Varicose Veins Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency Thermo-ablation Treatments of Great Saphenous Varicose Veins: Venefit (Closurefast) vs. Radiofrequency Induced Thermal Therapy (RFITT) vs. Endovenous Radiofrequency (EVRF).
A double blind randomised controlled trial of radiofrequency thermal ablation treatments of
great saphenous varicose veins: Venefit (Closurefast), vs. Radiofrequency induced Thermal
Therapy vs. Endovenous Radiofrequency.
Assessments by visual pain scores, duplex ablation and quality of life questionaires
Purpose To establish which of the radiofrequency venous ablation modalities is most effective
in preventing reflux in the treated segment of GSV six months following surgery.
Design Results of randomised trials and meta-analyses have shown that endovenous thermal
ablation using radiofrequency ablation and laser are associated with improved recovery
compared with conventional surgery on the GSV. Further, radiofrequency (Closurefast) has been
showed to cause less pain and require less analgesic intake than laser. There are two other
radiofrequency devices that have theoretical advantages over the Closurefast technique. All
three procedures have been used in clinical practice (including at Worcestershire Royal
Hospital). There has been no trial to date which has directly compared the outcomes of the
three radiofrequency thermal ablation devices.
Recruitment Patients will be recruited from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust vascular
surgical out-patient clinics. All patients will receive a duplex scan (Toshiba Viamo
Ultrasound, Tokyo, Japan or Sonosite M-Turbo Bothell, Washington, USA) prior to entry into
the trial to confirm their suitability for endovenous thermal ablation treatment. During this
assessment patients will also have their CEAP (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and
Pathophysiological) classification of severity and aetiology of venous disease score
recorded. If the patient consents to the trial they will be asked to fill in the disease
specific Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)and generic quality of life SF-36 and
Euroquol (EQ-5D) questionnaires and have their Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)
calculated.
Patients will be recruited to the trial following an appropriate explanation of the study
(see patient information / consent sheet). Randomisation will be performed by a random number
generator (www.random.org).
Patients will be randomised to radiofrequency ablation either by Closurefast (Venefit, VNUS
Medical Technologies, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), the Radiofrequency induced Thermal Therapy
(RFiTT, Olympus Surgical Technologies Europe, Hamburg, Germany) or EndoVenous Radiofrequency
(EVRF, Medical Innovations, Bolton, United Kingdom). All treatments are already in use in
Worcestershire.
Operation All treatments will be performed under local tumescent anaesthesia. Patients will
receive thromboprophylaxis when indicated in line with the Hospital Trust's local
thromboprophylaxis protocol. Procedures will be performed under duplex control (Sonosite
M-Turbo, Bothell, Washington, USA) by an experienced vascular surgery Specialist Registrar or
Consultant. The GSV will be catheterised percutaneously using a Seldinger technique at the
level of the lowest point of reflux. The radiofrequency treatment catheter will be passed
endoluminally to the level of the sapheno-femoral junction. Tumescent anaesthesia (50mg
Prilocaine, 10mls 8.4% sodium bicarbonate in 1000mls 0.9% saline) will be injected in the
peri-venous space in all patients (200 - 500ml). The position of the radiofrequency catheter
will be confirmed just below the level of the sapheno-femoral junction prior to commencing
the radiofrequency current and withdrawing the catheter to treat the vein in line with local
practice. The Closurefast is withdrawn after a double treatment of the most proximal segment
of the long saphenous vein and then segmentally thereafter, the RFiTT will be withdrawn
continuously with retreatments, and the EVRF will be withdrawn in small stepwise movements
(all as per the manufacturer's instructions for use). The volume of anaesthetic administered,
length of vein treated and duration of the ablation will be recorded.
In line with current NICE guidance (CG168), where necessary, patients will undergo avulsions
of local varicosities at the same time. The number of avulsions will be recorded in both
groups. Perforating veins will not be directly treated. Treated legs will be dressed with
dressing pads a full length bandage (coban, 3M United Kingdom plc, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK)
and compression hosiery. Patients will be discharged on the day of surgery (day-case) with
oral analgesia as required and will be given contact information should any adverse events
arise.
Post-operative follow-up
i) First week Patients will be asked to keep a pain score for the first post-operative week.
This is a simple 10cm visual analogue score. All patients will be invited back to clinic at
two weeks for a duplex scan (blind assessment). During this visit the vascular team will
assess any complications in the area of ablation including bruising (digital photographic
record), wound infection, neuralgia, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus.
ii) Six months The primary endpoint of the study is an ablated GSV. Treatment failure will be
defined as any segment of the treated trunk (> 2cm from the saphenofemoral junction) that is
patent (compressible) and demonstrates reflux (>1 second) on duplex scanning.
A number of secondary outcome measures will be evaluated in the study:
Pain score/ analgesic requirements
Time to return to normal activity
Absence or recurrent varicose veins/return of symptoms
Quality Of Life (QoL): Disease specific (AVVQ) and generic (EQ5D & SF36) quality of life
assessments will be compared at 1 weeks post treatment, 6 months and 12 months. The 1-week
questionnaire will be given to the patient at discharge, whereas other QoL questionnaires
will be sent to the patient. AVVQ is the most widely utilised disease specific QoL tool in
venous disease and has been extensively validated. A score out of 100 points is calculated,
with a higher score indicating more severe QoL impairment.
Other Markers Of Clinical Success: The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) will be assessed
at 6 months. In addition, the incidence of complications related to the endovenous
intervention as well as the presence of residual / recurrent varicose veins will also be
assessed at 2 weeks.
Medium and longer-term endpoints (follow-up) will be performed at 2 years and 5 years.
However, this is likely to be limited by the high rates (>20%) of drop-out reported in other
studies.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03283800 -
Copper Impact on Venous Insufficiency and Lipodermatosclerosis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02676908 -
Optimum Duration of Compression Stockings After Endovenous Varicose Vein Surgery
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01203397 -
Safety And Efficacy Study Of Topic Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate In The Superficial Varicose Veins Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01426035 -
Safety And Efficacy Study Of Topic Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Cream In The Superficial Varicose Veins Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02054325 -
Study Protocol Comparing Polidocanol Versus Hypertonic Glucose for Treatment of Reticular Veins
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03601572 -
Hypnoanalgesia in Surgical and Endovenous Treatment of Varicosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT04933591 -
Impact of Treatment With VENARUS® on the Level of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 in Varicose Veins Blood
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02397226 -
Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency and the Effect of Radiofrequency Treatment Versus Open Surgery
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02936271 -
Efficacy of Vasculera in Prevention on Post-op Pain and Edema Following Lower Extremity Venous Treatment in the Outpatient Setting
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02557542 -
Pilot RCT Evaluating a One Stop Vein Clinic
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00758420 -
Randomized, Single Blind, Placebo Controlled, to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Polidocanol Injectable Foam for Treatment of Symptomatic, Visible Varicose Veins With SFJ Incompetence
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00841178 -
Endovenous Laser Therapy (EVLT) for Sapheno-Popliteal Incompetence and Short Saphenous Vein (SSV) Reflux: A RCT
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05508581 -
Microwaves Ablation of Varicose Veins
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05247333 -
Implementation of a Minor Ailment Service in Community Pharmacy Practice
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04339075 -
Registry to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of VenaBlock VeIn SEaling System for VaRicose Veins in SingApore
|
||
Completed |
NCT03392753 -
Mechanochemical Ablation Compared to Cyanoacrylate Adhesive
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04146168 -
Lake Washington Vascular VenaSealâ„¢ Post-Market Evaluation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02304146 -
Long-term Ultrasound Guided Foam Sclerotherapy Versus Classical Surgical Stripping Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01200199 -
Validity of Electronic Diary for Monitoring Varicose Veins Symptoms
|
||
Completed |
NCT01231373 -
Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Saphenofemoral Junction (SFJ) Incompetence
|
Phase 3 |