View clinical trials related to Tachycardia, Ventricular.
Filter by:Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a leading cause of death and suffering in the Veteran population. Currently, ablation procedures are performed to destroy the diseased tissue that causes this problem. This study will test to see if a new non-invasive targeting tool can help guide doctors during the procedure and improve the outcomes of the ablation procedure. Once this study is completed, the investigators will know whether this tool could help increase the efficacy, safety and accuracy of ablation therapy of fatal heart rhythms.
Data collection registry for patients with ventricular tachycardia to help physicians give better care for patients clinically and procedurally.
This is a multi-center, parallel-group, randomized, open-label trial evaluating the clinical outcome and efficacy of emergency catheter ablation versus conventional stepped-care strategies in patients with haemodynamically not-tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT).
The PMCF is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, controlled study of up to 130 patients designed to collect safety and performance data regarding the use of the Adagio VT Cryoablation System in the treatment of recurrent ventricular tachycardia.
Substrate-based DEEP mapping and activation mapping are two of the main techniques used for guiding ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. There is no data comparing directly the extent of applicability, procedural results, and the long-term outcomes between the two mapping strategies.This randomized clinical trial aims to test whether activation mapping is superior to DEEP mapping to reduce ventricular tachycardia recurrence. The primary endpoint of the study is to compare recurrence-free survival rate of ventricular tachycardia at 12 months and procedural feasibility of substrate-based DEEP mapping versus activation mapping for VT ablation.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with advanced structural heart disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the efficacy of SBRT compared to catheter ablation (CA) in achieving a ≥ 75% reduction in VT burden at 6 months - What is the comparable safety profile of SBRT vs CA Researchers will compare SBRT and CA (standard of care).
The goal of this clinical trial is to make clear that a new method, right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) posterior septum pacing, has a greater accuracy in predicting the origin of ventricular outflow tract (VOT) ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) compared to the previous electrocardiographic standards for the identification of the origin of ventricular outflow tract. The secondary aim is to investigate, by using the new method, if it can optimize the procedure of radiofrequency catheter ablation. Researches will break the method of this investigation into two steps: First step have enrolled 100 patients. This step would be used to compare the results predicted by right ventricular outflow tract posterior septum pacing, with the previously used electrocardiographic criteria and actual target site. The second step will enroll another 100 patients. In this step, patients will be divided into two groups, one being the new protocol group and the other being the convention group. Patients will also be followed up, for 1 month and 3 months at outpatient clinic post procedure. Procedure time, success rate, fluoroscopy exposure time and complications, are compared between RVOT posterior septum pacing group and convention group.
This is an exploratory research aiming to accurately identify the site of origin of tachyarrhythmia using Magnetocardiography (MCG), which will have guiding significance for early diagnosis, the formulation of treatment plans and preoperative positioning for radiofrequency ablation.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing permanent cardiac pacing and to compare procedural efficacy and safety of different implantation approaches in the clinical practice of the participating centres. The contribution of non-fluoroscopic anatomical and electrophysiological reconstruction systems to device implantation procedures will also be evaluated. Participants [patients over 18 years old with an indication to receive a definitive pacemaker/intracardiac defibrillator implant] will receive a permanent cardiac pacing implant as requested according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines; the investigators will evaluate procedural efficacy and safety of different implantation approaches.
This is a multicenter, interventional study. The study will enroll patients that fulfill the inclusion criteria over a 33-month period. Considering the small number of patients who will meet the study criteria, it is also possible to include retrospective patients who already underwent STAR (for instance, as part of a compassionate program) if they meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as the treatment planning standardized requirements and sign their consent to this trial. All patients prospectively enrolled will undergo a flow of investigations following a standardized approach. ICD programming will be standardized.