Clinical Trials Logo

Vascular Surgical Procedures clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Vascular Surgical Procedures.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05779852 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Vascular Surgical Procedures

Pain Management of Amputation Wounds With AutoHypnosis

MODOUPAAH
Start date: June 29, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Amputation in vascular surgery mainly concerns the lower limb and is often linked to Obliterative Arterial Disease of the Lower Limbs. It indicates the impossibility or failure of revascularisation after an exhaustive assessment aimed at saving the limb. It is also performed to limit the spread of gangrene, an affection of the limb that can evolve into septicaemia. The principle is to amputate in a healthy and vascularised area to allow good healing of the amputation stump. Amputations of one, several or all toes, called complete transmetatarsal amputations, may take several months to heal. Amputations require directed healing and, above all, monitoring of the underlying tissues of the amputated area by daily detersions and wiping performed by a nurse at home. The mechanical detersion of the wound necessary for the healing process and cell migration, as well as optimal deep meshing, facilitate the evolution of the healing process. These treatments often cause pain, despite oral analgesics and local anaesthetics prior to the treatment. For several years, studies have shown the benefits of hypnosis in modifying the perception of pain, particularly during treatment. Studies have also shown that self-hypnosis allows a reduction in the intensity of pain. The clinical experience of the vascular surgery department of the University Hospital of Rennes suggests that patients who use self-hypnosis during the daily dressing of their amputation experience the moment more serenely, increasing their comfort and decreasing their pain and anxiety.

NCT ID: NCT05766579 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Vascular Surgical Procedures

Comparison Trial Between Elastic-compressive Stockings at 21 Versus 32 mmHg

CALESSE
Start date: April 2, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Endovascular thermal ablation is currently considered as the best procedure for treating varicose veins thanks to its mini-invasiveness and the lowest rate of incidence of complications. At the end of the endovascular ablation procedure, the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines recommend the use of the compression stockings to reduce postoperative pain and the incidence of edema and thrombotic complications. Despite this, the duration, type and degree of compression to be used, particularly after radiofrequency ablation procedures, remain a matter of debate. Furthermore, although the benefits of postoperative elastic compression therapy are well known, there is various evidence demonstrating how patients often experience poor comfort in wearing stockings, especially those with a higher degree of compression, which causes poor compliance with therapy. In light of all this, each center recommends the use of elastic compression stockings in the postoperative period with a degree of compression that varies, however, according to internal protocols. There is currently no work in the literature that compares the advantages and disadvantages of using elastic compression stockings with a K2 versus K1 compression degree after radiofrequency ablative surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04333693 Not yet recruiting - COVID-19 Clinical Trials

Outcomes of Vascular Surgery in COVID-19 Infection: National Cohort Study

Covid-VAS
Start date: April 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

There is an urgent need to understand the outcomes of COVID-19 infected patients who undergo surgery, specially vascular surgery. Capturing real-world data and sharing Spanish national experience will inform the management of this complex group of patients who undergo surgery throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, improving their clinical care. The global community has recognised that rapid dissemination and completion of studies in COVID-19 infected patients is a high priority, so we encourage all stakeholders (local investigators, ethics committees, IRBs) to work as quickly as possible to approve this project. This investigator-led, non-commercial, non-interventional study is extremely low risk, or even zero risk. This study does not collect any patient identifiable information (including no dates) and data will not be analysed at hospital-level.

NCT ID: NCT01584193 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Vascular Surgical Procedures

Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Venous Access Port Implantation

Start date: June 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare two different surgical techniques for implementation of totally implantable central venous access ports. Ultrasound-guided suclavian vein puncture is compared to cephalic vein dissection.