View clinical trials related to Urinary Tract Infections.
Filter by:The Uroshield device is a commercially available device with two parts: a disposable actuator which attaches to the external portion of the catheter and a portable battery. The device sends out low-frequency ultrasound waves which run along the surfaces of the catheter. These acoustic waves prevent bacteria from adhering to the catheter and prevent the formation of biofilm. Our objective is to conduct a pilot study to determine if the UroShield device can reduce bacteriuria and catheter biofilm formation among neurogenic bladder patients with an indwelling catheter, as well as improve urinary quality of life and symptoms.
This is a Phase 4, multi-center, open-label, randomized pragmatic superiority clinical trial comparing two strategies for initial or step-down oral therapy for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) after 0-48 hours of parenteral antibiotic therapy. The trial will evaluate the success and safety of a strategy of initial or step-down fosfomycin, administered at a dose of 3 g once daily, vs. a strategy of initial or step-down levofloxacin administered at a dose of 750 mg once daily. Investigator-directed adjustment to another adequate oral therapy is allowed 1) if the causative pathogen is not susceptible in vitro to quinolone initial or step-down therapy in a subject randomized to the levofloxacin strategy, OR 2) if the subject develops an intolerance or allergy to the initial step-down oral therapy and at the investigator's discretion, OR 3) the subject has an underlying condition posing increasing risk for adverse events from quinolone therapy. The duration of oral therapy (initial + investigator-directed adjustment if indicated) in each strategy is 5-7 days of any per protocol antibiotic to which the pathogen is susceptible. The dosing of oral therapy depends on creatinine clearance (CrCl). The trial will enroll approximately 634 patients that are either male or female aged 18 or older with cUTI from outpatient and inpatient settings. The study will take place over 25 months in up to 15 US sites. The primary objective is to compare Strategy 1 and Strategy 2 in terms of treatment success rates at Test of Cure (TOC).
Injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) into the bladder is a widely used treatment option for patients with overactive bladder who have failed medical therapy. Urinary tract infection is the most common side effect of this procedure and therefore antibiotics are given around the time of injection in order to prevent these events. While antibiotics are commonly given at the time of injection, the duration of these antibiotic regimens are variable. The investigators propose a study to investigate different antibiotic protocols and their affect on the rate of urinary tract infection after injection.
In this trial, women with history of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) will be followed over the course of 6 months. The women will be randomized either to D- Mannose or Placebo. The primary objective of this study is to investigate if treatment with D-mannose reduces the risk for a UTI recurrence compared to treatment with Placebo. H0: Women with history of recurrent UTIs treated with D-Mannose on average have the same number of recurrent UTIs over the course of 6 months compared to women treated with Placebo. H1: Women with history of recurrent UTIs treated with D-Mannose on average have fewer recurrent UTIs over the course of 6 months compared to women treated with Placebo.
Over the last decade, there has been great emphasis on reducing the incidence of hospital-acquired infections, including catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI). This study will evaluate the effectiveness of Betadine irrigation solution (2% povidone-iodine) instilled into the bladder immediately prior to indwelling catheter removal to decrease the risk of subsequent bacteriuria, leading to decreased rates of NHSN defined CAUTI.
This is a study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a nutraceutical as a non-antibiotic treatment to prevent recurrent urinary tract infections in women that have completed menopause and are on vaginal estrogen therapy. An additional group of women with recurrent urinary tract infections that have completed menopause but are not using vaginal estrogen therapy will be followed while taking the nutraceutical. The study length is ninety days from the date that the study participant will be instructed is day 1.
Infections requiring intravenous antimicrobial therapy are very common events in patients with advanced cancer. Nevertheless, these patients frequently present vascular damages becoming extremely difficult to access and maintain intravenous route for hydration and nutritional support. In this context, the subcutaneous route could be implemented as an alternative route for replacement of fluids, electrolytes and drugs. Few studies have evaluated the possibility of using the subcutaneous route for treatment of infections though. Patients in palliative care often have infections caused by multidrug resistant bacterial such as beta-lactamase producing bacteria. In this context, we hypothesize Ertapenem subcutaneously is not inferior to the same drug intravenously for the treatment of urinary infections in patients on oncologic palliative care. A non-inferiority clinical trial would be adequate and could provide stronger evidence on the possibility of this alternative route for antibiotic therapy in urinary tract infections, with important advantages such as greater convenience of use.
The impact of treatment for GSM on the quality of life will be examined for postmenopausal women (defined as last menstrual period > 1 year ago or 6 months ago with FSH >40) who have been diagnosed with breast cancer.
This is a 2-week, single-site, randomized study in adults requiring short-term (≤ 14 days) catheterization. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either the biofilm disrupting gel (BLASTX) or SOC (McKesson Jelly) lubricated catheters. Urine and/or catheter DNA analysis will be obtained at catheter insertion, 2, 5, 7 and 14 days after catheterization.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common cause of bacteremia and serious bacterial infections in young children (2-24 months of age). Because these children are usually unable to say what symptoms they are experiencing, UTIs are diagnosed through testing. Current testing of urine samples require a catheter or suprapubic aspiration performed for urine collection for infections markers to be reliable. Bag specimens often have varying results that can be poor in sensitivity and specificity depending on what component of the urine test one is looking at. Catheter and aspiration testing can be anxiety-provoking to parents, be painful for patients and even introduce bacteria into the bladder. An antimicrobial peptide called alpha human defensin-5 (HD5) is produced by the uroepithelium in response to infection. HD5 has been studied in the urine and does increase in actual UTIs. This study will look at children 1 to 24 months of age and again study levels of HD5 in culture positive UTIs versus urine negative for UTI. This study will also determine if collection method alters HD5 levels. We will measure HD5 levels in the urine from a bag specimen and a catheter specimen in the same patient. Our primary objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of HD5 measured in urine collected by bag and catheter in the same patient for the diagnosis of UTI in children between the age 1 to 24 months presenting with febrile illness and suspected UTI.