View clinical trials related to Urinary Incontinence.
Filter by:The goal of this observational study is detecting the dominant component of mixed urinary incontinence via a combined version of ICIQ-SF and quality of life scale. The main question it aims to answer is: 1. Which component (urgency or stress) urinary incontinence bothers the patient more?
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the short-term improvement in urinary incontinence after perineo-sphincter rehabilitation using functional electrostimulation and biofeedback (PHENIX LIBERTY VIVALTIS device) in patients with pelvic statics disorders. • Does the use of the medical device in the treatment of pelvic static disorders lead to an improvement in urinary incontinence? Participants will use the medical device, which provides electrical stimulation, biofeedback and pressure biofeedback to re-educate the pelvic floor muscles and improve urinary incontinence.
The goal of this clinical study is to compare the effects of combined electroacupuncture with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) versus PFMT alone in the treatment of involuntary urine leakage following prostate removal procedure due to prostate cancer. The main question it aims to answer is that whether adding electroacupuncture to PFMT provides extra benefits in relieve urinary leakage and improves patients' quality of life. All participants will be required to perform daily PFMT for 6 weeks using uniformed standards. During the meantime, those assigned to the experimental group will additionally receive electroacupuncture three times per week for 6 weeks, while those in control group will receive sham treatment with same duration. Researchers will compare the urine leakage severity between the two groups to see if adding electroacupuncture can facilitate the recovery of symptom.
The main goal of this study is to see if group pelvic floor training before surgery can help prevent urinary incontinence after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) surgery. The study has the potential to inform preoperative intervention strategies for managing incontinence after HoLEP.
To investigate the efficacy of combined laser and HITS treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI)
The research will be done with people with urinary incontinence and low back pain. 3 groups of volunteer participants will be formed. The groups were planned as study group, classical application group and control group. Classical pelvic floor muscle training will be applied to the classical application group. Pelvic floor muscle training combined with stabilization exercises will be applied to the study group. In this study, the effect of pelvic floor muscle training combined with stabilization exercises on pain and urinary parameters compared to classical pelvic floor muscle training will be investigated in people with urinary incontinence and low back pain at the same time.
Urodynamic studies are objective diagnostic methods recommended and used in the evaluation and diagnosis of urinary incontinence, which is a very common problem that can significantly affect women's health and quality of life, cause social and economic losses. With these examinations, objective observation of bladder functions, repetition and classification of patients' symptoms, and identification of the underlying pathological cause, if possible, are provided in the evaluation of lower urinary system dysfunctions; In this way, the diagnosis is made, the choice of treatment is affected, the results of the treatment can be predicted and appropriate counseling can be given to the patients. Although conventional urodynamics is currently accepted as the gold standard test in the investigation of lower urinary tract symptoms, non-physiological retrograde bladder filling may adversely affect the test results and patients have to be under observation on the examination table while being examined with the conventional urodynamic method. Conventional method may not be effective enough in revealing the etiopathogenesis of lower urinary system symptoms, because they cannot perform activities where lower urinary system symptoms occur. Although many studies have shown that the diagnostic value of ambulatory urodynamics (AU) is higher in urogynecology clinical practice, it was not found suitable for routine investigation due to its longer duration, time-consuming and cost-effectiveness. For this reason, its routine use has been limited in international guidelines for AU in cases where conventional urodynamics is insufficient in the diagnosis, by indicating its application. In the AU method, all physiopathological changes in the lower urinary system can be observed synchronously, since the bladder filling is orthograde, not retrograde, that is, the lower urinary system is examined while the physiological urine is filled, not liquid, and the patients can perform the activities they want, and the symptoms that occur during these activities can be recorded by the patient. Despite the advantages of performing it under these conditions, it takes a long time to be evaluated with 2-4 voiding cycles and is used as a second step in cases that cannot be diagnosed by conventional urodynamics. In the previous studies performed by us, it was seen that the results of the ambulatory urodynamic examination performed with a single voiding cycle were similar to the studies in the literature using multiple voiding cycles. However, at the moment, there is no study in the literature that determines the optimal duration of this test. For these reasons, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the test at the end of a single voiding cycle with that at the end of multiple (2 to 4) voiding cycles.
Urinary incontinence (UI) is estimated to affect 25% à 45 % women all over the world. UI is associated with a poor Quality of life, with a strong level of certainty. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the second more prevalent type of UI . First-line treatment for SUI is conservative, non-drug and non-surgical treatment. Among these techniques, physiotherapist-supervised pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training (PFMT) as a first-line treatment; however, only half of women with SUI are cured with PFMT. Brain imaging shows that PFMs (involved in continence mechanisms) and gluteal muscles can activate the same cortical region. This synergy is found if the gluteal muscles are voluntarily activated, but not if the PFMs are volontary activated alone . In women, hip abductor physiotherapy is a common practice which has already been the subject of a very extensive literature and has largely shown its effectiveness in the quality of lumbo-pelvic control, balance, quality of life and risk of fall prevention. This rehabilitation is based on exercises that induce solicitation of the hip abductors by synergistic reflex activation during a range of well-known exercises. Recent work has shown the effect of hip abductors on the activation of the PFMs . Until today, there is no literature evaluating the effectiveness of a hip abductors training program without associated voluntary contraction of the PFMs (PPM) on UI. The hypothesis of this work will be to demonstrate that a complementary training focused on the hip abductor, complementary to concomitant PFMT, would benefit from a more significant improvement in continence, and also in physical abilities and quality of life. Because balance seems involved in UI, we therefore propose to to observe the effects on the frontal balance of the pelvis. As the investigators have already done in previous studies, to identifying factors that predict the success of our interventions, investiagtors have planned to evaluate the observance and adherence of our patients .Complementary, the investigators planned to evaluate the effect of both intervention on pelvic floor muscles and hip abductors strength and endurance, pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and quality of life. For this objective, the investigators intend to compare two randomized parallel groups: Group A follow a 12 sessions supervised PFMT + home based PFMs exercices. Group B follow a 12 sessions supervised PFMT + home based hip abductor exercices.
Aims: (1) Investigate the efficacy of PelviSense-assisted PFMT compared with PFMT alone for improving SUI symptom severity in women; (2) Compare the cost-effectiveness of the PelviSense device against PFMT alone for treating SUI in women; (3) Explore the views of women regarding the use of the PelviSense device as an adjunct to PFMT and the impacts of the PelviSense device on their lives and well-being. Design and subjects: A sequential, embedded, experimental mixed-methods design, including a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and semi-structured focus groups, will be conducted alongside an economic evaluation. The proposed study will include 142 women with SUI or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence. Interventions: Women will be randomly allocated to one of two groups (PelviSense or PFMT alone [control]). The PelviSense group will perform PFMT with assistance from the PelviSense device, and the control group will perform PFMT without biofeedback (i.e., PFMT alone). Outcome measures: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, one-hour pad test, Modified Oxford Scale, EQ-5D-5L, and electronic cost diary. Data analysis and expected results: Statistical analysis will be conducted using analysis of covariance. The PelviSense group is expected to report significant improvements in primary and secondary outcomes compared with the PFMT alone group. The PelviSense group will yield cost savings and result in lower health care utility compared with the PFMT alone group.
The study is seeking to understand the needs of patients and healthcare practitioners for an innovation in the way that changes in bladder function are assessed. This information will be used in the design and evaluation of a device, being developed in parallel, that assesses changes to the volume and flow of urine in order to determine changes in bladder function. In order to ensure development is optimal, the principal research objective is therefore to understand the needs of patients and healthcare practitioners (ranging from care home staff and GPs in primary care, to urologists in tertiary referral centres).