Clinical Trials Logo

Upper Limb Spasticity clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Upper Limb Spasticity.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05956509 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

Study of Intramuscular Injections of ABBV-950 to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity in Adult Participants With Upper Limb Spasticity

Start date: January 12, 2024
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Spasticity is often observed as muscle tightness and stiffness in the upper and/or lower limbs. Upper limb spasticity can interfere with joint movement and its severity can range from mild to severe. Common causes of spasticity include cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and stroke. This study will assess how safe and effective ABBV-950 is in treating upper limb spasticity in adult post-stroke participants. Adverse events and change in symptoms will be assessed. ABBV-950 in an investigational drug being developed for treating spasticity. This study is conducted in 2 parts. In Part 1, participants are assigned to receive different doses of ABBV-950 or placebo. There is 1 in 4 chance that participants will be assigned to receive placebo. In Part 2, participants will be randomly assigned to receive BOTOX, ABBV-950, or placebo. There is 1 in 5 chance for participants to receive placebo. Approximately 297 adult post-stroke participants with upper limb spasticity will be enrolled at approximately 50 sites in the United States. In Part 1, participants will receive intramuscular (IM) injections of ABBV-950 or placebo on Day 1. In Part 2, participants will receive IM injections of BOTOX, ABBV-950, or placebo on Day 1. All participants will be followed for 24 weeks. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to the standard of care. Participants will attend regular clinic visits during the study. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

NCT ID: NCT04936542 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

A Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Dysport® and Botox® in Adults With Upper Limb Spasticity.

DIRECTION
Start date: June 23, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study is aiming to demonstrate the non-inferiority of AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) versus OnabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) as the primary safety endpoint, and the superiority of aboBoNT-A over onaBoNT-A with respect to duration of response as the key secondary efficacy endpoint when used at optimal doses according to approved prescribing information of each product.

NCT ID: NCT03821402 Completed - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

Efficacy and Safety of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Treatment of Adult Upper Limb Spasticity

JUNIPER
Start date: December 12, 2018
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-Ranging, trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity in Adults After Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury. The study will be conducted in the U.S.A., approximately 128 adult subjects from approximately 30 study centers will be randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to one of four treatment groups. The study consists of a 21-day screening period, a treatment visit and follow-up visits. The protocol was amended and the study was completed with fewer subjects than described in the initial protocol due to impact of COVID-19 on enrollment.

NCT ID: NCT02888548 Terminated - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

Randomised, Evaluation-blinded, Crossover, Controlled Study Assessing Dynamic Hand Splinting in Adults With Post-stroke Hemiplegia (Orthox)

ORTHOX
Start date: April 22, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Upper limb spasticity is currently mainly managed with local toxin treatments. Recent studies suggested combining botulinum toxin injections with splinting to optimise rehabilitation in spastic patients. However, one study focused exclusively on lower limb spasticity, the second on elbow flexor hypertonia, and the last on wrist and finger spasticity in children. A study was performed in adult patients with upper limb spasticity treated with botulinum toxin injections used as primary objective the tolerance for dynamic splinting. The authors noted that the need for botulinum toxin was reduced in 2 patients out of 6. No study has been conducted to date on the splinting + toxin combination in adults. Another study showed that stretching sessions over 2 weeks of a muscle just given botulinum toxin helped improve the toxin's efficacy 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection. For this reason, rehabilitation teams routinely prescribe 10 sessions of physiotherapy for 15 days after botulinum treatment. Based on this principle, we hypothesise that dynamic night splinting applied just after botulinum toxin treatment may also increase the toxin's efficacy. We chose a dynamic splint providing continuous stretching of the wrist and fingers in extension whilst allowing active flexion. Night splinting is thought to promote optimal functional use of the paretic upper limb during the day and thus prevent learned non-use, which could worsen the spasticity. Each patient will receive treatment cycles, whose results will be compared, so that each patient will act as his/her own control. The evaluation will be based on the Tardieu scale chosen for its greater inter-individual reproducibility and greater reliability to measure spasticity. The degree of extension of wrist and fingers provided by the splint will be adjusted to the patient's clinical condition with the elastic tensioners. The purpose of the splint is to maintain the stretch beyond the Tardieu spasticity angle at fast speed (V3) without reaching maximum extension, which could be harmful. This protocol is designed to determine whether dynamic night hand splinting combined with botulinum toxin injections will improve botulinum antispastic efficacy in adults with brain damage.

