Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Traditional Loss-of-resistance Technique vs Compuflo-aided Technology for Placement of a Thoracic Epidural Catheter: a Randomized Trial of the Effect on the Success Rate
NCT number | NCT03826186 |
Other study ID # | 201812716 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 26, 2019 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2022 |
Verified date | August 2022 |
Source | University of Iowa |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Traditionally, loss-of-resistance (LOR) to air or saline with a special ground-glass syringe is the technique used to identify epidural space, but failure rates up to 30% have been reported using this technique for thoracic epidural placement. This failure rate has sparked the search for newer techniques to improve the success rate for placement.The CompuFlo epidural system is a device that provides anesthesiologists and other healthcare providers the ability to quantitatively determine and document the pressure at the needle tip in real time. The device's proprietary dynamic pressure sensing technology (DPS) allows it to provide objective visual and audible in-tissue pressure feedback that allows anesthesiologists to identify the epidural space. The purpose this research study is to compare the success rate of the two different approaches (traditional method v/s CompuFlo assisted) to thoracic epidural placement.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 120 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | January 1, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age: 18 to 70 - BMI: 18 to 50 kg/m2 - Require pain control for major thoracic or abdominal surgeries - Require pain control for rib fractures - English is the subject's first language - Must be able to signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Age: Less than 18 and older than 70 - Must be free of significant valvular heart disease - Pregnant women - Prisoners - Contraindication to thoracic epidural anesthesia - Allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics - Unable to provide written informed consent |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
YATISH SIDDAPURA RANGANATH |
United States,
Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. Review. — View Citation
Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K, Schricker T, Trudel J, Belliveau P. Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2002 Sep;97(3):540-9. — View Citation
Gong Y, Shi H, Wu J, Labu D, Sun J, Zhong H, Li L, Xin X, Wang L, Wu L, Ma D. Pressure waveform-guided epidural catheter placement in comparison to the loss-of-resistance conventional method. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Aug;26(5):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane. — View Citation
Leurcharusmee P, Arnuntasupakul V, Chora De La Garza D, Vijitpavan A, Ah-Kye S, Saelao A, Tiyaprasertkul W, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Reliability of Waveform Analysis as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 — View Citation
Parra MC, Washburn K, Brown JR, Beach ML, Yeager MP, Barr P, Bonham K, Lamb K, Loftus RW. Fluoroscopic Guidance Increases the Incidence of Thoracic Epidural Catheter Placement Within the Epidural Space: A Randomized Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Fe — View Citation
Pöpping DM, Elia N, Marret E, Remy C, Tramèr MR. Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):990-9; discussion 1000. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.99 — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Successful Thoracic Epidural Catheter Placement | Successful placement of thoracic epidural analgesia will be determined by the loss of cold sensation on the chest or abdomen depending on the site of epidural placement using a dermatome bilaterally. Subjects will be tested at 10 minute intervals. | Maximum 20 minutes post administration of epidural test dose | |
Secondary | Amount of Time Required to Complete the Procedure | Tuohy needle skin puncture to removal of tuohy (for the last time) from the patient | During procedure, assessed up to 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Reported Loss of Cold Sensation at Various Time Points | Record the time it takes for loss of cold sensation on the chest or abdomen depending on the site of epidural placement using a dermatome bilaterally. Subjects will be tested at 10 minute intervals. | Up to 20 minutes post administration of epidural test dose | |
Secondary | Mean Arterial Pressure at Baseline and 20 Minutes Post Procedure | Blood pressure was measured at baseline (patient check-in) and then every 5 minutes after administration of test dose in both groups. To observe the trend in blood pressure changes, the mean arterial pressure was used. Results are reported as mean arterial pressure (MAP) since MAP is the average arterial pressure throughout one cardiac cycle, systole and diastole. The MAP was calculated based on the available MAP formula (MAP=diastolic blood pressure (DBP) + 1/3 [systolic blood pressure (SBP) - DBP]). | Up to 20 minutes post administration of epidural test dose | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Systolic Blood Pressure | A fall in systolic blood pressure by 20% or more from the baseline up to 20 minutes after the initial test dose was considered a significant change. | Up to 20 minutes post administration of epidural test dose | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Whose Provider Answered "Yes" or "No" to Ease of Catheter Placement | The provider was asked to evaluate the ease of catheter threading through the needle after the loss of resistance. This is a "yes" or "no" evaluation asked and answered at the end of the procedure. The question asked was "Was the catheter placement (threading) smooth after loss of resistance?" | During procedure, assessed up to 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With a Positive Meniscus Test | The test involves 3 steps after removal of the filter: (i) the open end of the epidural catheter is lifted and the liquid meniscus present in the catheter is observed to drop rapidly; (ii) the open end of the epidural catheter is lowered and the liquid meniscus is again observed to fill the catheter with clear liquid and no blood; (iii) the presence of air in the catheter during backflow confirms the correct position in the epidural space relative to a position in the subarachnoid space. If the above changes are observed - that would help in secondary confirmation of the epidural space and we would call that a positive test. If the above changes are not observed, it was called as a negative test. | During procedure, assessed up to 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Unintentional Dural Puncture | The number of unintentional dural punctures during the traditional loss-of-resistance methods will be compared to the unintentional dural punctures while using the CompuFlo assisted technology. | During procedure, assessed up to 15 minutes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02000973 -
Effects of Epidural Local Anesthetics on Propofol Induction
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06068166 -
Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Reduces Mortality and Rehospitalization for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02135016 -
The Effect of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia With Different Block Level on Propofol Induction
|
Phase 4 |