Clinical Trials Logo

Survival, Prosthesis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Survival, Prosthesis.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03595423 Recruiting - Valve Heart Disease Clinical Trials

SPAnish Aortic VALVE Multicentric Study

SPAVALVE
Start date: July 10, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Currently there is an increase in the use of bioprosthesis worldwide (> 70% according to national data of the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery). There is conflicting evidence regarding the long-term survival of patients aged 50-65 years with mechanical (M) or biological (B) aortic prostheses. General consensus of greater complications associated with the use of long-life anticoagulation in M and of reoperation in B. Similar survival with lower MACCE complications in bioprosthesis could reconsider their choice in patients aged 50-65 years, specially in the current TAVI era. The investigators are going to perform a multicentric retrospective observational study (Registry) about 15 year-outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Aged 50 to 65 Years in 30 Cardiovascular Surgery Centers in Spain

NCT ID: NCT03523364 Completed - Clinical trials for Survival, Prosthesis

Survival Rate of All Ceramic Restorations Treated With Air-Water-Blasting Protocol

Start date: January 5, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study evaluates retrospectively the survival rate of all-ceramic restorations, cemented using AWB technique (test) compared to those cemented with conventional technique (control)

NCT ID: NCT03510065 Completed - Clinical trials for Survival, Prosthesis

Prevision® PMCF Study

Start date: January 1, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Monocentric, non-interventional Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study on past implantations of the Prevision® prosthesis; the survival rate of the Prevision® prosthesis shall be evaluated and compared to literature results on comparable Revision stems.

NCT ID: NCT03239509 Completed - Surgery Clinical Trials

15 Years Outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement Between 50-65 Years

ANDALVALVE
Start date: January 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Currently there is an increase in the use of bioprosthesis worldwide (> 70% according to national data of the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery). There is conflicting evidence regarding the long-term survival of patients aged 50-65 years with mechanical (M) or biological (B) aortic prostheses. General consensus of greater complications associated with the use of long-life anticoagulation in M and of reoperation in B. Similar survival with lower MACCE complications in bioprosthesis could reconsider their choice in patients aged 50-65 years, specially in the current TAVI era. The investigators are going to perform a multicentric retrospective observational study (Registry) about 15 year-outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Aged 50 to 65 Years in 5 Cardiovascular Surgery Centers in Andalousia (south Spain)