NCT ID: NCT02454803 Completed - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

Attainment of Person-centred Goals After Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Upper Limb Spasticity in Real Life Practice

ULIS III
Start date: January 2015
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The primary purpose for this study is to understand the effect of botulinum toxin as a treatment integrated in the management of spasticity (stiffness) in the arm and/or hand, arising from any neurological condition. The study will look at the types of goals that people choose for treatment, and the extent to which these are achieved in different individuals.

NCT ID: NCT02321436 Completed - Stroke Clinical Trials

Study to Assess Impact of Dysport Injections Early After Stroke on Upper Limb Spasticity Progression

ONTIME Pilot
Start date: December 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to investigate if early administration (i.e. within 12 weeks after stroke) of Dysport® 500 U injections may delay the appearance or the progression of upper limb symptomatic spasticity.

NCT ID: NCT01863901 Completed - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

Study Evaluating Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity Using the Cryo-Touch III Device

Start date: April 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A proof of concept study to evaluate the feasibility of safe and effective treatment of upper limb spasticity using the Cryo-Touch III Device.

NCT ID: NCT00945295 Completed - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

Efficacy and Safety Study of Botulinum Neurotoxin A With Rehabilitation Versus Botulinum Neurotoxin A Alone in Treatment of Post-stroke Spasticity

Start date: January 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine if a combination of botulinum neurotoxin A and rehabilitation therapy is better than botulinum neurotoxin A alone for improvement in function based on the Fugl-Meyer and other validated measures. Hypothesis: The combination of botulinum neurotoxin A and rehabilitation therapy will produce better functional improvement than botulinum neurotoxin A alone in post-stroke upper limb spasticity measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery after Stroke.

NCT ID: NCT00465738 Completed - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) for Upper Limb Spasticity

NT-Spin
Start date: February 2007
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) in the treatment of arm tightness (upper limb spasticity) using two different dilutions of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin).

NCT ID: NCT00430196 Completed - Clinical trials for Upper Limb Spasticity

BOTOX® Versus Zanaflex® for the Treatment of Post-Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury Upper Limb Spasticity

Start date: December 2003
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

In this study, we will compare BOTOX® versus Zanaflex ® for the treatment of muscle overactivity in the upper limb following stroke or brain traums. This is a critical step in the development of local intramuscular treatment for patients with muscle overactivity following an acute brain lesions, as opposed to the more classic oral treatments. This study will be a multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel, double blind study that enrolls subjects at twelve sites (including Mt. Sinai) throughout the United States and Europe. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BOTOX® compared to Zanaflex® in reducing upper limb muscle tone in post-stroke subjects, as well as evaluating changes in muscle tone-related disability and drug-therapy tolerance. This will be an 18 week study. Subjects are eligible if they have been medically stable with upper limb spasticity 6 months after their first stroke. Subjects will be randomized to one of three treatment groups: Treatment Group I - intramuscular BOTOX® plus oral placebo, Treatment Group II - intramuscular placebo plus oral Zanaflex®, Treatment Group III - intramuscular placebo plus oral placebo. The dose of BOTOX® will be at the discretion of the investigator with a maximum of 500 U per subject. The dose of the Zanaflex® will be 4mg/day to a maximum of 36mg/day. The study anticipates that 150 subjects will be enrolled to provide sufficient information to answer the primary objective of safety and efficacy of the study.