View clinical trials related to UTI.
Filter by:This study is designed to provide an evaluation of currently available disposable flexible ureteroscopes in real-world conditions. Due to high re-processing costs associated with re-usable flexible ureteroscopes, there has been a demand for Urologic device manufacturers to provide single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
Urinary tract infection (UTI) in a child may be the first symptom of congenital anomaly of the kidneys and the urinary tract (CAKUT). Thus, imaging diagnostics are warranted in children with first episode of UTI. Abdominal ultrasonography (USG) is the first line imaging modality in evaluating children with UTI. Abnormalities suggesting CAKUT found on USG are an indication for further, more invasive tests. The timing of USG in UTI depends on the clinical situation. It always should be performed urgently when serious acute complications of UTI are suspected. However, appropriate timing of USG in children responding well to therapy, is a matter of debate. According to animal studies, E. coli produces toxin which dilates the urinary tract. This may result in misleading picture on USG in acute phase of infection. Guidelines on UTI management in children differ in respect to recommended USG timing. The purpose of the study is to investigate how UTI does affect USG results in children and when its effect subsides. Methods 150 children up to 3 years of age, with the first episode of UTI, will be included in our study. Three USG examinations will be performed by single radiologist in every child: 1. in the first day of treatment, 2. two weeks after treatment initiation, 3. four weeks after treatment initiation. Age, gender, etiologic factor, C-reactive protein concentration and white blood cells count will be included in statistical analysis. The study is aimed to help clinicians interpret USG findings during UTI and make reasonable plans for further imaging diagnostics in children with UTI.
Due to the damage caused to the spinal cord, patients with spinal cord injury, cauda equina syndrome, multiple sclerosis and transverse myelitis may encounter loss of bladder function, which in turn can lead to a debilitating and costly complication: Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs). Given that these patients with loss of bladder function do not normally feel symptoms like pain - as would be the case in otherwise healthy persons - there is no clear agreement among experts on which signs and symptoms are indicative of a UTI. Although strong evidence is lacking, antibiotics have been widely used for prevention of recurrent UTIs in patients with loss of bladder function. However, this approach is now being questioned as antibiotic resistance has become a world-wide health concern. Policy makers recently stressed the importance of research into alternative preventative treatments. The use of immunotherapy is one such an alternative approach, which works by stimulating the body's immune system. One of these immunotherapy is a Uro-Vaxom® oral capsule which consists of inactivated traces of the bacteria that normally cause at least 83% of UTIs in patients with loss of bladder function. Previous studies show that Uro-Vaxom® resulted in a significant reduction of UTIs in otherwise healthy patients, as well as being safe to use. Before investigating the effects of this promising new immunotherapy, this proposed study aims to clarify two crucial issues. First, after reviewing the literature and appraising patients', carers' and healthcare professionals' experiences, the aim is to reach an agreement on how to measure a symptomatic UTI in patients with loss of bladder function that results from a spinal cord lesion. Second, using Uro-Vaxom® Investigators aim to conduct a smallscale, placebo-controlled trial with 48 participants to investigate the feasibility of carrying out a larger trial on prevention of symptomatic UTI in such patients.
This is an observational prospective study of an in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay planned to enroll 632 subjects. The study will be conducted in two stages: Stage A is aimed at identifying individual biomarkers and constructing a multi-parametric diagnostic model, whereas Stage B is aimed at testing the multi-parametric diagnostic model using a fresh cohort of patients. A collection of clinical, radiological and laboratory data will be gathered in order to establish a final diagnosis. Blood samples will be analyzed and the levels of approximately 700 and 250,000 biomarkers will be determined using immunoassays and molecular measurements respectively. A final diagnosis will be determined based on a majority decision of a panel of three or more independent physicians. Based on the final diagnosis, the accuracy of individual biomarkers and combined sets of biomarkers for differentiating between distinct groups of patients will be evaluated.