View clinical trials related to Trauma.
Filter by:Objectives: The acute care of pelvic fractures has improved recently however there are no formal guidelines for rehabilitation of these types of fractures. Patients have long periods of non-weight bearing causing muscle wastage. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has proven to minimise muscle loss. However, this has not previously been investigated within this patient population. Design: Double blind, randomised, feasibility study. Setting: NHS trust hospital setting. Participants: Nine patients with surgically fixed pelvic fractures were randomly allocated at six weeks post fracture. Interventions: The intervention group completed six weeks of NMES. The placebo group used transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Main outcome measures: Peak torque (Nm) was calculated in the operated limb at 12 weeks using the non-operated limb as a baseline. Compliance and intensity levels were recorded. Feasibility of NMES was evaluated using a feasibility questionnaire. Pain was measured at six and 12 weeks using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Major Trauma Outcome Measures Study (MaTOMS): A feasibility Study into using outcome measures in major trauma patients. At present patients who suffer major trauma (multiple, serious injuries that could result in death or serious disability e.g. serious head injuries and multiple fractures), are now able to survive due to advances in modern medicine. Unfortunately they may be left with long term disabilities such as problems with performing day to day activities. We currently do not know how bad these disabilities are or have any way of judging any differences between the outcomes of different hospitals. MaTOMS is a feasibility study taking place in one hospital, the John Radcliffe Hospital which aims to help answer these questions by developing a set of structured interviews that can be used after an injury to find out about patient outcomes. It will identify how difficult or easy it is to collect the data and information outlined in this project, and whether the types of data and information collected as part of the interviews are a good indicator of a patient's outcomes. Over 30 months the study will recruit up to 100 patients who are aged 2 years and over who have been admitted following major trauma. Major trauma will be defined as a score of 9 or more on the Injury Severity Score, a widely used system to stratify those who suffer an injury. Those who agree to take part following a consent process will undergo structured interviews both in hospital and twice via telephone in the year following discharge. Some participants will take part in an additional interview either asking about their experience of answering the questions during the structured interview or exploring their experience and feelings about their traumatic injury to see if our structured interviews are missing any aspect of their experience. The main objectives for this feasibility study is to test the feasibility of routine collection of outcome measurement data following major trauma.
The aim of this study is to compare trauma related to others sport to trauma due to trampoline in pediatric emergencies of Rennes.
Audit filters for monitoring trauma care quality are regarded as one of the most essential components of trauma quality improvement programmes; however, there is a paucity of evidence that shows that audit filters are associated with improved outcomes. Therefore, our aim is to assess if institutional implementation of audit filters reduce mortality in adult trauma patients.
The use of a pre-arrival and pre-departure trauma checklist to optimize care has not yet been studied. The Alberta Children's Hospital (ACH) Trauma Checklist was developed by the ACH Resuscitation Council with input from the ACH Trauma Program. The purpose of this study is to determine if the introduction of the ACH Trauma Checklist as a cognitive aid, coupled with an educational session, will improve clinical performance in a simulated environment. The investigators plan to conduct a pilot, randomized control trial assessing the impact of the ACH trauma checklist on time to critical interventions on a simulated pediatric patient by multidisciplinary teams. The investigators hypothesize that teams who use a trauma checklist as a cognitive aid will have faster initiation of key clinical interventions within a simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation. Improvements in performance in a simulated environment with this tool may translate to similar results in the clinical setting.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early administration of low-dose intranasal ketamine analgesic agents in patients with moderate to severe pain in the ED in reducing the need for opioid or non opioids analgesic agents.
To evaluate return to work (RTW) status after moderate and major trauma in Hong Kong at one year after injury. To derive reliable prediction models for return to work.
Pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI) occur in up to 10% of pelvic fractures. It remains controversial whether initial urethral realignment after PFUI decreases rates of urethral obstruction and the need for subsequent urethral procedures. The retrospective record review should determine the utility of acute urethral realignment after PFUI.
The aim of this study is too determine the effect of enteral protein supplementation on biochemical measures of inflammation and protein metabolism in critically ill surgical patients. The investigators will also collect data on important clinical outcomes, including infectious complications, duration of mechanical ventilation and other measures of recovery from critical illness. Hypothesis: That early supplemental protein will increase serum concentrations of transthyretin at three weeks after the onset of illness or injury. Secondarily, the investigators will test whether supplementation, reduces infectious complications and increases ventilator-free days.
There is a lack of studies on treatment effect in traumatised refugees. Recent findings indicate that emotion regulation deficits play a key role in PTSD also among traumatized refugees and highlight the importance and potential directions for the development of an emotion regulation training for refugees. In this study, the investigators therefore want to examine the effectiveness of a new, transdiagnostic, cultural-sensitive group therapy, which systematically teaches specific emotion regulation strategies. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the emotion regulation training, delivered in group format or a wait list control condition. The study takes place in cooperation with REFUGIO Munich, which is a treatment centre specialised in the treatment of traumatised refugees. Clinicians will deliver the treatment to traumatized asylum seekers and refugees that report difficulties in emotion regulation. The investigators will examine if refugees and asylum seekers in the intervention group will show improvements in psychological symptoms, social functioning as well as in emotion regulation in comparison to a wait list control group which will receive the treatment after the intervention group has completed. The group therapy covers 14 sessions and has a cognitive-behavioural background. It focuses on conveying strategies to cope with intense feelings and the patients should gain a sense of self-efficacy and control over their trauma-relevant feelings and symptoms. Qualified interpreters will be used in the assessments as well as group therapies.