View clinical trials related to Urinary Incontinence, Stress.
Filter by:There is a high prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) among female athletes participating in high impact sports, such as artistic gymnastics, trampoline jumping and ball games. UI is defined as "the complaint of involuntary loss of urine". Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common type of UI and is defined as "the complaint of involuntary loss of urine on effort or physical exertion (e.g. sporting activities), or or sneezing or coughing". Urinary leakage during sport activities may affect the athletes' performance, cause bother, frustration and embarrassment and furthermore lead to avoidance and cessation of sport activities. Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training is highly effective in treating SUI in the general female population. However, evidence of the effect of PFM training in elite athletes in high impact sports is sparse. The purpose of this assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the effect of PFM training on symptoms, bother and amount of SUI in female artistic gymnasts, team gymnasts and cheerleaders.
Evaluation of a new technology for the treatment of bladder leakage in women. The objective is to compare quality of life and other incontinence associated outcomes between women receiving routine General Practitioner (GP) prescribed care for urinary incontinence compared with those prescribed the electrical stimulation device.
Single-blind, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of the Vesair Balloon in the treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in post-menopausal women
This study is designed to determine primarily if there is a difference in perceived pain in patients receiving urethral bulking with calcium hydroxylapatite using local lidocaine versus local lidocaine plus nitrous oxide gas. Patients will be randomized to a control group (local lidocaine plus room air) or a intervention group (local lidocaine plus 50% nitrous oxide/50% oxygen inhaled mixture). Their pain will be assessed immediately after the procedure, and their recollection of pain will also be assessed at their 2 week post-procedure visit. There are other secondary outcome measures as well; please see outcome measures section for full description.
Multicenter, prospective, single-arm study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Vesair Bladder Control treatment in post-menopausal women with Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) with follow-up at 1, 3 and 12 months. All subjects will be prospectively treated after the subject has provided informed consent and determination that all study entry criteria have been met.
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a highly prevalent condition of involuntary urine leakage associated with coughing, sneezing or exertion. Midurethral slings (MUS) are a safe and efficacious surgical option to treat SUI and is considered the best treatment by recognized organizations. Nevertheless, it remains a surgical intervention exposing patients to risks, possible recurrence and is not recommended to women planning to have more children. Incontinence pessaries offer an alternative to surgery with a similar mechanism of action as MUS. However, there is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of incontinence pessary treatment of SUI, with only two prospective studies have been published on the Uresta pessary and one australian case-series on Contiform pessary. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the self-positioning Contiform intravaginal pessary used as a conservative method to address stress urinary incontinence in women in order to provide Canadian real-world data. The 3-month efficacy, adverse events and global patient satisfaction (including comfort and ease of insertion) will be assessed. It is hypothesized that the Contiform device will be well tolerated by 60-70% of patients, with no serious adverse events. It will cure SUI for about 50% of them.
The purpose of this research is to compare two different approaches for treating patients with stress urinary incontinence: neuromuscular re-education, impairment-based exercise and electric dry needling versus neuromuscular re-education and impairment-based exercise. Physical therapists commonly use all of these techniques to treat stress urinary incontinence. This study is attempting to find out if one treatment strategy is more effective than the other.
The investigators propose a randomized non-blinded comparison of standard vs. transcorporal approach for placement of an artificial urinary sphincter in male patients with stress urinary incontinence after radiation and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. In the United States, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), manufactured by American Medical Systems, is the gold standard surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men. The cuff, which is the portion of the device that encircles and occludes the urethra, is typically placed directly around the urethra (i.e., "standard" placement). The cuff can erode into the urethra. Transcorporal placement has been introduced as a method to reduce the risk of erosion. Transcorporal placement involves tunneling the cuff through the erectile bodies so as to protect the dorsal aspect of the urethra. This approach has never been compared to standard placement in a randomized fashion. In the randomized trial, no additional procedures beyond the normal care protocol will be required of the patients. The investigators will conduct the study through an established, IRB-approved multi-institutional network of surgeons. Success will be assessed via objective and subjective methods; complications will be tallied in a standardized fashion. Outcomes will be measured at two years.
To monitor post-market performance through evaluation of short and long-term performance via: - Efficacy - Safety - Patient reported outcomes
The investigators hypothesize that an innovative test device simulating transvaginal tape support will increase the performance and reproducibility of the diagnosis of urethral hypermobility before surgery for urinary incontinence. The main objective of this study is to compare two prognostic tests in their ability to predict the success (or failure) of the implementation of a suburethral TVT (tension-free vaginal tape) or TOT (trans-obturator tape) treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women. The Q-tip test (test mentioned in the French and international recommendations) is compared to test a new test (clip strip).