Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Clinical Trial
— ENLIVENOfficial title:
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study of Orally Administered PLX3397 in Subjects With Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath
Verified date | April 2022 |
Source | Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a Phase 3 clinical study, which aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an investigational drug called pexidartinib for the treatment of certain tumors for which surgical removal could cause more harm than good. The main purpose of this study is to gather information about the investigational drug pexidartinib, which may help to treat tumors of pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) or giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (GCT-TS). The study consists of two parts with a follow-up period. In Part 1, eligible study participants will be assigned to receive either pexidartinib or matching placebo for 24 weeks. A number of assessments will be carried out during the course of the study, including physical examinations, blood tests, imaging studies, electrocardiograms, and questionnaires. MRI scans will be used to evaluate the response of the tumors to the treatment. Some subjects, assigned to placebo in Part 1 transitioned to pexidartinib for Part 2. Then a protocol amendment was written to allow only pexidartinib patients to continue into Part 2. Part 2 is a long-term treatment phase in which all participants receive open-label pexidartinib. There was also a follow-up period added to Part 2.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 120 |
Est. completion date | April 30, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | March 27, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria 1. Age = 18 years. 2. A diagnosis of PVNS or GCT-TS (i) that has been histologically confirmed either by a pathologist at the treating institution or a central pathologist, and (ii) where surgical resection would be associated with potentially worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity (locally advanced disease), with morbidity determined consensually by qualified personnel (eg, two surgeons or a multi-disciplinary tumor board). 3. Measurable disease of at least 2 cm and otherwise based on RECIST 1.1, assessed from MRI scans by a central radiologist. 4. Symptomatic disease because of active PVNS or GCT-TS, defined as one or more of the following: 1. a worst pain of at least 4 at any time during the week preceding the Screening Visit (based on scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing "pain as bad as you can imagine"). 2. a worst stiffness of at least 4 at any time during the week preceding the Screening Visit (based on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing "stiffness as bad as you can imagine"). 5. Stable prescription of analgesic regimen during the 2 weeks prior to randomization. 6. During the 2 weeks prior to randomization, at least 4 of 7 consecutive days of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) items and Worst Stiffness NRS items completed correctly. 7. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within the 14-day period prior to randomization. (Where demanded by local regulations, this test may be required within 72 hours of randomization.) 8. Males and females of childbearing potential are permitted in the study so long as they consent to avoid getting their partner pregnant or becoming pregnant, respectively, by using a highly effective contraception method, as described below, throughout the study and for up to 90 days after completion. Highly effective methods of contraception include: intra-uterine device (non-hormonal or hormonal), bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomy, sexual abstinence, or barrier methods (eg, condom, diaphragm) used in combination with hormonal methods associated with inhibition of ovulation. Women of non-childbearing potential may be included if they are either surgically sterile or have been postmenopausal for = 1 year. Women who have documentation of at least 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea and have a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level > 40 milli-International units (mIU/mL) will be considered postmenopausal. 9. Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function, defined by: - Absolute neutrophil count = 1.5 × 10^9/L - aspartate aminotransferase/alanine (AST/ALT) = 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) - Hemoglobin > 10 g/dL - Total bilirubin = 1.5 × ULN - Platelet count = 100 × 10^9/L - Serum creatinine = 1.5 × ULN 10. Willingness and ability to complete the Worst Pain NRS item, Worst Stiffness NRS item, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale, and other self-assessment instruments throughout the study. 11. Willingness and ability to use an electronic diary. 12. Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures and to comply with all study requirements. Exclusion Criteria 1. Investigational drug use within 28 days of randomization. 2. Previous use of pexidartinib or any biologic treatment targeting CSF-1 or the CSF-1R; previous use of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors, eg, imatinib or nilotinib, are allowed. 3. Active cancer (either concurrent or within the last year of starting study treatment) that requires therapy (eg, surgical, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy), with the exception of adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, melanoma in-situ, carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or breast, or prostate carcinoma with a prostate-specific antigen value <0.2 ng/mL. 4. Known metastatic PVNS/GCT-TS. 5. Active or chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus or known active or chronic infection with human immunodeficiency virus. 6. Known active tuberculosis. 7. Significant concomitant arthropathy in the affected joint, serious illness, uncontrolled infection, or a medical or psychiatric history that, in the Investigator's opinion, would likely interfere with the person's study participation or the interpretation of his or her results. 8. Women who are breastfeeding. 9. A screening Fridericia corrected QT interval (QTcF) = 450 ms (men) or = 470 ms (women). 10. MRI contraindications. 11. History of hypersensitivity to any excipients in the investigational product. 12. Inability to swallow capsules. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre | East Melbourne | Victoria |
Australia | Chris O'Brien Lifehouse | Sydney | New South Wales |
Australia | Princess Alexandra Hospital | Woolloongabba | Queensland |
Canada | McGill University Health Centre | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | Princess Margaret Hospital | Toronto | Ontario |
Denmark | Herlev Hospital | Herlev | |
France | Centre Leon Bérard | Lyon | |
France | Institut Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | |
Germany | HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch | Berlin | |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Essen | Essen | |
Hungary | Military Hospital-State Health Center | Budapest | |
Italy | Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli | Bologna | BO |
Italy | Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Fondazione IRCCS | Milano | MI |
