalities affect the blood flow and also to compare between the two.