Effects of Pressure Release of Myofascial Trigger Points on Mechanical Neck Pain.

Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effects of Pressure Release of Myofascial Trigger Points on Mechanical Neck Pain. Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06051799
• Other study ID #: 23/186-EC_X_Tesis
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 25, 2023
• Est. completion date: September 20, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: September 2023
• Source: Universidad Complutense de Madrid
• Contact: Iván Batuecas Sánchez, PhD
• Phone: +34699654655
• Email: ivanbatu[@]ucm.es
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study aims to compare the effectiveness of myofascial trigger point treatment using pressure release versus a control group in patients with mechanical neck pain, randomly assigned. In both groups a protocol of therapeutic exercise and postural correction will be carried out

Description:

With the present investigation it is wondered whether the choice of manual therapy techniques, specifically the pressure release of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, provide significant benefits in combination with therapeutic exercise and postural hygiene (treatment group), as opposed to the unique application of therapeutic exercise and postural hygiene (control group), thus constituting a treatment of choice in patients with mechanical neck pain. A treatment protocol of one session per week will be carried out, and a follow-up two weeks after the end of the treatment protocol. If, as postulated, pressure release is more effective than the treatment received by the control group, the choice of this type of technique for myofascial pain syndrome would benefit a high percentage of people who often come asking for treatment in pain treatment centers. Pressure release provides a painless manual stimulus, thus effectively resolving the symptomatology of myofascial trigger points without the need for invasive treatments or medication, which may have more contraindications.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 104
• Est. completion date: September 20, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: July 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 55 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects between 18 and 55 years of age in order to avoid degenerative phenomena.
• Have suffered from neck pain at least once in the last month.
• Active or latent myofascial trigger points in the Upper Trapezius and Sternocleidomastoid muscles.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with recent trauma (last 6 months) to the upper quadrant or spine.
• Patients with pathologies involving malignant neoplasms.
• Surgery on the trunk or upper limb in the last six months.
• Patients undergoing pharmacological or physiotherapy treatment at the time of the test.
• Pregnancy.
• No myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius or sternocleidomastoid muscles.
• Refusal to sign the consent form for the study or not being able to do so.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Facial Pain
• Fibromyalgia
• Myofacial Pain
• Myofascial Pain Syndrome of Neck
• Myofascial Pain Syndromes
• Neck Pain
• Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial

Intervention

Other:
• Myofascial trigger points pressure release
Patient lying down in the supine position, Therapist do a first and second finger pincer grasp is performed on the myofascial trigger points located on the upper trapezius muscle and sternocleidomastoid muscle, this pressure will be increased as the therapist perceives a reduction in soft tissue resistance under the finger over a period of 90 seconds. Previous studies indicate no difference between 60 and 90 seconds of pressure. It will be performed on as many trigger points as we find in each muscle associated with the study.
• Therapeutic exercise and postural hygiene
Therapeutic exercise and postural hygiene: A progression of exercises with contraction of the deep neck flexor muscles will be included in the first session. Subjects will be taught to perform a slow and controlled craniocervical flexion. Subjects will then be trained to be able to progressively maintain craniocervical flexion through feedback from an air device (Stabilizer™, Chattanooga Group Inc., Chattanooga, TN) placed behind the neck. This sensor monitors the slight flattening of the cervical curve that occurs with contraction of the craniocervical deep flexor musculature. It should be performed at least once a day during the treatment regimen. Also Postural correction exercises carried out regularly throughout the day, especially when seated. Indications are given to avoid pelvic retroversion and maintain a natural lumbar lordosis while performing retraction and adduction of the scapulae and gently lengthening the spine.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Fisioterapia Los Molinos	Getafe	Madrid

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (26)

Beer A, Treleaven J, Jull G. Can a functional postural exercise improve performance in the cranio-cervical flexion test?--a preliminary study. Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 4. — View Citation

Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Balk GA, Stewart RE. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2545-2550. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09. — View Citation

Cagnie B, Castelein B, Pollie F, Steelant L, Verhoeyen H, Cools A. Evidence for the Use of Ischemic Compression and Dry Needling in the Management of Trigger Points of the Upper Trapezius in Patients with Neck Pain: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Reha — View Citation

Cerezo-Tellez E, Torres-Lacomba M, Mayoral-Del Moral O, Sanchez-Sanchez B, Dommerholt J, Gutierrez-Ortega C. Prevalence of Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study. Pain Med. 2016 Dec — View Citation

Chao YW, Lin JJ, Yang JL, Wang WT. Kinesio taping and manual pressure release: Short-term effects in subjects with myofasical trigger point. J Hand Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;29(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Nov 6. — View Citation

