Clinical Trials Logo

Tooth Fractures clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Tooth Fractures.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06324747 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Badly Broken Tooth in a Socket Type II Eligible to be Replaced by Immediate Implant

Soft Tissue Stability in Immediate Implant Placement Using (VST) Versus Conventional Flap in Type II Extraction Sockets

Start date: October 23, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study compare between the vestibular socket therapy (VST) and the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection in immediate implant placement in type II extraction socket in the esthetic zone. The technique of vestibular socket therapy (VST), introduced by Elaskry, enables the placement of implants immediately while simultaneously rehabilitating the entire socket, resulting in excellent esthetic and functional outcomes that meet the expectations of patients. VST involves socket augmentation through a minimally invasive vestibular access incision, eliminating the need for the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection, regardless of the extent of socket compromise.

NCT ID: NCT05816707 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Tooth Extraction Status Nos

The Assessment of Curcuma Longa Potentials for Soft and Hard Tissue Healing in Fresh

Start date: May 1, 2024
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The study will be conducted on 30 patients with split mouth design patients will be divided into curcumin and PRF groups patients will have bilateral tooth extraction one side will receive curcumin/PRF and the other side will be control soft tissue healing and bone quality will be evaluated post-operative

NCT ID: NCT05505084 Recruiting - Caries Clinical Trials

Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction.

Start date: August 15, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Bone resorption after a tooth extraction is a generally accepted knowledge and has been demonstrated by many animal and human studies. Especially during the first three months followed by the tooth extraction, the volume of bone may change significantly without any interference. Thus, doing a ridge preservation procedure following the extraction is a common standard of care method to maintain the socket volume if implant placement is considered as a treatment option in the future. A variety of materials and methods have been used for ridge preservation. However, it's still inconclusive to determine the best material to maintain the ridge dimension, especially for membrane placement that allows for space maintenance to protect the grafting material. Furthermore, there is no evidence to show any treatment rationale is superior to any other ridge preservation method. In general, the membrane serves the function of the barrier and space protector. The periodontal surgeon use membranes to exclude the epithelium growth and to limit the collapse of the soft tissue into the healing alveolar socket. Regarding resorbable and non-resorbable membrane materials, both serve the function of protecting the graft material from the oral cavity. However, there are also many demonstrating that without membranes the extraction socket healed nicely without any interferences. The question to us is: Do we need the membrane to exclude the epithelium or any kind of surgical dressing material is sufficient enough to preserve the volume of the extracted ridge? The object of this study is to compare five popular membranes on the market that present different characteristics of the membranes.

NCT ID: NCT05201664 Recruiting - Tooth Avulsion Clinical Trials

Surgical Extrusion: Volumetric and Insertion Analysis at 6 Months.

Start date: October 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim is to clinically evaluate the changes that occur in teeth that have undergone surgical extrusion treatment. Three parameters will be recorded before and 6 months after treatment: the position and the volume of the soft tissue, and the level of periodontal attachment.

NCT ID: NCT05127629 Recruiting - Tooth Decay Clinical Trials

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Different Wound Closure Methods in Immediate Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone

Start date: April 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Implant-supported restorations have become one of the best treatment options for patients with tooth loss, with predictable long-term success rates and clinical outcomes. Immediate implant placement means the implant is placed immediately after tooth extraction. It can significantly reduce treatment time because extraction socket healing and implant osseointegration occur simultaneously. Immediate implant placement has many benefits, reducing the overall treatment time, reducing the patient's surgical procedures, and reducing surgical trauma (no flap reversal). However, the treatment also has significant limitations, including the inability to predict the possibility of bone and soft tissue healing, and the possibility of subsequent unfavorable esthetic outcomes. However, the evidence regarding soft and hard tissue and aesthetic outcomes in patients treated with immediate implants in the aesthetic area remains inconclusive. As the aesthetic success of implant restorations is increasingly valued over implant survival, there are significant clinical benefits to addressing immediate implant bone tissue resorption and soft tissue deficiencies and improving the aesthetic outcome of immediate implant restorations. To address the potential health and aesthetic problems associated with soft and hard tissue deficiencies around dental implants, bone grafting in the jumping gap and soft tissue grafting procedures are often performed. According to literature, autologous soft tissue grafts have shown the best clinical and histological results in soft tissue regeneration techniques. However, it requires removal of tissue from the patient's donor area, which can add additional trauma. In contrast, gelatin sponges, currently commonly used as wound closure materials, are only hemostatic and rapidly absorbed postoperatively, and do not provide protection of hard and soft tissue augmentation. Collagen matrix has recently been introduced for keratinized gingival augmentation and has shown encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies, but more information is needed to confirm its clinical efficacy. Mucograft® Seal is a porcine collagen matrix with a bilayer structure, a dense and slowly absorbing layer and a spongy layer that stabilizes blood clots and allows soft tissue cells to penetrate. Human gingival fibroblasts cultured on Mucograft® were demonstrated to have good proliferative properties and cell viability as scaffold material. In dog extraction sites, preliminary results suggest that the combination of Mucograft® and Bio-Oss Collagen may be an effective method for alveolar ridge preservation. Mucograft® Seal can be used in combination with Bio-Oss Collagen® for alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction. The research hypothesis is that the use of a collagen matrix to seal the wound in immediate implant placement in aesthetic area will reduce buccal bone resorption and increase the width and thickness of the soft tissue at the implant site. Therefore, we designed this comparative clinical trial in which patients accept immediate implant placement in aesthetic area. The implant is placed after tooth extraction, and bone graft material Bio-Oss Collagen® is placed in the jump gap, and the wound was closed by different means (collagen matrix or gelatin sponge randomly). The clinical examination, CBCT imaging and histological evaluations were performed to compare the differences in clinical efficacy of the two wound closure methods. The primary outcome is the buccal bone thickness change at the immediate implant site 4 months after surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04827693 Completed - Periodontitis Clinical Trials

