View clinical trials related to Urothelial Carcinoma.
Filter by:The goal of this study is to conduct the first randomized-controlled trial to determine the oncologic efficacy of lymph node dissection in participants with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To determine oncologic outcomes, specifically 2-year recurrence-free survival - To determine other oncologic outcomes including treatment-free, cancer-specific and overall survival - To determine time to recurrence and recurrence patterns - To determine use of adjuvant therapies - To determine perioperative complications Participants will undergo nephroureterectomy with or without lymph node dissection. Researchers will compare these two groups to determine the oncologic efficacy of performing lymph node dissection.
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic germline variants in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. New cancer screening and diagnostic tools are urgently needed to identify LS-related cancers early enough for curative treatment. Urothelial cancers (comprising bladder and upper tract urothelial tumors) are the third most common cancer after colorectal and endometrial cancers in individuals with LS. Up to one in four LS individuals will develop urothelial cancer during their lifetime, with the risk varying based on the defective MMR gene. In this clinical trial, we will employ urine tumor DNA (utDNA) to identify asymptomatic urothelial cancers in Lynch syndrome patients, and to investigate the potential benefits of urine tumor DNA based screening in this high-risk population.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RC48-ADC combined with AK104 in HER2-expression locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
This is a global, open-label, multicenter Phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and antitumor activity of PRO1107 in patients with advanced solid tumors. This study consists of 2 parts, Part A: dose escalation and dose level expansion, and Part B: tumor specific expansion.
The goal of this study is to better understand how to best treat participants with advanced bladder cancer who may not be able to tolerate all of the chemotherapy drugs that have been shown to be effective. In this study, investigators are assessing the role of the survey, the Geriatric-8, and its ability to predict outcomes in older participants undergoing cancer treatments. Additionally, investigators are evaluating the differential impact of treatments on quality of life in an older and at risk population.
The clinical feasibility of 18F-LN1 PET/CT will be evaluated in 30 patients with urothelial carcinoma, and the results will be compared with those of 18F-FDG.
This study is an ambispective cohort observational study to analyze the efficacy of surgery alone versus postoperative adjuvant therapy (postoperative radiotherapy/postoperative chemotherapy(immunotherapy)/ combined strategy) in patients with the upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma with high-risk factors (postoperative pathology suggestive of pT2 and above, N+, G3/high-grade and multiple tumors, positive cut margins). A subgroup analysis was performed to obtain the population of patients who might benefit from different treatment approaches. Patients with high risk factors for postoperative recurrence or metastasis will be treated with relevant adjuvant therapy, which in turn will benefit patients.
The project aims to characterize the prognostic role of CTCs in Bladder cancer patients, with the specific aims to better stratify patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer at the first transurethral resection of tumor and to identify urothelial biomarker expressed by CTCs.
This is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized trial designed to evaluate the RFS of TURBT followed by cretostimogene grenadenorepvec versus TURBT followed by observation for the treatment of participants with IR-NMIBC.
This is a phase 2 pragmatic study that evaluates the clinical benefit of continuing systemic therapy with the addition of locally ablative therapies for oligo-progressive solid tumors as the primary objective. The primary outcome measure is the time to treatment failure (defined as time to change in systemic failure or permanent discontinuation of therapy) following locally ablative therapy.