Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Clinical Trial
Official title:
Prospective Randomized Trial of Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stent Versus Externalized Modified-Salle Stent for Pyeloplasty
This prospective study, Randomized Trial of Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stent Versus Externalized Modified-Salle Stent for Pyeloplasty will consist of four steps: 1.) Enrolling subjects in the study and signing the consent form 2.) Randomly divide subjects into 2 groups, group 1 will have internal stent and group 2 will have external stent 3.) At the time of stent removal in the clinic or in the OR subjects parents/ subjects will fill a questionnaire about pain after the procedure, stent care and stent tolerance and 4) Data from the questionnaires and procedure cost will be collected and all the data will be analyzed
The pyeloplasty is a surgical procedure to treat kidney obstruction due to congenital or
acquired causes. Congenital like congenital stenosis in the Uretero-pelvic junction (UPJ) or
due to crossing blood vessels. Acquired causes like UPJ obstruction post stone disease or
renal trauma. For the congenital or the acquired causes the principle of the surgery is to
remove the UPJ stenosis (the diseased segment of the ureter) and reconnect the ureter to the
renal pelvis again. This procedure is known as dismembered pyeloplasty. It was described in
1940 by Anderson and since then still the gold standard procedure regardless of the approach
(open, laparoscopic or robotic). One of the principles of the procedure is to 'Splint' the
anastomosis, i.e put something across the anastomosis during the healing process that
includes internal and external stents. Also there are surgeons even don't believe in keeping
anything across the anastomosis, but they leave a nephrostomy tube only that will not cross
the anastomosis. In our division at CHP, we believe that we should keep a stent across the
anastomosis to help in the healing process and decrease that chance of intra-abdominal urine
leak and to increase the chance of success (90-99%). So for the internal stent, we use to
approaches to insert it: 1- Retrograde by cystoscopy and this will take 10 minutes before
starting the surgical procedure itself and we put the stent under fluoroscopy guidance and
this is the commonest way we use now to put the internal stents. 2- ante grade, and this is
basically inserting the stent during the surgical procedure itself from the kidney down to
the ureter and this is done without fluoroscopy. For the external stent we use one method, we
choose were we will leave the stent and then we create a small hole in the kidney and then
pull the stent through the hole and then create small hole in the abdominal fascia and then
the skin, all this done under direct vision and control. So now the sent is outside the
patient and connected directly to the kidney and the renal pelvis, then the distal part of
the stent will be inserted across the anastomosis and before closing the renal pelvis (also
under vision) toward the ureter. The external stent will be connected at the end of the
procedure to a urine bag. The type of the procedure will not affect out choice of the type of
the stent, as both stents can be inserted using the open, laparoscopic or robotic approach.
No difference in the choice for antibiotics or pain medication, again because we will perform
the same exact surgery (open, lap or robotic pyeloplasty) and so the same incisions. All out
patients receive pre and post-operative antibiotics and this will not be different in both
groups. For the alternative method, simply is choosing the first patient for example for
internal stent, the second patient we will use external stent, the third patient we will use
internal stent, then external , then internal..etc. We will not choose the patient according
to age or sex. Of course after we tell the parents and the patient about the study and they
choose not to enroll, we will use the internal stent as we usually do. Basically all the
pyeloplasty surgeries (open, Lap or robotic) are done as inpatient. All the patients will
spend the night in the hospital with Foley catheter and next day and after full evaluation
most of the patients will be sent home. All the pyeloplasty surgeries are done under general
anesthesia.
This is prospective study to compare the post-operative pain, stent tolerance, stent care and
total cost of a common procedure in pediatric urology which is pyeloplasty. The patients will
be randomized into 2 groups. All female subjects will undergo a standard urine pregnancy test
to rule out pregnancy. The first group will be patients who will have internal Double-J
stents and the second group will be patients who will have external Pippi-Salle
nephron-ureteric stent. The parents and the patient will be informed at the day of the
surgery about the type of stent he/she will have at the end of the surgery. In the
post-operative period, the patient will stay overnight (as for all the non-study patients)
and next morning his/her Foley catheter will be removed. The patient and his/her family will
receive instructions about the care for external stent (if he/she has one) and receive the
regular prescriptions for pain medicine and Oxybutynin (if the patient has internal stent).
All patients will be given contact information to call in case they have concerns or
questions about the study, the procedure itself or the stents.
Patients will be randomized to the two different post-operative stent treatments using block
randomization with permuted blocks. Block randomization will help ensure that by the end of
the study we have a reasonably similar number of patients in each treatment group. Given that
the investigators are necessarily unmasked in this study since they are placing the stents,
randomly permuted blocks will ensure that the investigators cannot identify the pattern and
predict the stent the next patient will receive.
The website www.randomization.com has been used to generate a randomization schedule using
block sizes of 9 and 6. This suggests an estimated 45 patients will be recruited at a single
site so that across 2 institutions about 90 patients will be recruited with approximately 30
patients total per treatment group by the end of the study.
The Principal Investigator is Dr. Michael C. Ost, M.D, chief of the division of Pediatric
urology with the research pediatric urology fellow Dr. Pankaj Dangel, M.D and the clinical
pediatric urology fellow Dr. Moira Dwyer, M.D. All the patients' names, details of the
procedures and the parents/patients questionnaires will be kept as part of medical records
that is protected by the HIPPA regulations for confidentiality.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT04884945 -
Pediatric Robotic Versus Open Pyeloplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02276924 -
Diagnostic Relevance of Laser Confocal Microscopy for the Screening of Upper Urinary Tract Tumors
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02812212 -
CTT on Renogram as an Early Marker of Significant Obstruction in Uretero-pelvic Junction Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02140970 -
Randomized Trial of NSAID vs Placebo Prior to Ureteral Stent Removal
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06349161 -
Long-term Outcome of Retroperitoneoscopic One-trocar-assisted Pyeloplasty: A Single-center and Single-surgeon Experience
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05895422 -
Functional Outcome After Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty for Adult Patients With UPJO
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06382233 -
The PRO-FUTURE Project
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05900375 -
Decision Aid for Parents of Infants With UPJO
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05739812 -
The Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Domestic Surgical Robot System in Urological Telesurgery
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01711996 -
The Correlation Between Renal Injury and Biomarkers in Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Patients
|