Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00423787
Other study ID # RagweedMATAMPL301
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received January 17, 2007
Last updated June 16, 2010
Start date March 2007
Est. completion date March 2008

Study information

Verified date June 2010
Source Allergy Therapeutics
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug AdministrationCanada: Health Canada
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting ragweed pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL versus placebo in ragweed-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 ragweed pollen season


Description:

Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting ragweed pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale.

An earlier formulation of Ragweed MATAMPL developed by Allergy Therapeutics (UK), Ltd, available commercially in Canada since the 1980's, is 'Pollinex®-R'. 'Pollinex®-R' is formulated with modified allergens (allergoids) of ragweed pollen extract adsorbed onto L tyrosine at 4% w/v. Related formulations developed by ATL, available commercially in selected European countries since the 1970´s on a Named Patient Basis, are 'Pollinex Tree', 'Pollinex Grass', 'Pollinex Quattro Trees' (previously known as MATA tree + MPL), and 'Pollinex Quattro Grass' (previously known as MATA grass + MPL).

Ragweed MATAMPL contains an extract of ragweed pollens. This extract is chemically modified with glutaraldehyde to produce the active ingredient, an allergoid. Such modification reduces the reactivity of the extract with IgE antibody. However, a simultaneous reduction in other important immunological properties, such as IgG and T cell reactivity is not seen. The modified extract is adsorbed to L-tyrosine as a depot formulation. MPL®, a purified, detoxified glycolipid derived from the cell walls of Salmonella minnesota, is also included in the current product formulation. This excipient/adjuvant is included to increase the immunogenic effect of the product and to enhance the switch from an allergen-specific TH2 to TH1-like T cell profile.

The current formulation is designed to provide a product that will be efficacious with only 4 injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use with unmodified extracts. The product will also be safer to use than a formulation containing a similar mass of unmodified allergen extract as regards its ability to cause severe local allergic reactions or anaphylaxis, because of its reduced reactivity with IgE antibody. The modification is greater than 75%, so that only a small amount of unmodified allergen is remaining in the product.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL versus placebo in ragweed-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 ragweed pollen season.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 993
Est. completion date March 2008
Est. primary completion date November 2007
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 59 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Have given written informed consent;

- Are 18 to 59 years of age;

- history of moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis ascribed to ragweed pollen exposure that required repeated use of antihistamines, nasal steroids, and/or leukotriene modifiers;

- history of moderate to severe symptoms in the past ragweed pollen season;

- positive skin prick test to ragweed pollen and a positive RAST or equivalent test to ragweed pollen;

- positive skin prick test to histamine;

- negative skin prick test to the negative control;

- forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 80% of predicted, with a FEV1/FVC ratio = 70%;

- Women of childbearing potential must be using a medically acceptable method of birth control;

- able to understand and comply with study instructions;

- Demonstrate proper use of electronic diary with at least 85% compliance during the 1-week period between Visit 1 and Visit 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

- pregnant or lactating

- asthma requiring the daily use of controller medication;

- emergency room visit or admission for asthma in the 12 months prior to Visit 1;

- presence of secondary alteration at the affected organ (i.e., emphysema, bronchiectasis, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis);

- auto-immune disease;

- acute or subacute (historic) atopic dermatitis, chronic dermatitis, urticaria factitia, and/or urticaria due to physical/chemical influence or any other skin conditions which might interfere with the interpretation of the skin prick test results;

- history or presence of diabetes, cancer or concomitant illness that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would pose a safety risk or compromise the interpretation of efficacy for this ragweed immunotherapy;

- history of angioedema;

- manifest pulmonary or cardiac insufficiency;

- current malignant disease;

- disorders of tyrosine metabolism (i.e., alcaptonuria, tyrosinemia);

- acute or chronic infection;

- any clinically significant abnormal laboratory value at Visit 1;

- Perennial Allergens: positive skin prick test at Visit 1 to: house dust mites, molds, or epithelia. In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate or severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens, the subject is to be excluded. Exception: the source of the allergen (cat, dog, horse) can be avoided for the entire study.

- Springtime Flowering Plant Allergens: positive skin prick test at Visit 1 to birch, oak, sycamore, ash, red maple, black walnut, American elm, or poplar. In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Exception: one or all of the listed allergens must not be tested if they are not common to the Investigator's region or, if common to the region, the treatment phase of the study can be initiated at least 30 days after the end of the allergen(s) season or treatment can be completed 30 days before the anticipated start of the allergen(s) season.

- Summertime Flowering Plant Allergens: positive skin prick test at Visit 1 to grass pollen mix or Bermuda grass. In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Exception: No testing is required if there is no overlap between grass / Bermuda grass and ragweed season and if treatment can be completed 30 days before the start of grass / Bermuda grass season. Bermuda grass must not be tested if it is not common to the Investigator's region.

