Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This trial compares the accuracy provided by plain film as well as ultra-low-dose-computed-tomography (ULDCT) of the chest. It also aims to analyze differences in diagnostic confidence and therapeutic consequence offered by these two imaging modalities.


Clinical Trial Description

For nearly a century, chest X-ray (plain film, projectional radiography) has been the established primary imaging modality for patients with acute chest pain, suspected pneumonia, and / or acute dyspnoea in the diagnostic pathway of emergency departments, although the sensitivity and specificity of this X-ray technique are moderate.

The widespread availability and use of chest X-ray is due to the low acquisition and operating costs for projectional radiography equipment, the short examination time, and the very low radiation exposure. In addition, projectional radiography of the chest often serves as a guide for further, more sensitive, diagnostical procedures. However, these advantages are partially offset by the disadvantages inherent to projectional methods: anatomical structures may superpose or mask pathological structures. As a result, some areas of the lung may be obscured, and assessment may therefore be limited.

Whereas computed tomography was reserved for certain clinical questions over the last few decades, and, in most cases, served as a second imaging approach after plain film radiography, it has increasingly evolved as a primary imaging modality for several indications (e.g., suspicion of pulmonary embolism, highly suspected aortic dissection). This rise of computed tomography was due not only to its significant advantage of no superposition, but also partly driven by the marked reduction in radiation dose needed without sacrificing image quality. This was driven by the development of new detectors, modulation of tube current and voltage, as well as iterative reconstruction techniques. As a result, recent computed tomography scanners currently offer not only a more precise visualization of differences in tissue-attenuation and the significant advantage of the absence of artefacts due to superposition, but also allow for imaging with a considerably reduced radiation dosage compared to older scanners. Therefore, computed tomography may now be utilized as screening method in specific indications that carry an increased risk of certain pathologies (e.g., in long-time smokers). The introduction of the latest generation of computed tomography devices about three years ago allowed for an even further reduction in dose by filtering out low-energy photons using a tin filter, which offers the possibility of a reduction in radiation dose by another 50 % or more for established CT indications. For specific indications (e.g., lung nodules in follow-up), the radiation dose may even be reduced to a tenth or one-hundredth of a standard-dose CT (SDCT).

The current reference dose-length-product (DLP) in Germany for thoracic standard-dose CT (SDCT) is ~350 mGycm (effective dose ~6 mSv) and, for thoracic low-dose-CT (LDCT / HR-CT), ~100 mGycm (effective dose ~1.7 mSv). However, the latest devices (third-generation dual-energy CT) provide the opportunity to considerably reduce the reference dose of thoracic low-dose CT. In the current literature, these scans are referred to as Ultra-Low-Dose-CT (ULDCT) and are usually associated with a radiation dosage of 0.14 to 0.5 mSv. For this dose range, no standardized reference values have been published as yet.

The limiting factors of ULDCT are quantum noise, loss of spatial resolution, and other image artefacts. Therefore, careful selection of appropriate CT protocols and dosage is mandatory in order to achieve sufficient image quality to answer the respective diagnostic question.

Several papers have been published on the subject of ULDCT, which are dedicated to the comparison of ULDCT with LDCT and/or SDCT. These papers conclude that this technology may be used with sufficient sensitivity and specificity for indications such as dyspnea, emphysema, or lung nodules. Due to the potential to reduce the radiation dose to less than 1/30 of a standard-dose CT while still providing acceptable image quality with the latest generation of devices, ULDCT of the chest is emerging as an interesting alternative to conventional chest X-ray.

To the best of the authors' knowledge, there are currently no studies comparing and evaluating ultra-low-dose-CT as a primary imaging alternative to chest X-ray in emergency department patients.

This study aims to compare ULDCT and plain film of the chest with regard to their accuracy in an unfiltered patient cohort of an emergency department. For this purpose, the investigator's ULDCT protocol will use the lowest possible dose at which image quality is diagnostically sufficient (approximately 0.2 mSv effective dose). This corresponds to less than 1/30 of the radiation dose of a standard-dose CT of the chest and to only about 2.5 times the dose of a chest X-ray in two views. This dose is equal to less than a month of natural background radiation in Austria and less than the radiation exposure on an intercontinental flight.

In addition to the accuracy of ULDCT of the chest compared to plain film of the chest, this trial also aims to analyze the clinical relevance of both methods by assessing the respective impact on final diagnosis, as well as possible changes in therapy. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03922516
Study type Interventional
Source Medical University of Vienna
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date May 2, 2019
Completion date November 26, 2019

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05563701 - Evaluation of the LVivo Image Quality Scoring (IQS)
Completed NCT04908397 - Carnitine Consumption and Augmentation in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Phase 1
Terminated NCT03309358 - A Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Inhaled SNSP113 in Healthy Subjects and Subjects With Stable Cystic Fibrosis Phase 1
Completed NCT03682354 - ESPB Versus INB With PCIA in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03683186 - A Study Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ralinepag in Subjects With PAH Via an Open-Label Extension Phase 3
Completed NCT03626519 - Effects of Menthol on Dyspnoea in COPD Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT06004440 - Real World Registry for Use of the Ion Endoluminal System
Completed NCT04874948 - Absorption, Elimination and Safety of 14C-labeled Radioactive BTZ-043, a New Compound in TB Treatment Phase 1
Completed NCT02926768 - Phase I/II Study of CK-101 in NSCLC Patients and Other Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT01443845 - Roflumilast in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients Treated With Fixed Dose Combinations of Long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) and Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) Phase 4
Completed NCT00269256 - Stress, Environment, and Genetics in Urban Children With Asthma N/A
Completed NCT00281216 - Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Individuals Experiencing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations N/A
Terminated NCT00233207 - IC14 Antibodies to Treat Individuals With Acute Lung Injury Phase 2
Recruiting NCT00129350 - Assessment of Heart and Heart-Lung Transplant Patient Outcomes Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT00115297 - Montelukast for Early Life Wheezing Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00091767 - Genetic Studies in Difficult to Treat Asthma: TENOR N/A
Completed NCT00094276 - Intervention for Improving Asthma Care for Minority Children in Head Start N/A
Completed NCT00083798 - Family Linkage Study of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in Iceland N/A
Completed NCT00089752 - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Improve Milder Obstructive Sleep Apnea N/A
Completed NCT00233168 - Effectiveness of Public Health Model of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Control for High-Risk Adolescents N/A