The Videolaryngoscopy in Small Infants

Surgery Clinical Trial

— VISI  

Official title:

The Videolaryngoscopy in Small Infants (VISI) Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03396432
• Other study ID #: 17-014302
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 4, 2018
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: March 2021
• Source: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Complications related to infant (≤ 1 year) airway management are under-appreciated because of few rigorous and targeted studies. Investigators have recently shown that multiple tracheal intubation (TI) attempts are a key risk factor for intubation-related complications in small children. Tracheal Intubation using Video laryngoscopy (VL) has become popular in anesthesiology practice because of several advantages over conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL). Studies show that VL improves the view of the airway compared to DL, requires fewer intubation attempts, but may take more time to intubate the trachea. This study compares first attempt success of VL to DL in infants presenting for elective surgery.

Description:

Objectives: - Primary Objective To compare the tracheal intubation (TI) first attempt success rate using VL vs. DL in children ≤ 12 months old. - Secondary Objectives To compare the lowest oxygen saturation during tracheal intubation with VL vs. DL. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, multi-center parallel group trial Setting/Participants: This will be a multi-center study with a minimum of four participating centers. The target population will be children ≤ 12 months age scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Study Interventions and Measures: The study intervention will be a 1:1 randomization to perform tracheal intubation with the Storz C-Mac Miller 1 (VL) or the conventional Miller laryngoscope (DL). Main study outcome measures are as follows: - The first intubation attempt success rate with each device - The number of attempts for successful intubation with each device - Complications associated with intubation

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 566
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: August 19, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A to 12 Months

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males or females age 0 to <12 months.

2. Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery or procedure lasting longer than 30 minutes under general anesthesia where oral endotracheal intubation will be performed by an anesthesiology clinician.

3. Subject/Parental/guardian permission (informed consent). Inclusion for clinician participants: 1) Pediatric anesthesia attending, pediatric anesthesia fellows, and anesthesia resident Exclusion Criteria

1. History of difficult intubation

2. History with abnormal airway

3. Predictive of difficult intubation upon physical examination

4. Parents/guardians who, in the opinion of the investigator, may be unable to understand or give informed consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anesthesia, Endotracheal
• Surgery

Intervention

Device:
• Video Laryngoscopy for ET placement
Tracheal intubation performed with the Storz C-Mac Video Laryngoscope
• Direct Laryngoscopy for ET Placement
Tracheal Intubation performed with the Miller Blade

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Australia	Princess Margaret Hospital For Children	Subiaco	Perth
United States	Boston Children's Hospital	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	UT Southwestern Medical Center	Dallas	Texas
United States	The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia	Philadelphia	Pennsylvania
United States	Seattle Children's Hospital	Seattle	Washington

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia	Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia, 

References & Publications (12)

Abdelgadir IS, Phillips RS, Singh D, Moncreiff MP, Lumsden JL. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 24;5:CD011413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011413.pub2. Review. — View Citation

Fiadjoe JE, Nishisaki A, Jagannathan N, Hunyady AI, Greenberg RS, Reynolds PI, Matuszczak ME, Rehman MA, Polaner DM, Szmuk P, Nadkarni VM, McGowan FX Jr, Litman RS, Kovatsis PG. Airway management complications in children with difficult tracheal intubation from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry: a prospective cohort analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jan;4(1):37-48. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00508-1. Epub 2015 Dec 17. — View Citation

Goto T, Gibo K, Hagiwara Y, Morita H, Brown DF, Brown CA 3rd, Hasegawa K; Japanese Emergency Medicine Network Investigators. Multiple failed intubation attempts are associated with decreased success rates on the first rescue intubation in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis of multicentre observational data. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Jan 16;23:5. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0085-8. — View Citation

Goto T, Watase H, Morita H, Nagai H, Brown CA 3rd, Brown DF, Hasegawa K; Japanese Emergency Medicine Network Investigators. Repeated attempts at tracheal intubation by a single intubator associated with decreased success rates in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicentre prospective observational study. Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):781-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203473. Epub 2014 Dec 31. — View Citation

Grunwell JR, Kamat PP, Miksa M, Krishna A, Walson K, Simon D, Krawiec C, Breuer R, Lee JH, Gradidge E, Tarquinio K, Shenoi A, Shults J, Nadkarni V, Nishisaki A; National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis (PALISI) Network. Trend and Outcomes of Video Laryngoscope Use Across PICUs. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;18(8):741-749. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001175. — View Citation

Howard-Quijano KJ, Huang YM, Matevosian R, Kaplan MB, Steadman RH. Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):568-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen211. Epub 2008 Aug 1. — View Citation

Lingappan K, Arnold JL, Shaw TL, Fernandes CJ, Pammi M. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 18;(2):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub2. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 04;6:CD009975. — View Citation

Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):607-13, table of contents. — View Citation

Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jan;110(1):32-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190b6a7. — View Citation

Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):71-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12055. — View Citation

Souza Nd, Carvalho WB. [Complications of tracheal intubation in pediatrics]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009 Nov-Dec;55(6):646-50. Portuguese. — View Citation

Sun H, Liu M, Lin Z, Jiang H, Niu Y, Wang H, Chen S. Comprehensive identification of 125 multifarious constituents in Shuang-huang-lian powder injection by HPLC-DAD-ESI-IT-TOF-MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015 Nov 10;115:86-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 30. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of Participants With Success in the First Attempt	comparing the tracheal intubation (TI) first attempt success rate using VL vs. DL	at the time of intubation
Secondary	Hypoxia	Comparing the lowest oxygen saturation during tracheal intubation with VL vs. DL	At the time of intubation