Clinical Trials Logo

Sugammadex clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Sugammadex.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06081738 Active, not recruiting - Sugammadex Clinical Trials

Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex on Renal Functions

Start date: March 1, 2023
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The study will assess the acute effects of sugammadex or neostigmine on renal function as determined with more specific and sensitive tests in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT05886218 Recruiting - Sugammadex Clinical Trials

Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring and Gastric Bypass Surgery

Start date: February 8, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is a single site, prospective, non-blinded, non-randomized, before/after study. This study is designed to evaluate the impact of monitoring and reversal guidelines for neuromuscular blocking drugs on the post-operative outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05794503 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Neuromuscular Blockade

Postoperative Urinary Retention After Reversal of Neuromuscular Block by Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex

Start date: September 11, 2023
Phase: Early Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This study is intended to be a single-site, prospective, randomized, controlled study that intends to enroll a total of 230 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Parkland Hospital. Patients will be randomized to receive either neostigmine or sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. A standardized anesthetic protocol that is usual and customary for the type of operation the patient is having will be provided to the anesthesia teams of enrolled subjects. The remainder of the anesthetic care of the subject will not deviate from the standard of care. To account for protocol deviations and patient dropout, up to 250 randomization envelopes will be made and enrollment will continue until there are 230 completed enrollments.

NCT ID: NCT05751603 Not yet recruiting - Extubation Clinical Trials

Effectiveness on Smooth Extubation According to the Administration Time of Sugammadex

Start date: October 3, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

After surgery is completed under general anesthesia, extubation is performed after recovery from anesthesia, and during this process, bucking, coughing, and rapid and excessive hemodynamic fluctuations occur very often. These phenomena can lead to high intrathoracic pressure, venous congestion, hematoma formation, or increased bleeding after major neck surgery. (1) They can also increase the risk of aerosol generation, which can transmit infection to health care workers. (2) For this, smooth extubation is required. Methods of administering drugs such as lidocaine, opioids, or dexmedetomidine have been proposed for smooth extubation. (3-5) As a disadvantage, the use of these drugs may be associated with deep sedation and reduced airway reflexes . Recently, Babu et al. (6) reported that bucking and coughing during extubation could be reduced by changing the timing of administering a muscle relaxant antagonist rather than using these sedative drugs, and thus complications related to extubation could be reduced. In general, in the awakening process, it was common to administer the muscle relaxant at the point of recovery of spontaneous breathing. However, Babu et al. demonstrated the possibility of safe and smooth extubation by changing the timing of administering neostigmine without the use of sedatives or narcotic analgesics, but there are few studies on sugammadex. Therefore, when recovering from general anesthesia, sugammadex was administered before and immediately after extubation to evaluate and compare smooth extubation (ie, comparison of the frequency of bucking and coughing).

NCT ID: NCT05066035 Completed - Clinical trials for Neuromuscular Blockade

Residual Paralysis and Reversal With Routine Neostigmine Versus Half-dose Sugammadex and Routine Neostigmine

Start date: May 1, 2013
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Sugammadex may prevent residual neuromuscular blockade by providing rapid reversal at the end of the operation. Our goal is to compare the half-dose use of sugammadex for reversing residual blockade after administration of neostigmine and atropine to the routine use of reversal medication.

NCT ID: NCT05028088 Recruiting - Liver Dysfunction Clinical Trials

Diaphragm Ultrasound to Evaluate the Antagonistic Effect of Sugammadex

Start date: July 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The use of muscle relaxants is an indispensable in the general anesthesia but is prone to accidents, which are often related to residual muscle relaxant. Therefore, how to timely and effectively eliminate the residual effect of muscle relaxants after surgery has become an urgent clinical problem. Rocuronium is a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant that is primarily metabolized by the liver. Patients with liver dysfunction can affect the metabolic process of rocuronium, thereby delaying the recovery of muscle relaxation. Sugammadex (SUG) is a novel specific antagonist of aminosteroid muscle relaxants, which can effectively antagonize muscle relaxants at different depths. However, whether liver dysfunction affects the antagonistic effect of SUG against rocuronium has not been reported yet. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that with the increase of patients' liver Child-Pugh grade, the recovery time of rocuronium antagonized by the same dose of SUG after surgery will be prolonged, and the incidence of muscle relaxation residual will be increased in the short term.