- Late Summer/Autumn Flowering Plant Allergens: positive skin prick test at Visit 1 to: goosefoot/lamb's quarters, firebush/kochia, or English plantain. In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Exception: some or all of the listed allergens must not be tested if they are not common to the Investigator's region.

- Have inadequate washout period prior to screening (Visit 1). The following washout periods prior to Visit 1 are acceptable:

- Oral or parenteral corticosteroids (1 month)

- Inhaled, ocular or intranasal corticosteroids (1 day)

- Mast cell stabilizers (7 days)

- Intranasal or systemic decongestants including cold preparations (1 day)

- Leukotriene modifiers (7 days)

- Afrin (oxymetazoline hydrochloride) (14 days)

- Antihistamines

- Once-daily or twice-daily antihistamines (7 days)

- Short-acting 3 or 4 times a day antihistamines (3 days)

- Hydroxyzine (14 days)

- H2-blockers (1 day)

- Other anti-inflammatory, anti-allergy, and any other medications which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with the study objectives should be considered on a case-by-case basis

- Topical skin medications on the forearms (14 days);

- Require use of beta blockers;

- Are unable to receive epinephrine therapy (i.e., use of epinephrine is contraindicated);

- Have a history of anaphylactic reactions to foods, insect venom, exercise, or drugs;

- Have been treated with a preparation containing MPL® within 6 months prior to Visit 1;

- Have diseases with a pathogenesis interfering with the immune response, and who have received medication which could interfere with the results of the study;

- Have a history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to the excipients of the study medication;

- Have a history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to study relief medication;

- Have already undergone hyposensitisation therapy with comparable allergen extracts; An exception will be allowed if prior immunotherapy with comparable allergen was successful, symptoms reappeared some time after stopping the immunotherapy, and the immunotherapy was completed = 3 years before Visit 1;

- Have participated in a clinical research trial with a new chemical substance within 4 weeks of Visit 1;

- Are unable or unwilling to cooperate with the Investigator and to comply with the protocol requirements, or not likely to complete the observation periods sufficiently;

- Have changed residence between geographical regions within the past 3 months

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Biological:
Ragweed MATA MPL
4 injections of increasing dose strength: 300 SU/0.5 ml 700 SU/0.5 ml 2000 SU/0.5 ml 6000 SU/0.5 ml

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada JBN Medical Diagnostic Services Inc. Burlington Ontario
Canada Co-Medica Health Centre Courtice Ontario
Canada McMaster University Hamilton Ontario
Canada Kanata Allergy Services Ltd. Kanata Ontario
Canada Omnispec Clinical Research Mirabel Quebec
Canada Allied Research International Inc Mississauga Ontario
Canada Alpha Medical Research Inc. Mississauga Ontario
Canada Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, The McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec
Canada Niagara Clinical Research Niagara Falls Ontario
Canada Northgate Medical Clinic North Bay Ontario
Canada Allergy & Asthma Research Centre Ottawa Ontario
Canada Centre De Recherche Appliquée en Allergie De Quebec Quebec
Canada Q&T Research Sherbrooke Quebec
Canada Asthma, Allergy & Immunology Toronto Ontario
Canada Gordon Sussman, 202 St. Clair Avenue West Toronto Ontario
Canada Manna Research Toronto Ontario
Canada Melimar Allergy Laboratory Inc. Toronto Ontario
United States Dr. Jeffrey Rosch Office and Research Centre Altoona Pennsylvania
United States Regional Allergy & Asthma Consultants Asheville North Carolina
United States Allergy & Asthma Consultants Atlanta Georgia
United States Clinical Research Atlanta Atlanta Georgia
United States Allergy & Asthma Associates Research Department Austin Texas
United States Lovelace Scientific Resources Allergy and Asthma Centre of Austin Austin Texas
United States Tricities Medical Research Bristol Tennessee
United States Allergy & Respiratory Center Canton Ohio
United States The Asthma Institute, PLLC Chattanooga Tennessee
United States University Consultants in Allergy/Immunlogy Chicago Illinois
United States DataQuest Medical Research Conyers Georgia
United States AARA Research Centre Dallas Texas
United States Valley Clinical Research Centre Easton Pennsylvania
United States Allergy & Asthma Care Centre Fargo North Dakota
United States North Texas Institute for Clinical Trials Fort Worth Texas
United States Northeast Georgia Research Center LLC Gainesville Georgia
United States Allergy & Arthritis Treatment Centre Gardner Massachusetts
United States Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Centre, S.C. Greenfield Wisconsin
United States Allergy & Asthma Associates Houston Texas
United States Iowa Clinical Research Corporation Iowa City Iowa
United States The Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Centre PA Knoxville Tennessee
United States Allergy and Consultants, PC Lilburn Georgia
United States Dean Foundation Medical Research Madison Wisconsin
United States University of Wisconsin, Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin
United States Centre For Clinical Trials Menomonee Falls Wisconsin
United States Advanced Healthcare SC Milwaukee Wisconsin
United States Clinical Research Institute Minneapolis Minnesota
United States Clinical Research Associates, Inc Nashville Tennessee
United States Sneeze, Wheeze and Itch Associates, LLC Normal Illinois
United States Atlantic Research Center LLC Ocean New Jersey
United States Creighton University Medical Center Division of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Omaha Nebraska
United States Midwest Allergy and Asthma Clinic Omaha Nebraska
United States Kansas City Allergy & Asthma Overland Kansas
United States The Asthma and Allergy Centre Papillion Nebraska
United States Allergy and Asthma Research of New Jersey Inc. Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Allergy and Clinical Immunology Associates Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Clinical Research Institute/West Health Building Plymouth Minnesota
United States North Carolina Clinical Research Raleigh North Carolina
United States Wake Research Associates Raleigh North Carolina
United States Commonwealth Clinic Research Specialists Inc. Richmond Virginia
United States National Clinical Research Richmond Virginia
United States AAIR Research Center Rochester New York
United States Biogenics Research Institute San Antonio Texas
United States Diagnostic Research Group San Antonio Texas
United States Sylvana Research Associates San Antonio Texas
United States Princeton Center for Clinical Research Skillman New Jersey
United States Timber Lane Allergy & Asthma Research South Burlington Vermont
United States The Clinical Research Center, LLC St. Louis Missouri
United States Clinical Research Atlanta Stockbridge Georgia
United States Pulmonary & Allergy Associates, P.A. Summit New Jersey
United States Toledo Center for Clinical Research Sylvania Ohio
United States The Medical Center at Teaneck Teaneck New Jersey
United States Asthma and Allergy Associates Upland Pennsylvania
United States Allergy & Asthma Care of Waco Waco Texas
United States Allergy Asthma Research Institute Waco Texas
United States The Centre for Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Waterbury Connecticut
United States Allergic Diseases SC West Allis Wisconsin
United States Ira Finegold, M.D. White Plains New York
United States Respiratory Medical Research Institute of Michigan Ypsilanti Michigan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Allergy Therapeutics