De Meulemeester KE, Castelein B, Coppieters I, Barbe T, Cools A, Cagnie B. Comparing Trigger Point Dry Needling and Manual Pressure Technique for the Management of Myofascial Neck/Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 20 — View Citation

de Zoete RM, Armfield NR, McAuley JH, Chen K, Sterling M. Comparative effectiveness of physical exercise interventions for chronic non-specific neck pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of 40 randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. — View Citation

Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Dommerholt J. International Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria and Clinical Considerations of Myofascial Trigger Points: A Delphi Study. Pain Med. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):142-150. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx207. — View Citation

Garcia Campayo J, Rodero B, Alda M, Sobradiel N, Montero J, Moreno S. [Validation of the Spanish version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in fibromyalgia]. Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Oct 18;131(13):487-92. doi: 10.1157/13127277. Spanish. — View Citation

Ghorbani F, Kamyab M, Azadinia F. Smartphone Applications as a Suitable Alternative to CROM Device and Inclinometers in Assessing the Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain. J Chiropr Med. 2020 Mar;19(1):38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm. — View Citation

Gomez-Perez L, Lopez-Martinez AE, Ruiz-Parraga GT. Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). J Pain. 2011 Apr;12(4):425-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.08.004. — View Citation

Gonzalez T, Balsa A, Sainz de Murieta J, Zamorano E, Gonzalez I, Martin-Mola E. Spanish version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire: reliability and validity. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001 Jan-Feb;19(1):41-6. — View Citation

Grieve R, Barnett S, Coghill N, Cramp F. The prevalence of latent myofascial trigger points and diagnostic criteria of the triceps surae and upper trapezius: a cross sectional study. Physiotherapy. 2013 Dec;99(4):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.04.002. — View Citation

Hou CR, Tsai LC, Cheng KF, Chung KC, Hong CZ. Immediate effects of various physical therapeutic modalities on cervical myofascial pain and trigger-point sensitivity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Oct;83(10):1406-14. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34834. — View Citation

Jull GA, O'Leary SP, Falla DL. Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.003. — View Citation

Melian-Ortiz A, Varillas-Delgado D, Laguarta-Val S, Rodriguez-Aparicio I, Senent-Sansegundo N, Fernandez-Garcia M, Roger-de Ona I. [Reliability and concurrent validity of the app Goniometer Pro vs Universal Goniometer in the determination of passive knee — View Citation

Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; CONSORT. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: — View Citation

Munoz-Munoz S, Munoz-Garcia MT, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Arroyo-Morales M, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C. Myofascial trigger points, pain, disability, and sleep quality in individuals with mechanical neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Oct;35(8):608-13. — View Citation

Oliveira-Campelo NM, de Melo CA, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Machado JP. Short- and medium-term effects of manual therapy on cervical active range of motion and pressure pain sensitivity in latent myofascial pain of the upper trapezius muscle: a randomized con — View Citation

Park G, Kim CW, Park SB, Kim MJ, Jang SH. Reliability and usefulness of the pressure pain threshold measurement in patients with myofascial pain. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;35(3):412-7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.412. Epub 2011 Jun 30. — View Citation

Pecos-Martin D, Ponce-Castro MJ, Jimenez-Rejano JJ, Nunez-Nagy S, Calvo-Lobo C, Gallego-Izquierdo T. Immediate effects of variable durations of pressure release technique on latent myofascial trigger points of the levator scapulae: a double-blinded random — View Citation

Pourahmadi MR, Bagheri R, Taghipour M, Takamjani IE, Sarrafzadeh J, Mohseni-Bandpei MA. A new iPhone application for measuring active craniocervical range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain: a reliability and validity study. Spine J. 2018 M — View Citation

Rodriguez-Sanz J, Malo-Urries M, Corral-de-Toro J, Lopez-de-Celis C, Lucha-Lopez MO, Tricas-Moreno JM, Lorente AI, Hidalgo-Garcia C. Does the Addition of Manual Therapy Approach to a Cervical Exercise Program Improve Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Ch — View Citation

Tsang SMH, So BCL, Lau RWL, Dai J, Szeto GPY. Effects of combining ergonomic interventions and motor control exercises on muscle activity and kinematics in people with work-related neck-shoulder pain. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Apr;118(4):751-765. doi: 10.1 — View Citation

Tsiringakis G, Dimitriadis Z, Triantafylloy E, McLean S. Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback improves pain and disability in patients with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 De — View Citation

Vohralik SL, Bowen AR, Burns J, Hiller CE, Nightingale EJ. Reliability and validity of a smartphone app to measure joint range. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;94(4):325-30. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000221. — View Citation

