Clinical Trials Logo

Syndactyly clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Syndactyly.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06239064 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Cognitive Impairment

Early Genetic Identification of Obesity

WEGIO
Start date: January 24, 2024
Phase:
Study type: Observational

TITLE: Whole genetic approach in Early Genetic Identification of Obesity (WEGIO) DESIGN: Multicenter epidemiological study STUDY POPULATION: Participants at risk for a syndromic or a monogenic genetic obesity, incl. participants clinically diagnosed with Bardet-Biedl-Syndrome (BBS) NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 1000 for initial genetic sequencing and app. 40 for the follow-up documentation COORDINATING INVESTIGATOR: Prof. Dr. Arndt Rolfs

NCT ID: NCT04564430 Recruiting - Trigger Finger Clinical Trials

Clonidine for Tourniquet-related Pain in Children

CLOTCH
Start date: March 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study is designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, clinical trial with two parallel groups. This study investigates the association between a single dose of the drug, Clonidine, and the total amount of opioid administered under and 24 hours after surgery in children undergoing orthopedic limb surgery with the use of tourniquet. The investigators hypothesize that administration of clonidine to children undergoing limb surgery with the use of inflatable tourniquets would reduce post-procedural pain. This study is a pilot to obtain an effect size. Based on this the investigators will calculate a sample size for the main trial enabling us to reach a power of 0.8 with a significans level of 0.05.

NCT ID: NCT03434587 Completed - Metacarpal Fracture Clinical Trials

Syndactyly Versus Closed Reduction in 5th Metacarpal Neck Fracture

Start date: August 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to compare the functional results of two different therapeutic approaches in patients that present with a 5th metacarpal neck fracture. Patients will be randomly assigned to be treated with either syndactyly or closed reduction plus inmovilization.

NCT ID: NCT03107546 Completed - Syndactyly Clinical Trials

Comparison of Scar Formation in Syndactyly Release Surgery With Full Thickness Skin Graft Versus Skin Graft Substitute

Start date: May 11, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Syndactyly is the most common hand abnormality in children. During development, two or more fingers do not separate in the usual way and remain connected by skin. Surgery is needed to separate the fingers. Usually, it is performed between 6 months and 3 years of age, depending on the severity of the syndactyly. During the surgery, the fingers are separated; however, there isn't enough skin to completely cover the fingers once they are separated. There are two areas on the fingers that need to be covered after separation, and there is a standard method, and now a new technique to cover these areas. The standard current technique that surgeons use to cover the newly separated fingers is to apply a small section of the patient's own skin taken from a different area of their body (this is known as a skin graft). A new technique called Hyaluronic acid matrix (Hyalomatrix®) is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved, commercially available, skin graft substitute that is currently being used both in the US and in Europe. The Hyalomatrix (or skin graft substitute) is sutured into place using a stitch on each corner, over the areas left without skin covering during the surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness, wound healing, scar formation and potential associated complications of the current skin graft technique with the new technique called Hyalomatrix (or skin graft substitute) following surgery.

NCT ID: NCT02548260 Terminated - Finger Injuries Clinical Trials

Treatment of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries. Clinical Efficiency of Syndactyly Treatment and Digital Compression

Start date: March 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Proximal interphalangeal joint injuries of the fingers may be treated in various ways and no treatment has been shown to be superior. The investigators wish to study the effectiveness of syndactyly versus digital splint when comparing joint mobility. The investigators also wish to study the effectiveness of finger compression in reducing edema and therefore allowing a greater arc of motion.

NCT ID: NCT01416090 Completed - Clinical trials for Congenital Hand Deformities

Syndactyly Repair: Comparison of Skin Graft and No Skin Graft Techniques

Start date: July 2004
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Syndactyly is a relatively common congenital abnormality of the hand occurring approximately 1 out of 2500 live births (1). It can be simple, meaning only skin and soft tissues are shared, or complex, meaning the bone or nail parts are shared. In any case, it is a fact that there is not enough skin surrounding the two finger segment to be utilized to cover two separate fingers. This can also be proven by simple geometry. Therefore, it has always been taught to residents and explained to numerous patients' families that addition of skin graft is required for a proper syndactyly release. Without it, skin flaps would be too tight, causing some necrosis and significant scarring along the finger and particularly in the web space, causing an unsatisfactory functional and cosmetic result requiring revision.

NCT ID: NCT00961896 Completed - Clinical trials for Treatment for Basal Cell Carcinomas (BCCs) in Gorlin Syndrome Patients

A Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Local Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of LDE225 on Skin Basal Cell Carcinomas in Gorlin Syndrome Patients

Start date: July 2009
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Part I was a double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled Proof of Concept (PoC) study to evaluate the safety, local tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple topical administrations of LDE225 (a specific Smoothened inhibitor) on skin basal cell carcinomas in Gorlin's syndrome patients. Following a 21-day screening period, patients were exposed to multiple doses of topically applied LDE225 twice daily for 4 weeks in a double-blind manner. The patients returned weekly for visits where each BCC was clinically evaluated and digital photographs taken. Local safety and tolerability was also assessed. After the last application of treatment, biopsies were taken from treated (both vehicle and LDE225) BCCs (three per patient) for histology, biomarker evaluation and for pharmacokinetics (skin exposure). In addition, a biopsy from LDE225-treated uninvolved perilesional skin was taken for pharmacokinetic evaluation. In total, 4 biopsies were taken: 2 for histology and biomarker and 2 for PK. Part II of this study consisted of a 21-day screening period, a baseline period (directly before commencing the treatment period) and a treatment period of 6 or 9 weeks, depending on randomization. A clinical assessment was performed on site on the last treatment day and if a full clinical response had been observed, approximately 3 weeks after the last treatment an excision of the BCC(s) would have been performed. The study completion visit occurred either 1 week after the excision (when this visit was planned) or 1 week after the last treatment. For a subset of patients, skin biopsies were collected on the last treatment day and an excision of a BCC was also performed at that same visit.