View clinical trials related to Ureterolithiasis.
Filter by:This study aims to compare three groups of patients who underwent uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) to evaluate whether stents could be eliminated after the procedure
A comparison on the outcomes of patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy using the Storz machine versus the Dornier machine.
Randomized comparison of patient outcomes following standard PCNL versus mini-PCNL.
Patients included in the study included the necessary tests U / A, K, Na, Cr, BUN, CBC, And U / C was checked and anesthesia counseling was done. Patients were prepared for action. The demographic and clinical data of the patients, including age, sex, size, and location of the stones were recorded. Then patients as random allocation were divided into two groups: A (control group, no basket of bases and group B (use of pneumatic synchronous buccal waist). The dividing person and the patients themselves were not aware of which group they were in. They were double-blind was. In each group, ureteroscopy was performed using a standard F9.5 ureteroscope. After reaching the rock in group A (control), the probe of the pneumatic crusher was passed through the working channel of the ureteroscope and began crushing the rock. During the crushing process, the minimum flow of water, flattening and the single-shot impact was used to minimize the stone's retropulsion. In group B (using a basket of wires3F) the helical type was passed through the four wires of the working channel of the ureteroscope and routed to the proximal part of the rock, and the stone was routed to the bowl, then the stone was ducted The gasket was kept, and the probe of the pneumatic crusher also passed through the working channel and proceeded to break it down. Conditions were observed during the stomach as the control group. Ureteroscopic crushing was performed by a urologist in both groups under similar technical conditions. Findings during and after the completion of crushing include the success, stone retropulsion or parts larger than 3 mm, which requires secondary measures (SWL - ureter stenting, resection ureteroscopy), the duration of stone breakdown and traumatic ureteric complications in both groups it is registered.
A double blind randomized controlled trial designed to compare pain control and safety with ketorolac and oxycodone in the post-operative setting for patients undergoing ureteroscopy for treatment of urinary stones. Patients are followed for five days after their surgery as they record their pain scores, medication utilization, and stent related symptoms.
Burst Wave Lithotripsy (BWL) is a novel method of urinary stone fragmentation that uses multi-cycle bursts of low amplitude ultrasound to induce stone fracture. This is in contrast to traditional extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), which employs a brief single compression/tensile cycle of high amplitude (shock) waves to achieve stone fracture. This is a single-arm feasibility study to test the ability of BWL to comminute (fragment) stones in humans.
Ultraslow full-power SWL versus slow power-ramping SWL in ureteric stones with high attenuation value
The investigator aims to perform a prospective and randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole(EPVL) in treating 4-10 mm ureteral stone.
The purpose of this study is to compare ureteroscopy with and without use of safety guide-wire in treatment of ureteral stone
This study will be conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of Parecoxib versus Paracetamol for treatment of acute renal colic due to ureteric stones.