View clinical trials related to Thromboembolism.
Filter by:Pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently suspected in emergency departments (ED) patients which often leads to the prescription of DDimer testing and irradiative chest imaging (Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiogram CTPA in most cases).[1] Indeed, an increased use of CTPA has been reported without clear benefit in terms of prognosis.This increased use is reportedly associated with potential overdiagnosis of PE, increased cost, length of ED stay, and side effects from both chest imaging and undue anticoagulant treatments. The standard diagnostic strategy for PE work up includes three steps with an initial evaluation of clinical probability, followed by D-dimer testing if indicated, followed by chest imaging if necessary - Computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram CTPA being the imaging modality of choice. A large European prospective study has reported that the use of CTPA has constantly increased without change in the diagnostic yield. In order to reduce the use of CTPA, it has been validated that in patients with a low likelihood of PE, the D-dimer threshold for ordering CTPA can be raised at 1000 ng/ml. It has been validated that a low likelihood of PE can be determined either with the YEARS or the PEGeD clinical decision rules. These latter two include one common item being "Is PE the most likely diagnosis". A retrospective cohort study of 3330 patients reported that using this sole question of "Is PE the most likely diagnosis" can be safely used to raise the D-dimer threshold to 1000 ng/ml, and that this performs as well as YEARS and PEGeD. This simple question is easier to use by emergency physicians compared to complex ones, which are reportedly seldom used by emergency physicians. Therefore, the validation of the "PE unlikely" simple and straightforward decision rule could increase physicians' adherence and therefore limit the use of chest imaging. The hypothesis of this prospective study is that the likelihood of PE assessed to elevate the DDimer threshold to 1000 ng/ml can be estimated by the sole question of "is PE the most likely diagnosis", and to validate a global simplified diagnostic strategy for PE in the ED. The intervention will be the patient's management with a simplified global strategy. Whether PE is the most likely diagnostic will be assessed by the unstructured implicit clinician's estimation. In patient with a clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism: DDimer testing will be performed. If the likelihood of PE is low (PE is not the most likely diagnosis), then threshold for DDimer testing will be 1000 ng/ml. If the likelihood of PE is high (PE is the most likely diagnosis), then the age-adjusted DDimer threshold will be applied.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Cleaner™ Pro Thrombectomy System for aspiration thrombectomy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
This study was to compare the study drug KN060 to enoxaparin, for the prevention of blood clotting and safety in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Pregnancy is a major risk factor of thromboembolic disease (2 to 10 increased risk of thromboembolic event for pregnant women). This risk is related to the physiological changes inducing venous stasis and hypercoagulability. Thromboembolic disease is the first preventable cause of death during pregnancy (in France 1.1 maternal death per 100 000 living births. The recommended treatment for pregnant women is low molecular weight heparin requiring subcutaneous injections daily. Vitamin K antagonists are contraindicated due to a teratogenic risk. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are easier to use. Currently available preclinical and incidental exposure data on DOAC in pregnant women are very limited and insufficient to conclude on their safety. Therefore, its use during pregnancy is currently contraindicated for the grounds of precaution. The use of reimbursement data from the Système National des données de santé (National Health Data System) would provide more information on accidental exposure to DOACs during pregnancy, thanks to its completeness. The primary objective of SACOD is to compare the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women treated with a direct oral anticoagulant versus pregnant women treated with heparin and Vitamin K antagonist. The secondary objectives of the SACOD study are to i) determine the frequency of patients exposed to a direct oral anticoagulant during pregnancy according to pregnancy, ii) measure the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women initiating treatment with a direct oral anticoagulant therapy, iii) compare the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women initiating treatment with direct oral anticoagulants compared with pregnant women treated with heparin and a vitamin K antagonist, iv) compare the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with Antiphospholipid syndrome treated with a direct oral anticoagulant versus pregnant women treated with heparin and anti-vitamin K, v) measure the incidence of thrombo-embolic episodes during pregnancy under anticoagulant treatment.
This study is a prospective, multicenter international trial aimed at assessing the actual incidence, identifying associated factors, and evaluating the clinical consequences of both persistent and recurrent device-related thrombus (DRT) following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). While LAAO has shown efficacy in reducing the risk of stroke, device-related thrombus (DRT) remains a significant concern. The reported incidence of DRT varies, and it is associated with an elevated risk of ischemic stroke and death. The study highlights that persistent and recurrent DRT pose higher risks of thromboembolic events, and current data come from retrospective studies with non-standardized imaging follow-up protocols. The timing of imaging follow-up is crucial, and the study notes discrepancies in recommendations from expert statements. The EHRA/EAPCI suggests imaging at specific intervals post-procedure, while the SCAI/HRS recommends repeat imaging at shorter intervals to assess DRT resolution. The study underscores the need for dedicated prospective data to accurately determine the incidence, factors, and clinical impact of persistent and recurrent DRT after LAAO.