* Note: There are 26 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Visual analogue scale. Base	Measure of pain intensity. A mark is placed on a 10-centimetre line with the left end being no pain at all and the right end being the worst pain imaginable.	Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session
Primary	Visual analogue scale. Post treatment	Measure of pain intensity. A mark is placed on a 10-centimetre line with the left end being no pain at all and the right end being the worst pain imaginable.	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions
Primary	Visual analogue scale. Follow up	Measure of pain intensity. A mark is placed on a 10-centimetre line with the left end being no pain at all and the right end being the worst pain imaginable.	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol
Primary	Pressure pain threshold. Base	Measurement of pain threshold to pressure with Fischer algometer. The algometer is placed perpendicular to the myofascial trigger point previously marked by the therapist. Once in place, the pressure is increased at a rate of 1 kilogram per second (kg per sec) until the patient begins to feel discomfort. At this point, the application is stopped. Three measurements are taken and the average is calculated.	Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session
Primary	Pressure pain threshold. Post treatment	Measurement of pain threshold to pressure with Fischer algometer. The algometer is placed perpendicular to the myofascial trigger point previously marked by the therapist. Once in place, the pressure is increased at a rate of 1 kilogram per second (kg per sec) until the patient begins to feel discomfort. At this point, the application is stopped. Three measurements are taken and the average is calculated.	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions
Primary	Pressure pain threshold. Follow up	Measurement of pain threshold to pressure with Fischer algometer. The algometer is placed perpendicular to the myofascial trigger point previously marked by the therapist. Once in place, the pressure is increased at a rate of 1 kilogram per second (kg per sec) until the patient begins to feel discomfort. At this point, the application is stopped. Three measurements are taken and the average is calculated.	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol
Primary	Cervical Disability Index. Base	Results on the Northwick Park Cervical Spine Disability Questionnaire, translated and validated in Spanish. The pre-questionnaire consists of 9 questions related to pain intensity, sleep, weight bearing, leisure and social activities, work and driving. Each question has 5 possible answers ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 represents the absence of disability and 4 the maximum degree of disability. Similarly, the subsequent questionnaire consists of 10 questions and the same answers. Taking this into account, the maximum score that can be obtained would be 36 in the pre-questionnaire or 40 in the post-questionnaire (categorised as high disability).	Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session
Primary	Cervical Disability Index. Post treatment	Results on the Northwick Park Cervical Spine Disability Questionnaire, translated and validated in Spanish. The pre-questionnaire consists of 9 questions related to pain intensity, sleep, weight bearing, leisure and social activities, work and driving. Each question has 5 possible answers ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 represents the absence of disability and 4 the maximum degree of disability. Similarly, the subsequent questionnaire consists of 10 questions and the same answers. Taking this into account, the maximum score that can be obtained would be 36 in the pre-questionnaire or 40 in the post-questionnaire (categorised as high disability).	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions
Primary	Cervical Disability Index. Follow up	Results on the Northwick Park Cervical Spine Disability Questionnaire, translated and validated in Spanish. The pre-questionnaire consists of 9 questions related to pain intensity, sleep, weight bearing, leisure and social activities, work and driving. Each question has 5 possible answers ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 represents the absence of disability and 4 the maximum degree of disability. Similarly, the subsequent questionnaire consists of 10 questions and the same answers. Taking this into account, the maximum score that can be obtained would be 36 in the pre-questionnaire or 40 in the post-questionnaire (categorised as high disability).	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol
Primary	Pain catastrophising scale. Base	It is the set of cognitive and emotional processes consisting of having negative thoughts about the future that predispose to the chronification of pain. Self-administered scale made up of 13 items, each item scored from 0 to 4. The total score range is from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate a higher level of catastrophism. It is one of the most widely used to assess the pain catastrophising construct.	Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.
Primary	Pain catastrophising scale. Post treatment	It is the set of cognitive and emotional processes consisting of having negative thoughts about the future that predispose to the chronification of pain. Self-administered scale made up of 13 items, each item scored from 0 to 4. The total score range is from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate a higher level of catastrophism. It is one of the most widely used to assess the pain catastrophising construct.	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions
Primary	Pain catastrophising scale. Follow up	It is the set of cognitive and emotional processes consisting of having negative thoughts about the future that predispose to the chronification of pain. Self-administered scale made up of 13 items, each item scored from 0 to 4. The total score range is from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate a higher level of catastrophism. It is one of the most widely used to assess the pain catastrophising construct.	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol
Primary	Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (ETK-11). Base	Translated into Spanish. It is one of the most frequently used measures to assess pain-related fear of movement in patients with chronic pain. The ETK-11 is an 11-item self-questionnaire in its Spanish version that measures fear of movement and pain. The total score of the ETK-11 is between 11 - 44 points and each item has a likert scale that scores from 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement and pain. The ETK-11 has two subscales: activity avoidance and harm avoidance.	Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.
