View clinical trials related to Hypersensitivity, Immediate.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and outcome of systematic drug provocation testing with anaesthetics at therapeutic doses in adult patients undergoing diagnostic work-up for perioperative hypersensitivity.
The goal of this Method Comparison Study is to compare total IgE results obtained from at least 360 subjects aged less than 80 years old using four different testing arms comprising three types of samples and two testing methods. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Are the Kenota 1 Devices easy to use by untrained operators at a clinic environment? - Do tIgE results provided by the Kenota 1 Devices match the results provided by the FDA-cleared Phadia ImmunoCAP System? Subjects will be asked to donate two fingerstick whole blood samples and one venous blood draw.
This study investigates whether spores from birch rust fungi (Melampsoridium Betulinum = MB) may be the eliciting allergen in patients with seasonal airway allergy during autumn in North Norway. Patients with suspected allergy to MB are compared with non-allergic controls using data about allergic disease and daily allergic symptoms during autumn. Potential variations in allergic symptoms during season will be compared with spread of MB spores. Sensitation to MB and MB allergy are to be tested with skin prick test (SPT), measurements of spesific immunglobulin E (IgE) in serum, passive basophil activation test (pBAT) and nasal provocation test (NPT)
Acute per-anesthetic hypersensitivity reaction (HSA-PA) is a rapidly occurring systemic reaction following injection of a drug during anesthesia (mortality between 3 and 9%). The substances responsible for these reactions in France are curare in 60% of cases, followed by antibiotics. The main mechanism mentioned is an immediate systemic hypersensitivity immune reaction mediated by IgE antibodies (anaphylaxis). NeuroMuscular Blocking Agents (NMBA; curare) relax skeletal muscles to facilitate surgeries and permit intubation, but lead to adverse reactions: (a) severe hypersensitivity reactions (anaphylaxis) thought to rely on pre-existing anti-NMBA antibodies; (b) complications due to postoperative residual curarization. Identification of patients at risk remains suboptimal due to the lack of adequate tools to detect anti-NMBA antibodies. A capturing agent exists for only one out of the four most used NMBAs, allowing reversal of profound curarization. Case reports suggested that it might also ameliorate an ongoing anaphylaxis due to that NMBA. Based on strong preliminary results, our study proposes to characterize anti-drugs antibody repertoires in patients with various NMBA or antibiotics-anaphylaxis, describe activation pathways leading to anaphylaxis, develop and validate diagnostic and therapeutic molecules to ameliorate patient screening, NMBA-anaphylaxis and reverse profound neuromuscular block.
This is a Phase 1b/2, randomized, double-blind, multi-center study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary clinical efficacy of STMC-103H in neonates and infants at risk for developing allergic disease (Type 1 hypersensitivity). Subjects will be enrolled in a three-part sequential approach. Participants in the safety-run portion of the study (Part A1: 1 year to <6 years of age and A2: 1 month to <12 months of age) will receive 28 days of treatment with STMC-103H or placebo, followed by 28 days of follow-up. A Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will review safety data after all patients in each part complete 28 days of therapy prior to enrolling the next part. After A2, Part B will enroll 224 patients for 336 days of treatment with STMC-103H or placebo, followed by 336 days of follow-up. Stool, blood, and optional samples will be collected in Parts A2 and part B. Primary safety endpoints are frequency, type and severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), as well as findings on physical exams, vitals, and safety laboratories. The primary efficacy endpoint is incidence of physician-diagnosed atopic dermatitis at day 336.
To assess the efficacy of skin tests with platinum salts in patients suspects with immediate hypersensitivity reactions. All patients adressed in consultation to the Allergy Department of university hospital of nancy for an immediate hypersensitivity reaction to platinum salts between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively recruited.
Whilst validated tools exist to enable inpatient penicillin assessment and de-labelling, limited evidence is available regarding the safety and efficacy in the outpatient clinic. The ability to deliver point-of-care penicillin allergy testing for a large cohort of patients, without skin testing, will improve patient access to testing and utilization of preferred penicillin antibiotics.
In this project we study if spores from birch rust fungi (Melampsoridium Betulinum = MB) may be the eliciting allergen in patients with seasonal airway allergy during autumn in North Norway. Patients with suspected allergy to MB are compared with non-allergic controls using data about allergic disease and daily allergic symptoms during autumn. Daily spread of MB spores are compared with daily variations in allergic symptoms. Sensitization to MB and MB allergy are tested with skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) in serum, nasal provocation test and basophil activation test (BAT).
The clinical presentation of perioperative allergic and non-allergic clinical reactions is often considered undistinguishable while the accurate analysis of clinical cases shows striking clinical differences which might be predictive of the etiological diagnosis (allergic versus non-allergic). The four-step Ring and Messmer clinical scale helps to guide acute management of immediate hypersensitivity accordingly to the clinical presentation although this scale does not take into account the mechanism involved (i.e. allergic versus non-allergic). Non-allergic clinical reactions are usually non-life-threatening and may, sometimes, spontaneously resolve in contrast to allergic reactions which are mainly severe and life-threatening conditions, typically called anaphylaxis. The cornerstones of anaphylaxis management are fluid therapy and epinephrine. However, poor outcome has been reported as a result of delayed treatment and/or inappropriate management of perioperative anaphylaxis.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of STMC-103H compared to placebo in allergic subjects who are otherwise healthy.