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATA MPL versus placebo as measured by the combined allergy symptom (eyes and nose)+ medication scores self-reported by subjects during the 3 peak weeks of the 2007 ragweed pollen season. 9 months No
Secondary Combined symptom + medication scores, Combined symptoms, Individual symptoms, Relief medication use, Specific immunological changes, quality of life, Health Assessments, Days absent from activities 9 months No
Secondary Adverse events, adverse reactions, clinical labs, ECG, and vitals 9 months Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00133159 - Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Grass Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in Patients Sensitized to Grass Pollen Phase 2
Completed NCT00133146 - Assessment of the Contribution of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) to a Grass Pollen Allergy Vaccine Phase 2
Terminated NCT00387478 - Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Tree MATAMPL,Tree MATA, and Placebo in Patients With Birch-Induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Phase 2
Completed NCT00414141 - Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Grass MATA MPL Phase 3
Completed NCT00258635 - Investigation of Safety+Efficacy of Different Doses of RagweedMATAMPL;Assessment of Residual Allergenicity Using Skin Prick Test Phase 2
Completed NCT00325338 - Follow-up Investigation of Efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL,and Placebo in Patients With Ragweed-induced Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT00109759 - Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of Tyrosine Adsorbed Ragweed Pollen Allergoid With MPL (Monophosphoryl Lipid A) Phase 1
Completed NCT00110786 - Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Ragweed MATAMPL, Pollinex-R and Placebo in Patients With Ragweed Allergy Phase 2
Completed NCT00104390 - Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Grass/Rye Pollen Allergoid Using Skin Prick Testing Phase 1
Completed NCT00104377 - Induction of Immunogenicity With Different Doses of Grass MATA in Subjects Allergic to Grass and Rye Pollen Phase 2
Completed NCT00116285 - Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Ragweed Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) Using Skin Prick Testing Phase 1
Completed NCT00118612 - Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Tree Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in Patients Sensitized to Tree Pollen Phase 2
Completed NCT00118625 - Assessment of the Contribution of Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) to a Tree Pollen Allergy Vaccine Phase 2
Completed NCT00113750 - Induction of Immunogenicity With Different Doses of TreeMATA in Subjects Allergic to Tree Pollen Phase 2
Completed NCT00241410 - Safety, Immunological Effect and Efficacy of the Combined Application of MPL and Grass Pollen Allergen Phase 1
Completed NCT00107705 - Assessment of Residual Allergenicity of Tree (Birch, Hazel, and Alder) Pollen Allergoid Using Skin Prick Testing Phase 1