The Cortical Shield for Facial Bone Reconstruction

Start date: January 3, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

To evaluate a novel technique of bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement in severely damaged sockets.

NCT ID: NCT04685161 Recruiting - Fractured Tooth Clinical Trials

Comparison of Surgical Extrusion vs. Fibre Post Restoration for Crown-root Fractured Maxillary Incisors.

Start date: January 15, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A total of 124 samples was calculated to be sufficient with G*power software ver 3.1.9.2 with effect size of 0.4 alpha probability error and power 0.95.With drop out estimate of 10% the final sample size decided was 140 samples. Patients reporting with complicated(pulp exposed or pulpally involved) horizontal crown root fracture with loss of crown structure in maxillary incisors and radiograph evidence of supra alveolar tooth structure are recruited for study. Informed consent from the patients or guardian as appropriate is obtained as suitable prior to treatment delivery. Exclusion criteria were:patients not willing for recall visits, root with evidence of cervical resorption or roor canal filling, open apices, patient with systemic ailments rendering root canal treatment, compromised periodontal health, vertical or horizontal root fracture. Pulpal condition of tooth was assessed using cold sensibility test(Neosnow, orikam health care Ltd, India.) amd confirmed upon access opening with teeth showing evidence of pulpal bleeding wad categorized as irreversible pulpitis and teeth with no evidence of pulpal bleeding categorized as necrotic pulp.

NCT ID: NCT04604301 Active, not recruiting - Fractured Tooth Clinical Trials

Celtra Quatro Crown Study

Start date: September 24, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This investigation will be a clinical trial to study the performance of a newly developed high strength ceramic material for crowns. The ceramic has been approved by the FDA for patient treatment. A computer technique will be used to fabricate the crowns in a single appointment without the need for a temporary crown or second appointment. Two adhesive resin cement techniques will be used to hold the crown to the tooth and they will be evaluated for creating sensitivity to the tooth. The purpose of the study is to measure how well the high strength crowns function over an extended period of time.

NCT ID: NCT04563624 Not yet recruiting - Teeth Restoration Clinical Trials

Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up

Start date: October 1, 2020
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the study is to compare one-year clinical performance of indirect restoration fabricated from nano hybrid composite CAD CAM blocks and ceramic blocks

NCT ID: NCT04437797 Not yet recruiting - Broken Teeth Clinical Trials

Soft Tissue Outcomes of Badly Broken-down Teeth Treated With Surgical Extrusion Compared With Immediate Implant Placement

Start date: September 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Many patients suffer from badly decayed anterior teeth mostly in young age, causing esthetics and functional issues. This may be due to more than cause as fights, contact sports, accidents and falls. However; implant placement might not be the treatment of choice in some situations such as: medically compromised patients with absolute contraindications for implant placement or requiring extensive augmentation procedures, growing patients, patients with financial limitations, in addition to patients living in rural areas with no access for CBCT machines. Moreover, clinicians must be aware of cost-to-benefit ratios when attempting to recommend a specific treatment modality, especially in patients having financial limitations. Regarding the aforementioned conditions, surgical extrusion might be considered a cost-effective 'often overlooked' alternative compared to immediate single-tooth implant placement. Regarding healing time, cost, soft and hard tissue outcomes, surgical extrusion may be a good alternative yielding better soft tissue results as we preserve the natural tooth with the whole periodontium.