View clinical trials related to Survival, Prosthesis.
Filter by:Deep margin elevation (DME) is a non-invasive restorative technique to relocate the deep cervical margin to a supragingival position using resin composite. This retrospective multicenter practice-based study will assess the long-term clinical performance and periodontal health of teeth restored with CAD-CAM crowns with or without DME. Patients who will receive CAD-CAM lithium disilicate (LD) crowns with or without DME between 2013 and 2023 at multiple private practices will be included. When indicated, DME will be performed using resin-based restoration. Clinical assessment of the crowns and supporting periodontal structures will be performed following the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Intra-oral photographs, periapical and bitewing radiographs will be taken for further assessment by three evaluators. Kaplan Meier survival analyses will be performed.
This study titled "Prospective, Multicentre Study to Assess Performance of the MonoCer Acetabular Cup in Primary Total Hip Replacement" is a multi-centre prospective registry-nested cohort study, using AOANJRR's web-based data collection system integrated with Registry data collection, designed to assess the ten-year clinical outcome of the MonoCer Acetabular Cup in Primary Total Hip Replacement. The primary outcome measure is mortality and secondary measures are PROMs and complications.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the 10-year performance of the MPACT DM cup in the treatment of patients requiring total hip arthroplasty. The primary endpoint is the 10-year life span of the prosthesis according to the Kaplan Meier curve.
This bi-directional, multicentre study aims to assess multiparametric MRI Radiomics-based prediction model for identifying metastasis lymph nodes and prognostic prediction in breast cancer.
Currently there is an increase in the use of bioprosthesis worldwide (> 70% according to national data of the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery). There is conflicting evidence regarding the long-term survival of patients aged 50-65 years with mechanical (M) or biological (B) aortic prostheses. General consensus of greater complications associated with the use of long-life anticoagulation in M and of reoperation in B. Similar survival with lower MACCE complications in bioprosthesis could reconsider their choice in patients aged 50-65 years, specially in the current TAVI era. The investigators are going to perform a multicentric retrospective observational study (Registry) about 15 year-outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Aged 50 to 65 Years in 30 Cardiovascular Surgery Centers in Spain