View clinical trials related to Tension-Type Headache.
Filter by:The goal of this observational study is to assess the pain sensitivity in tension-type headache patients. The main question it aims to answer is: - Are signs of central sensitization present in tension-type headache? Participants will be asked to fill out baseline questionnaires and they will be assessed during 1 test moment (static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing). Researchers will compare tension-type headache patients with healthy controls to see if signs of central sensitization are only present in the tension-type headache group.
This randomized open-label prospective study focus on headache patients initiating preventive treatment, where the treating physician identifies a need for follow-up visits in specialized healthcare. The study will clarify whether the implementation (compliance) and overall satisfaction of the patient are better with follow-up by a headache nurse compared to standard follow-up. Patients with signed written consent will be randomised to either group a: Telephone calls from nurse after two and 6 week or B. Patient-initiated follow-up by their general practitioner.
The primary aim of this research is to objectively assess the impact of virtual reality (VR) technology on pain symptoms in tension-type headache patients. This study is designed to understand the potential of VR in the treatment of tension-type headaches, exploring its ability to reduce pain severity and improve patients' quality of life.
Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial in which the treatment will be administered through 3 sessions of dry needling in the cervical, cranial, and facial musculature in patients with frequent and chronic tension-type headache.
This project comprises two studies; a cross-sectional study and a randomized controlled trial. 1. The goal of the cross-sectional study is to compare multiple outcome parameters in different headache types: tension type (TTH), cervicogenic (CGH) and myofascial headache (MFH) as drafted by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD). Not only will these types be compared against each other, they will also be compared to healthy controls (HC). The main research questions are: - Are the criteria drafted by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) discriminative for MFH? - Are there differences between the headache types (and healthy controls) in pain & disability scores, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, muscle elasticity and hyperalgesia (=pain pressure treshold, PPT)? Participants will : - Fill out questionnaires about their pain and disability; - Be clinically investigated by a physiotherapist (anamnesis, inspection, examination of movement and structures of the neck and head); - Undergo a testing battery including neck ROM, neck muscle strength & elasticity and PPT measurement of the C2 processus spinosus, the bilateral upper trapezius muscle and the tibialis anterior muscle of the dominant leg. 2. The goal of this randomized controlled study is to investigate the additional effect of dry needling in the treatment of MFH patients, as compared to a treatment consisting of manual techniques only. The main question it aims to answer is: - Does manual therapy combined with dry needling provide an additional effect on pain, disability and functional outcomes in MFH patients, as compared to manual therapy alone? After the baseline test (see part 1), participants with MFH will be randomly divided to receive 4 sessions over 4 weeks of MT or MT + DN. Hereafter, the baseline test is repeated at 1 week and 3 months post-treatment.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of PRT on pain characteristics, attack frequency, activity self-efficacy perception, and social participation in women with two different types of headaches, TTH and migraine. Methods: A total of 58 women within the age range of 20 to 45 were screened for eligibility in terms of suitability for participation in the study. Two separate progressive relaxation training sessions were administered to two distinct groups: one comprised of women with TTH and the other consisting of women with migraine. Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted for both groups as follows. Both intervention groups were instructed and trained by a physiotherapist 2times a week for 30 minutes each over 6 weeks,
Tension-type headache is a headache that starts from the cervical and suboccipital regions, spreads from the back of the head to the parietal, frontal and temporal regions, and is felt in the form of compression, pressure and heaviness. Increased muscle and fascia tone in the cervical and cranial region, together with active trigger points and factors that trigger pain, cause tension-type headache. Head and neck fascia serves as an important proprioceptive structure in our body. Abnormal inputs from mechanoreceptors and structures around the joint cause deterioration in joint position sense. This study was planned to investigate the effects of the new facial distortion model on pain intensity, cervical posture and joint position sense, unlike the manual techniques used in previous studies in tension-type headache.
The goal of this study is to learn more about the Headache Screening Questionnaire in people with Headache. The main question is: Does the lower limit of a 95% confidence interval of the HSQ in physiotherapy during a period of 2 to 4 weeks reach at least 0.4?
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effect of vitamin D in patients with prophylactic therapy for episodic and chronic tension-type headache in amitriptyline or topiramate treatment. The main question it aims to answer are: • What is the effect of vitamin D in patients with prophylactic therapy for episodic and chronic tension-type headache? Patients will have the next selection criteria: - Patients diagnosed by a neurologist in the headache clinic - Criteria for episodic and chronic tension-type headache - Poor clinical response to prophylactic treatment (amitriptyline, topiramate) - Use of at least 1 prophylactic medication or a history of having used them. - Onset of disease between the ages of 18 and 60 - Signature of informed consent The population will be randomly divided into the following 3 treatment groups: - Participants amitriptyline or topiramate treatment. - Patients with placebo (Calcium) + topiramate/amitriptyline, - Participants with vitamin D3/calcium+topiramate/amitriptyline. Researchers will compare the groups to see if vitamin D can decrease the intensity of your headache and therefore have a new therapeutic option.
Sonodyn is an investigational device that within this clinical investigation is intended for use in patients suffering from low back pain, tension headache or neck pain, originating from therapy-resistant myofascial pain syndrome. Myofascial pain syndrome is a prevalent pain condition in the adult population and a common cause of pain and dysfunction in the musculoskeletal system. It is a trigger point-induced regional musculoskeletal pain disorder affecting one or more muscles or groups of muscles. Sonodyn is a handheld medical device that combines low-energy ultrasound, electrical and magnetic field stimulation for non-invasive transcutaneous treatment of chronic myofascial pain syndrome. Sonodyn is a battery-operated, rechargeable stimulation device to be placed over specific trigger points for associated pain patterns in the human body. It emits ultrasound, electrical and magnetic stimulation signals with a pre-defined set of parameters for each of the independently operated power sources. The study will follow a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind parallel group design. It will be conducted as a multi-center investigation at 6 sites in Austria and Switzerland. Patients are randomized in a 2:1 ratio into Treatment and Control. - Active Sonodyn therapy (Treatment) - No therapy (Sham Control) Two types of Sonodyn devices will be used: a fully functional one for Therapy arm patients that can deliver stimulation, and a non-functional one for Control arm patients that cannot convey any energy signals to the device output. The devices will look fully identical. Randomization will be stratified by study site, pain diagnosis and sex of the patient. For each subject, after a screening phase of 1 week, patients will be treated for 3 weeks with a follow-up of additional 8 weeks, adding up to 12 weeks. During treatment patients will activate their device 3 times a day for 10 minutes each. During screening, treatment and follow-up period, all patients will twice per day report the average and maximum intensity of their pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patients will also enter the date, amount, and time of intake of rescue medication, if applicable. The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact on pain. Secondary objectives are to compare the performance between active therapy and sham, as well as to correlate changes in pain intensity with other pain related scales.