View clinical trials related to Venous Disease.
Filter by:Randomized Controlled Trial to determine if the outcomes of sclerotherapy of the ulcer bed alone differ from a combination of ablation and sclerotherapy injections.
This is a study of biomarkers obtained from prospectively collected subject samples and their correlation with cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The purpose of this initiative is to develop an enduring tool to allow for collaborative research between clinicians at Cleveland Clinic Main Campus and basic scientists at the Lerner Research Institute. This collaboration will allow resources to be available to clinical and basic researchers alike. This tool will enable research of vascular disease in the Vascular Lab and will leverage this valuable asset to the fullest extent to allow for interdepartmental collaboration.
This study is a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter, single-arm, clinical study to evaluate the performance, safety and efficacy of the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent for treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous obstruction.
This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the performance, safety, and efficacy of the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent for treatment of symptomatic inferior vena cava obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral obstruction in adult patients.
Single arm, observational, multi-center, consecutively enrolling, post-market surveillance study. Treating patients in need of central venous access who have upper body venous occlusions or other conditions that preclude central venous access by conventional methods, and who meet the requirements described in the device labeling.
Introduction: Lower extremity Chronic Venous Insufficiency is a prevalent disease that adversely affects an individual's Quality of Life. Varicose vein endovenous radiofrequency treatment have a lower risk of iatrogenic injuries and offer faster return to work activities, when compared with open surgical techniques. Endovenous electrocoagulation can selectively and safely cause Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) wall necrosis but its clinical results has never been studied before. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare Great Saphenous Vein electrocoagulation and radio frequency (RF) endovascular varicose vein treatment clinical results and quality of life improvement in a prospective double blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods: Consecutive patients with varicose veins and primary GSV reflux will be randomized to Electrocoagulation or Radiofrequency endovenous treatment. The primary outcome measure will be GSV occlusion rate at 3 and 6 months after treatment verified by Duplex Scanning (DS). Secondary outcome measures will be pain visual analogue scale (VAS), bruising, neuropathy and vein thrombosis frequency in the immediate postoperative period (1 week); and Clinical Etiology Anatomy and Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification ,Venous Clinical Severity Scale (VCSS), and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), obtained preoperatively, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. For statistical analysis, we will use the Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney test and Pearson's correlation, considering positive statistical significance when level of p <0.05.