NCT ID: NCT04997759 Recruiting - Sugammadex Clinical Trials

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sugammadex and Neostigmine

Start date: September 6, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Along with unconsciousness and analgesia, use a muscle relaxant (Neuromuscular blocking agent NMBA) is now part of the classic triad of anesthesia. In surgery or interventional procedure under general anesthesia, NMBA is needed to relax the muscles of the whole body. Its purpose is to assist the placement of the endotracheal tube, avoid the participant's injury due to involuntary movements, and also enables the surgeon to have a better surgical vision, etc. Once the operation or procedure is completed, anesthesiologist will reverse the NMBA and participants are recovered from general anesthesia. It is crucial to maintain hemodynamic stability during this period. The participant's vital signs are unstable during this period because the participant is gradually recovered from anesthesia and they feel throat discomfort from endotracheal tube. Immediate extubation is encouraged in the operating theatre and full recovery of neuromuscular function must be achieved prior to extubation of the endotrachea tube. Traditionally, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI, such as neostigmine, pyridostigmine, edrophonium) is used to reverse the efficacy of NMBA and stabilize the participants's vital signs. However, the reversal of acetylcholine ester inhibitors is slow, the curative effect has a ceiling effect, and the need to use anticholinergics (anticholinergics) to reduce the incidence of adverse reactions and other issues. In addition, traditional muscle relaxants may also cause complications, such as postoperative residual curarization (PORC). PORC is associated with weakness of upper airway muscles and increased risk of hypoventilation and hypoxemia, as well as risk for aspiration and postoperative pulmonary complications. Sugammadex is a new selective relaxant-binding agent that quickly and effectively reverses the effects of steroidal NMBAs, especially rocuronium and vecuronium. Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex more substantially reduces PORC, but its effects on postoperative complications require further investigation. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine during emergence and extubation after general anesthesia in non-cardiac surgery and interventional procedure.

NCT ID: NCT04608682 Completed - Sugammadex Clinical Trials

Effect of Muscle Relaxation Reversal on the Success Rate of Motor Evoked Potential Recording

Start date: August 16, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring is conventionally performed during surgery without or with minimal neuromuscular blockade (NMB) because of its potential interference with signal interpretation.The feasibility of TcMEP interpretation was assessed during partial NMB in adult neurosurgical patients. However, partial NMB may interfere record of TcMEP monitoring. Sugammadex is the first highly selective antagonist that can reverse NMB. This study aims to evaluate the success rate of intraoperative muscle relax reversal by sugammadex on intraoperative TceMEP recording.

NCT ID: NCT04566796 Recruiting - Sugammadex Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Sugammadex on Muscle Relaxant Reversal in Preterm Neonates

Start date: August 11, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim of the work is to compare the efficacy of Sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation to reach complete recovery of neuromuscular block (TOF ratio≥ 0.9) in preterm neonates. The secondary aim is to evaluate the safety of using Sugammadex in preterm neonates and to detect any complications that may occur in this age group.

NCT ID: NCT04471376 Completed - Sugammadex Clinical Trials

The Effect of Sugammadex During Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Spinal Surgery

Start date: July 16, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring is conventionally performed during neurosurgical procedures without or with minimal neuromuscular blockade (NMB) because of its potential interference with signal interpretation. However, full blockade offers increased anesthetic management options and facilitates surgery. Here, investigators want to assess the effect of Sugammadex during TcMEP in adult patients. Sugammadex is designed to encapsulate rocuronium and reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. 64 patients undergoing thoracic or lumbar spinal surgery will be randomly allocated into sugammadex group or control group under a ratio of 1 to 1. Patients will receive either continuous infusion of rocuronium to produce blockade maintained at least two twitches in Train-of-Four (TOF), rocuronium infusion will be discontinued and 2 mg/kg of sugammadex will be infused while dura opening in sugammadex group. Whereas no muscle relaxant will be given after anesthetic induction in control group. The primary aim of this study is to compare mean value of amplitudes of TcMEPs in abductor pollicis brevis muscles of both upper extremities 5 minutes after dura opening.