This study is a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted at 20 centers. Data of existing inpatients in 20 community hospitals were collected. Information collected included demographic, co-morbidities, co-medication, laboratory tests, imaging tests, and anticoagulant use. Based on Caprini, Padua, Khorana and PAPT rating tables, VTE risk assessment was carried out for inpatients from 20 community hospitals, and VTE risk stratification of patients and prevention of high-risk VTE patients were analyzed. Blood samples of inpatients were collected to determine coagulation function indicators. VTE screening was performed on hospitalized patients using color Doppler ultrasound to determine the incidence of VTE in community hospitalized patients. On this basis, the predictive efficacy of different VTE risk scores on community hospitalized patients was compared, and a new VTE risk score conforming to community hospitalized patients was constructed.
Individuals attending the hospital to undergo operations are at risk of developing blood clots in the legs, known as deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A clot in the leg can cause swelling, pain, and other long-term problems. If a clot in the leg breaks off and travels to the lungs, it can cause problems with the lungs' ability to move oxygen from the air into the blood and may be life-threatening. This is known as pulmonary embolism (PE). DVT and PE are known collectively as venous thromboembolism or VTE. The importance of preventing VTE in surgical patients is widely recognised, with two main strategies used: thinning the blood with regular injections and/or tablets and wearing elastic stockings to help stop blood from sitting in the leg veins where it can clot. Evidence for using elastic stockings to prevent VTE has recently been challenged. Additionally, there is a lack of evidence for the additional benefit of stockings over and above that of blood thinning medications. If stockings were to reduce VTE over and above blood thinning medication, these benefits need to be weighed against the risks and disadvantages of stockings, including discomfort, restricting blood flow to the leg causing blisters and wounds in addition to the cost. If stockings were found not to reduce the risk of clots, they would no longer need to be used in these patients, thus reducing the disadvantages of stockings, and saving the NHS millions of pounds per year. Certain types of operations (300,000 per year in the UK) are linked with a particularly high risk of VTE, including cancer surgery, surgery in the abdomen and pelvis, and bone (orthopaedic) surgery. In these cases, patients are offered blood thinning medications both during their hospital stay and for a period after they have left the hospital. Furthermore, these patients are offered stockings to wear while in the hospital. It is not known if, in patients who receive blood thinning medications both in hospital and after discharge, the addition of wearing stockings whilst in hospital reduces their risk of VTE any further. The purpose of this study is to investigate if it is worthwhile using stockings, in addition to blood thinning medication, to reduce blood clots after surgery. People enrolled in the study will be those at the highest risk of VTE and require an extended period of medication to reduce the risk of a blood clot. A computer will randomly choose one of the below treatments by chance to make the trial fair: A) Extended duration clot-reducing medicine in addition to stockings B) Extended duration clot-reducing medicine alone The surgery and all the other medical care will continue as normal. Everyone in the study will get an ultrasound scan at 21 - 35 days after their operation to check if they have developed a blood clot. This is an additional scan, not routinely performed in the NHS, to make sure that all blood clots are detected at an early stage. Participants will receive a phone call at 7, 21-35 and 90 days after their treatment to see if they have developed a blood clot or had any problems with the treatment.
The purpose of this research is to learn more about how what the Apple watch measures, in terms of walking data, heart rate, breathing rate, and sleep habits, relates to how participants feel. During the course of the treatment, the symptoms participants experience change, and whether the Apple watch can detect these changes. Ultimately, this knowledge is being used to design proactive tools and signatures that can predict complications or symptom changes before they happen.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of randomizing individuals to low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) or no treatment following cesarean delivery. The investigators hypothesize that among eligible individuals, at least 35% will enroll, undergo randomization, and complete the allocated treatment group.
The thromboembolic disease is a common complication of patients admitted to conventional hospitalization units. To prevent such complications, thromboprophylaxis is indicated in high-risk patients identified with validated risk-assessment models such as Padua score and IMPROVE-VTE score. However, the relation between thromboembolic disease and inpatients is yet to be demonstrated in new clinical settings such as at home hospitalization units. Moreover, patient immobilization is key in the pathogenesis of thromboembolic complications: therefore, it is crucial to collect raw data of patient mobility during admission. The goal of this observational study is to compare the thromboembolic risk of patients admitted with acute medical diseases to at home hospitalization units with conventional hospitalization units. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the estimated thromboembolic risk of patients admitted with acute medical diseases to at home hospitalization units similar to those admitted to conventional hospitalization units? - Are the risk-assessment models used to predict thromboembolic risk of patients admitted with acute medical diseases to conventional hospitalization units (Padua and IMPROVE-VTE score) valid in at home hospitalization patients? Participants admitted with acute medical diseases to either a conventional hospitalization unit or at home hospitalization units will be included in a prospective registry in order to investigate the 90 days incidence of thromboembolic disease. A cohort of such patients will be controlled with triaxial accelerometer in order to collect raw data regarding patient mobility during admission.