Efficacy of Diluted Betadine vs Antibiotic Installation Before Surgical

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

1. Infection control and health-care-associated infections and Safety of medical service providers 2. Evidence based management of common medical and surgical problems

Clinical Trial Description

Surgical wound infection is the presence of replicating micro-organisms within a wound of a surgery leading to host injury. Superficial sternal wound infection (SSWI) is the infection that affects the skin and subcutaneous tissues and the pectoralis fascia(1,2). Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is the infection affecting muscle layer and the bony sternum, it is one of the most complex and potentially devastating complications following median sternotomy in cardiac surgery with a significant impact on both patient prognosis and hospital budgets, despite of many advances in prevention, it is still remaining significant, and ranges between 0.5% and 6.8%(2), with in-hospital mortality between 7% and 35%. moreover, mid- and long- term survival is significantly reduced in patients that have experienced DSWI(3). Sternal dehiscence is the process of separation of bony sternum which is often accompanied by mediastinits(4). Although prevention of infection following arthroplasty requires a multifaceted approach, the use of intraoperative irrigation is an important component of any protocol. Recent clinical practice guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control, World Health Organization, and International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection advocate the use of a dilute povidone-iodine solution prior to wound closure. This experience suggests that this practice is safe, inexpensive, and easily implemented(5). The present study is going to discuss the effect of dilute povidone-iodine irrigation vs vancomycine irrigation intraoperative in prevention of postoperative infection after cardiac surgery. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05276687
Study type	Interventional
Source	Assiut University
Contact	Abdelrahman Hamed Ahmed
Phone	00201060048430
Email	Abdelrahman.hamed.ed@gmail.com
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	September 2022
Completion date	April 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05529173` - Povidone-Iodine for Nasal Decolonization	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT03295955` - Comparing Efficacy of Postoperative Oral Antibiotic Use in Trans-Oral Thyroidectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT02776774` - Topical Antibiotic Treatment for Spine Surgical Site Infection
Terminated	`NCT00386477` - Vaginal Cleansing at Cesarean Delivery to Reduce Infection: A Randomized, Controlled Trial	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03872544` - Short Term Status of Free Dermal Fat Autografts for Complex Craniofacial Wounds
Recruiting	`NCT05077592` - Addition of Pre-wound Closure Povidone Iodine Wash Versus Direct Wound Closure Effect on Surgical Site Infections	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03148067` - Incidence and Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral and Tibial Fractures
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT03880188` - Long Term Status of Free Dermal Fat Autografts for Complex Craniofacial Wounds
Completed	`NCT01890720` - Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Prevention of Postoperative Infections Following Caesarean Section	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06319235` - Clinical Trial to Demonstrate the Safety and Efficacy of DUOFAG®	Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed	`NCT02919410` - Bacterial Colonization With and Without Iodophor-impregnated Adhesive Drapes in Hip Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT02020018` - Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Prevention of Poststernotomy Infection	N/A
Completed	`NCT01741649` - Clorhexidine Versus Povidone for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Cesarean Section	N/A
Completed	`NCT01340534` - Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce the Incidence of Post-cesarean Wound Infection	Phase 3
Not yet recruiting	`NCT01457859` - Effectiveness of Triclosan Coated Sutures in Preventing Leg Wound Infection After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03365219` - Alexis O-Ring Wound Retractor for the Prevention of Post-cesarean Surgical Site Infections	N/A
Completed	`NCT01026259` - Local Warming of Surgical Incisions	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT03574090` - Study the Efficacy of Topical Antibiotherapy in the Prophylaxis of Incisional Surgical Infection in Colorectal Surgery	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03199911` - Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Eyelids	Phase 4
Withdrawn	`NCT04053946` - Clinical Assessment of Next Science Wound Gels in Healing Below the Knee Amputation Surgical Wound Compared to SOC	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Efficacy of Diluted Betadine vs Antibiotic Installation Before Surgical Wound Closure in Prevention of Post Cardiac Surgery Wound Infection

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms