Variceal Bleeding Clinical Trial
Official title:
Appropriate Time Interval for Repeat Sessions of Endoscopic Ligation for the Eradication of Esophageal Varices
Patients with liver disease frequently present to the hospital with bleeding from dilated veins in their foodpipe (called esophageal varices). The current standard of care is to perform endoscopic variceal ligation (placing rubber bands around the varices through an endoscope)in patients presenting with bleeding varices. Patients generally receive ligation at the time they come in with bleeding and then return at regular intervals to have repeat ligation in order to eradicate the varices. However there have been no studies to determine the appropriate intervals for esophageal variceal ligation until eradication. We will conduct a randomized comparison of 1-week vs. 2-week intervals for esophageal ligation in patients that have presented with bleeding varices. Our hypothesis is that one-week ligation will achieve more rapid eradication than the two-week interval with a greater proportion of patients achieving variceal eradication at 4 weeks after the index bleeding episode.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | December 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients who presented with acute upper GI bleeding due to esophageal varices and underwent successful endoscopic variceal ligation. - Patients who would normally receive repeat endoscopic ligation therapy to eradicate varices. Exclusion Criteria: - Persistent bleeding despite endoscopic and medical therapy - Platelet count < 40,000 |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | L.A. County + U.S.C. Medical Center | Los Angeles | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Southern California | VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Yale University |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Proportion of patients with eradication of esophageal varices | At 4 weeks | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT00965900 -
Endoscopic Band Ligation (EBL) Versus Propranolol for Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05629845 -
Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding by EUS-guided vs Conventional Endoscopic Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00570973 -
Band Ligation Versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Stent Shunt (TIPS) in Cirrhotics With Recurrent Variceal Bleeding Non Responding to Medical Therapy
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00562445 -
Adrenal Insufficiency in Critical Emergencies in Digestive Diseases
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01383044 -
Banding Ligation With Carvedilol Versus Carvedilol for the Prevention of First Bleeding
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01060267 -
Intravenous Erythromycin Before Endoscopy in Patients With Variceal Bleeding: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00921349 -
A Trial of Ligation Plus Nadolol Versus Nadolol Alone in the Prophylaxis of First Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00966121 -
Endoscopic Band Ligation (EBL) Versus Endoscopic Band Ligation and Propranolol for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00966082 -
EBL Versus EBL and Propranolol for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding in Pts With Previous Variceal Treatment
|
Phase 4 |