Netherlands | Leiden University Medical Center | Leiden | |
Netherlands | Radboud Univ. Medical Center | Nijmegen | |
Poland | Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie | Warszawa | |
Spain | Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío | Sevilla | |
United Kingdom | The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust | London | |
United Kingdom | University College Hospital | London | |
United States | Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | : Dana Farber Cancer Institute | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper | Camden | New Jersey |
United States | Duke Cancer Center | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Mayo Clinic Cancer Center | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center | Miami | Florida |
United States | Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | New York | New York |
United States | Stanford Cancer Center | Palo Alto | California |
United States | OHSU Knight Cancer Institute | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Mayo Clinic Cancer Center | Rochester | Minnesota |
United States | Washington University School of Medicine | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Huntsman Cancer Institute | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | UCLA Medical Center | Santa Monica | California |
United States | Mayo Clinic | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | Seattle Cancer Care Alliance | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Moffitt Cancer Center | Tampa | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. |
United States, Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49 | Complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference. | By Week 49 | |
Other | Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49 | Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses. | By Week 49 | |
Other | Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49 | The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes. | By Week 49 | |
Other | Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49 | The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine). | Baseline, Week 25, and Week 49 | |
Other | Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49 | The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). | By Week 49 | |
Other | Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49 | Best overall response (CR or PR) was assessed using tumor volume score (TVS) in the ITT population. Tumor Volume Score is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. | By Week 49 | |
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25 | Complete response (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference. | Week 25 | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25 | Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses. | Baseline, Week 13, and Week 25 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25 | Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were assessed using tumor volume score (TVS). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference. TVS is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. | Week 25 | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25 | The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes. | at Week 9 , Week 17, and Week 25 | |
Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25 | The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine). | Baseline, Week 9, Week 17, and Week 25 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25 | The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). | Week 25 | |
Secondary | Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression | Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined as the date of the first recorded response to the first date of documented disease progression. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed. | By Week 96 | |
Secondary | Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume Score | Tumor Volume Score (TVS) is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed. | By Week 120 | |
Secondary | Duration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1 | Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression. | Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months) | |
Secondary | Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) | Duration of response (DOR) based on TVS is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression. | Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (=10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred Term | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events that started or worsened after the first dose of treatment and within 28 days after the last dose. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade adverse events. Any Grade and Grade =3 (severe) TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were coded using MedDRA version 17.1. | After the first dose of treatment up to 28 days after the last dose |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04488822 -
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Pexidartinib in Adult Subjects With TGCT
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01207492 -
Nilotinib in Patients With Relapsed or Metastatic Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis/Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor/Diffuse-Type Giant Cell Tumor
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04938180 -
A Phase 2 Study of Intravenous AMB-05X in Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04526704 -
Study to Evaluate Discontinuation and Re-Treatment in Participants With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Previously Treated With Pexidartinib
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05059262 -
Study of Vimseltinib for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04731675 -
An Open-Label Study of Intra-articular AMB-05X Injections in Subjects With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor of the Knee
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04703322 -
A Study of Pexidartinib in Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor in Japan
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02471716 -
Study of Cabiralizumab in Patients With Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis / Diffuse Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04635111 -
A Long-term Study Evaluating Hepatotoxicity Associated With TURALIO™ (Pexidartinib) Treatment
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05349643 -
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of AMB-05X Injections in Subjects With TGCT
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04192344 -
A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK-021 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT02673736 -
A Study of PLX73086 in Advanced Solid Tumors and Locally Advanced or Refractory Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03069469 -
Study of Vimseltinib (DCC-3014) in Patients With Advanced Tumors and Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT01804530 -
Phase 1 Study of PLX7486 as Single Agent in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05804045 -
Study of Pimicotinib (ABSK021) for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (MANEUVER)
|
Phase 3 |