View clinical trials related to Umbilical Hernia.
Filter by:In this study, the investigators compared spinal anesthesia under ketofol (ketamine-propofol combination) sedation with general anesthesia in terms of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, respiratory parameters and cost in patients undergoing umbilical hernia operation. the investigator aimed to provide the most appropriate and hemodynamically stable option for the patient, to decrease the complication rates and to reduce the associated costs.
The goal of this study is to see which of two types of mesh is better for fixing an umbilical hernia. One type of mesh is an absorbable synthetic mesh, which goes away on its own in the body, and the other type of mesh is a non-absorbable mesh, which stays in the body forever. The researchers will check if the hernia comes back, how it affects the patient's quality of life, and if there are any problems after the surgery during a three-year period.
The aim of the study is to assess the recurrence rate and potential long-term complications, at least 48 months, after a robotic assisted transabdominal retromuscular approach (rTARUP technique) for the repair of an umbilical hernia.
The study attempts to quantify the relative risks for acute postoperative pain, complications rate, chronic postoperative pain (CPIP) and recurrence rate after different methods of repair of groin, umbilical and incisional hernia depending on surgical technique, mesh type and fixation suture material. For this purpose the investigators will analyze data from the Kalinigrad Hernia Registry (KHR).
The aim of this study is to measure the mesh shrinkage and the visualization of the mesh with MRI scan at 1 month and 13 months after robot assisted preperitoneal hernia repair using the visible CICAT mesh (Dynamesh®).
Umbilical hernia repair is one of the most common surgical performance in general surgery. Up to now, the use of suture repair has been the preferred technique for small umbilical hernia defects without any gold standard procedure. Mesh have been reserved to larger umbilical hernia defects. However, there is an increasing evidence that mesh reinforcement could be advantageous to lower the high recurrence rates also in smaller umbilical hernias. A remained important question is in what anatomical position the mesh should be placed. The investigators hypothesize that the use of an onlay mesh in small umbilical hernia defects can reduces recurrence rates without increasing postoperative complications compared to a suture repair.
Prospective, monocentric, observationnal study. The primary objective of this study is to identify if presurgical child or/and parental anxiety is predictive of chronic postsurgical pain in abdominal or urologic ambulatory surgery.
Ventral hernias can be repaired using a variety of techniques, with smaller defects often being amenable to minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches. For many years, the standard of care MIS approach to ventral hernias has been the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) approach, in which a large piece of mesh is placed inside of the abdomen and fixed to the inner abdominal wall using a combination of sutures and/or mechanical tacks. For selected patients, the IPOM approach has demonstrated benefits over open repair, including decreased postoperative length of stay and decreased incidence of surgical site infection. However, concern regarding long-term outcomes of placing mesh inside the abdomen have spurred the search for alternate approaches to MIS ventral hernia repair. This includes the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach, in which the retromuscular plane is accessed and developed so a large piece of mesh may be implanted outside of the abdominal cavity. The theoretical benefits of this approach are that patients may experience reduced pain because mechanical mesh fixation is not required (as compared to traditional IPOM approaches in which mesh is fixed to the inner abdominal wall) and that mesh is kept outside of the abdominal cavity and away from the viscera, allowing use of less expensive, uncoated mesh and theoretically reducing risk for long-term mesh related complications. While popularity of eTEP has grown, literature published regarding this approach has been mostly retrospective, consists of relatively small series of patients, and suffers from selection bias. For the one prospective study of eTEP published by Radu, et al, there was no comparator arm. The investigators will conduct a registry-based randomized controlled trial comparing MIS approaches for repair of small to medium-sized ventral hernias, specifically eTEP versus IPOM. This will occur through the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC). Our hypotheses are multiple: 1) Patients with ventral hernias undergoing eTEP will experience a 30% decrease in pain scores by postoperative day 1 compared to patients undergoing IPOM; 2) eTEP will be associated with higher median direct costs per case versus IPOM; 3) eTEP will be associated with equivalent 1-year hernia recurrence rates versus IPOM; 4) eTEP will be associated with significantly increased intraoperative surgeon workload compared to IPOM.
local repair of umbilical hernia in cirrhotic patient using intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique
Randomized clinical trial comparing open preperitoneal mesh, retromuscular mesh and suture repair for ventral hernias less than 3 cm diameter