Primary	Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (ETK-11). Post treatment	Translated into Spanish. It is one of the most frequently used measures to assess pain-related fear of movement in patients with chronic pain. The ETK-11 is an 11-item self-questionnaire in its Spanish version that measures fear of movement and pain. The total score of the ETK-11 is between 11 - 44 points and each item has a likert scale that scores from 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement and pain. The ETK-11 has two subscales: activity avoidance and harm avoidance.	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions
Primary	Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (ETK-11). Follow up	Translated into Spanish. It is one of the most frequently used measures to assess pain-related fear of movement in patients with chronic pain. The ETK-11 is an 11-item self-questionnaire in its Spanish version that measures fear of movement and pain. The total score of the ETK-11 is between 11 - 44 points and each item has a likert scale that scores from 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement and pain. The ETK-11 has two subscales: activity avoidance and harm avoidance.	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol
Secondary	Swallow-wall distance. Base	Patient in a sitting position, back against the wall, the distance in centimetres is measured using a tape measure or ruler between the swallow and the surface of the wall during the maximum effort to bring the head close to the wall. The chin should not be lifted higher than horizontal. The average of both sides gives the final result. A value greater than 15 centimetres is considered pathological.	Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.
Secondary	Swallow-wall distance. Post treatment	Patient in a sitting position, back against the wall, the distance in centimetres is measured using a tape measure or ruler between the swallow and the surface of the wall during the maximum effort to bring the head close to the wall. The chin should not be lifted higher than horizontal. The average of both sides gives the final result. A value greater than 15 centimetres is considered pathological.	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions
Secondary	Swallow-wall distance. Follow up	Patient in a sitting position, back against the wall, the distance in centimetres is measured using a tape measure or ruler between the swallow and the surface of the wall during the maximum effort to bring the head close to the wall. The chin should not be lifted higher than horizontal. The average of both sides gives the final result. A value greater than 15 centimetres is considered pathological.	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol
Secondary	Cervical flexion-extension. Base	Using the "Goniometer pro" mobile app. The patient performs flexion and extension movements and the inclinometer of the mobile device records the degrees of movement. Three measurements are taken and the average is recorded.	Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.
Secondary	Cervical flexion-extension. Post treatment	Using the "Goniometer pro" mobile app. The patient performs flexion and extension movements and the inclinometer of the mobile device records the degrees of movement. Three measurements are taken and the average is recorded.	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions.
Secondary	Cervical flexion-extension. Follow up	Using the "Goniometer pro" mobile app. The patient performs flexion and extension movements and the inclinometer of the mobile device records the degrees of movement. Three measurements are taken and the average is recorded.	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol.
Secondary	Cervical rotation. Base	Via mobile application "Goniometer pro". The patient performs a cervical rotation movement to the left and right side and the degrees of movement are recorded by recording the angular translation of the mobile device on the apex of the skull. Three measurements are taken and the mean is recorded.	BaselinePrior to the first treatment session.
Secondary	Cervical rotation. Post treatment	Via mobile application "Goniometer pro". The patient performs a cervical rotation movement to the left and right side and the degrees of movement are recorded by recording the angular translation of the mobile device on the apex of the skull. Three measurements are taken and the mean is recorded.	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions.
Secondary	Cervical rotation. Follow up	Via mobile application "Goniometer pro". The patient performs a cervical rotation movement to the left and right side and the degrees of movement are recorded by recording the angular translation of the mobile device on the apex of the skull. Three measurements are taken and the mean is recorded.	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol.
Secondary	Side bending. Base	Using the "Goniometer pro" mobile app. The patient performs a lateral tilt movement to the right and left side and the degrees of movement are recorded using the inclinometer on the mobile device. The device is placed vertically on the prominence of the spinous process of the 7th cervical vertebra following the tilt movement. Three measurements shall be taken and the mean shall be recorded.	Baseline. Prior to the first treatment session.
Secondary	Side bending. Post treatment	Using the "Goniometer pro" mobile app. The patient performs a lateral tilt movement to the right and left side and the degrees of movement are recorded using the inclinometer on the mobile device. The device is placed vertically on the prominence of the spinous process of the 7th cervical vertebra following the tilt movement. Three measurements shall be taken and the mean shall be recorded.	Up to 4 weeks. After the end protocol of four treatment sessions.
Secondary	Side bending. Follow up	Using the "Goniometer pro" mobile app. The patient performs a lateral tilt movement to the right and left side and the degrees of movement are recorded using the inclinometer on the mobile device. The device is placed vertically on the prominence of the spinous process of the 7th cervical vertebra following the tilt movement. Three measurements shall be taken and the mean shall be recorded.	Follow-up two weeks after the end of the four-session treatment protocol.