View clinical trials related to Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:Pear Bio has developed an organ-on-a-chip device together with a computer vision pipeline through which the response of an individual patient's tumor to different chemotherapy regimens can be tested simultaneously ex vivo. This study will recruit patients with early TNBC who are planned for standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. The oncologist will be blinded to the response on the Pear Bio tool (the assay will be run in parallel with the patient's neoadjuvant chemotherapy). The primary objective of this study is to establish the sensitivity and specificity of Pear Bio's test against patient outcomes (pathological complete response).
Initially described in 2009 on LGR5 positive stem cells from intestine, organoids correspond to a 3D cell culture that preserves the organization and part of the initial function of the organ from which the cells were derived. They use the proliferation and differentiation properties of stem cells cultured in a three-dimensional matrix. These principles have been adapted to many human organs, including the breast. These culture conditions have thus allowed the establishment of cancer organoid lines that have the advantages of rapid amplification, a high rate of establishment success and unlimited proliferation potential. They are transfectable and cryopreservable. They are very close morphologically and genetically to the tumor from which they derive. Very recently, the in vivo response of orthotopic xenograft models of breast cancer organoids has been correlated to the in vitro response of these same organoids. In addition, the in vitro response of various of these models to PARP inhibitors was linked to the presence of the BRCA1/2 mutant signature, highlighting the potential of these models to predict patient response to these treatments. Furthermore, one study demonstrated the value of using organoids derived from metastatic gastrointestinal tumors to predict patient response to cancer treatments (100% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 88% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value.
Study LCB-1801-001 is an open-label, Phase 1, dose escalation (Part A) and expansion (Part B), first-in-human clinical study of NI-1801 in subjects with advanced, metastatic, or recurrent solid malignancies expressing mesothelin (MSLN). The dose escalation part (Part A) of the study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of NI-1801, administered intravenously (IV) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and non-tolerated toxic dose (NTD) of both the first dose and subsequent doses of NI-1801. The expansion part (Part B) will further evaluate the safety and efficacy of NI-1801 administered at or below the MTD in up to 20 subjects in order to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Treatments will be administered in 28-day cycles for up to 6 months until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or subject/Investigator decision to withdraw. NI-1801 treatment can extend beyond 6 cycles for those patients who do not have disease progression.
To evaluate the efficacy of Eribulin in Combination With Anti-PD-1 Antibody in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
This is an observational case-control study of tissues collected from women with ER+HER2- breast cancers. The immune environments of these cancers will be compared to triple negative and HER2+ breast cancers. No randomization or changes to standard of care treatment will occur as part of the study.
The objective of this study is to explore and evaluate the efficacy of tucidinostat combined with metronomic capecitabine in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
This research is being done to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Onvansertib in combination with Paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) that has spread to other parts of the body. The names of the study interventions involved in this study are: - Onvansertib - Paclitaxel
The primary objective of this study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) between sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in participants with previously untreated, locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer whose tumors do not express programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or in participants previously treated with anti-programmed cell death (ligand or protein) 1 (Anti-PD-(L)1) Agents in the early setting whose tumors do express PD-L1.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) between sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) and pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) and pembrolizumab in participants with previously untreated, locally advanced inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, whose tumors express programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1).
A Study of XMT-1660 in Solid Tumors